Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

LiDAR data acquisition and processing for ecology applications (2401.05891v1)

Published 11 Jan 2024 in cs.CV

Abstract: The collection of ecological data in the field is essential to diagnose, monitor and manage ecosystems in a sustainable way. Since acquisition of this information through traditional methods are generally time-consuming, due to the capability of recording large volumes of data in short time periods, automation of data acquisition sees a growing trend. Terrestrial laser scanners (TLS), particularly LiDAR sensors, have been used in ecology, allowing to reconstruct the 3D structure of vegetation, and thus, infer ecosystem characteristics based on the spatial variation of the density of points. However, the low amount of information obtained per beam, lack of data analysis tools and the high cost of the equipment limit their use. This way, a low-cost TLS (<10k$) was developed along with data acquisition and processing mechanisms applicable in two case studies: an urban garden and a target area for ecological restoration. The orientation of LiDAR was modified to make observations in the vertical plane and a motor was integrated for its rotation, enabling the acquisition of 360 degree data with high resolution. Motion and location sensors were also integrated for automatic error correction and georeferencing. From the data generated, histograms of point density variation along the vegetation height were created, where shrub stratum was easily distinguishable from tree stratum, and maximum tree height and shrub cover were calculated. These results agreed with the field data, whereby the developed TLS has proved to be effective in calculating metrics of structural complexity of vegetation.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. M. J. Sumnall, R. A. Hill, and S. A. Hinsley, “Comparison of small-footprint discrete return and full waveform airborne lidar data for estimating multiple forest variables,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 173, pp. 214–223, 2016.
  2. K. Lim, P. Treitz, M. Wulder, B. St-Onge, and M. Flood, “Lidar remote sensing of forest structure,” Progress in physical geography, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 88–106, 2003.
  3. M. Dassot, T. Constant, and M. Fournier, “The use of terrestrial lidar technology in forest science: application fields, benefits and challenges,” Annals of forest science, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 959–974, 2011.
  4. M. Disney, “Terrestrial li dar: a three-dimensional revolution in how we look at trees,” New Phytologist, vol. 222, no. 4, pp. 1736–1741, 2019.
  5. D. R. A. d. Almeida, S. C. Stark, R. Chazdon, B. W. Nelson, R. G. César, P. Meli, E. Gorgens, M. M. Duarte, R. Valbuena, V. S. Moreno et al., “The effectiveness of lidar remote sensing for monitoring forest cover attributes and landscape restoration,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 438, pp. 34–43, 2019.
  6. C. Edson and M. G. Wing, “Airborne light detection and ranging (lidar) for individual tree stem location, height, and biomass measurements,” Remote Sensing, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 2494–2528, 2011.
  7. C. M. Listopad, M. Köbel, A. Príncipe, P. Gonçalves, and C. Branquinho, “The effect of grazing exclusion over time on structure, biodiversity, and regeneration of high nature value farmland ecosystems in europe,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 610, pp. 926–936, 2018.
  8. C. M. Listopad, R. E. Masters, J. Drake, J. Weishampel, and C. Branquinho, “Structural diversity indices based on airborne lidar as ecological indicators for managing highly dynamic landscapes,” Ecological Indicators, vol. 57, pp. 268–279, 2015.
  9. J. T. Fisher, B. F. Erasmus, E. T. Witkowski, J. van Aardt, K. J. Wessels, and G. P. Asner, “Savanna woody vegetation classification–now in 3-d,” Applied Vegetation Science, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 172–184, 2014.
  10. M. Melin, A. Shapiro, and P. Glover-Kapfer, “Lidar for ecology and conservation - wwf conservation technology series (3),” 10 2017.
  11. M. Beland, G. Parker, B. Sparrow, D. Harding, L. Chasmer, S. Phinn, A. Antonarakis, and A. Strahler, “On promoting the use of lidar systems in forest ecosystem research,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 450, p. 117484, 2019.
  12. “circuito.io: https://www.instructables.com/automated-turntable-with-steppermotor/,” accessed on 16 February 2020.
  13. “Nema 17hs13-0404s1: https://www.ptrobotics.com/motor-stepper/5782-nema-17-bipolar-18deg-26ncm-368ozin-04a-12v-42x42x34mm-4-wires.html,” accessed on 21 February 2020.
  14. “Pololu tic t500: https://www.ptrobotics.com/pontes-h/5982-tic-t500-usb-multi-interface-stepper-motor-controller.html,” accessed on 21 February 2020.
  15. “Sparkfun lsm6ds3: https://www.ptrobotics.com/imu/5367-sparkfun-6-degrees-of-freedom-breakout-lsm6ds3.html,” accessed on 5 August 2020.
  16. “Gy-511 lsm303dlhc: https://www.ptrobotics.com/acelerometros/7207-gy-511-lsm303dlhc-compass-3-axis-accelerometer-and-magnetometer-sensor-module.html,” accessed on 5 August 2020.
  17. B. McCarron, “Low-cost imu implementation via sensor fusion algorithms in the arduino environment,” 2013.
  18. D. Girardeau-Montaut, “Cloudcompare,” 2016.
  19. A. Manos, I. Klein, and T. Hazan, “Gravity-based methods for heading computation in pedestrian dead reckoning,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 5, p. 1170, 2019.
  20. R. H. Canfield, “Application of the line interception method in sampling range vegetation,” Journal of forestry, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 388–394, 1941.
  21. “Python-pcl: https://github.com/strawlab/python-pcl,” accessed on 18 February 2020.
  22. J.-R. Roussel, D. Auty, F. De Boissieu, and A. Meador, “lidr: Airborne lidar data manipulation and visualization for forestry applications,” R package version, vol. 1, no. 1, 2018.
  23. J.-R. Roussel, D. Auty, N. C. Coops, P. Tompalski, T. R. Goodbody, A. S. Meador, J.-F. Bourdon, F. de Boissieu, and A. Achim, “lidr: An r package for analysis of airborne laser scanning (als) data,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 251, p. 112061, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425720304314
  24. C. Hug, P. Krzystek, and W. Fuchs, “Advanced lidar data processing with lastools,” in XXth ISPRS Congress, 2004, pp. 12–23.
  25. H. Wickham, “ggplot2,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 180–185, 2011.
  26. J. Oksanen, F. G. Blanchet, M. Friendly, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, D. McGlinn, P. R. Minchin, R. O’hara, G. L. Simpson, P. Solymos et al., “vegan: Community ecology package. r package version 2.4-3,” 2016.
  27. “Albatroz engenharia sa.: https://www.albatroz-eng.com/,” accessed on 20 December 2020.
  28. RIEGL, “Vux-1uav lidar model: http://www.riegl.com/products/unmanned-scanning/riegl-vux-1uav/,” accessed on 20 December 2020.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.