Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Quantum Time-Space Tradeoffs for Matrix Problems (2401.05321v2)

Published 10 Jan 2024 in cs.CC and quant-ph

Abstract: We consider the time and space required for quantum computers to solve a wide variety of problems involving matrices, many of which have only been analyzed classically in prior work. Our main results show that for a range of linear algebra problems -- including matrix-vector product, matrix inversion, matrix multiplication and powering -- existing classical time-space tradeoffs, several of which are tight for every space bound, also apply to quantum algorithms. For example, for almost all matrices $A$, including the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) matrix, we prove that quantum circuits with at most $T$ input queries and $S$ qubits of memory require $T=\Omega(n2/S)$ to compute matrix-vector product $Ax$ for $x \in {0,1}n$. We similarly prove that matrix multiplication for $n\times n$ binary matrices requires $T=\Omega(n3 / \sqrt{S})$. Because many of our lower bounds match deterministic algorithms with the same time and space complexity, we show that quantum computers cannot provide any asymptotic advantage for these problems with any space bound. We obtain matching lower bounds for the stronger notion of quantum cumulative memory complexity -- the sum of the space per layer of a circuit. We also consider Boolean (i.e. AND-OR) matrix multiplication and matrix-vector products, improving the previous quantum time-space tradeoff lower bounds for $n\times n$ Boolean matrix multiplication to $T=\Omega(n{2.5}/S{1/4})$ from $T=\Omega(n{2.5}/S{1/2})$. Our improved lower bound for Boolean matrix multiplication is based on a new coloring argument that extracts more from the strong direct product theorem used in prior work. Our tight lower bounds for linear algebra problems require adding a new bucketing method to the recording-query technique of Zhandry that lets us apply classical arguments to upper bound the success probability of quantum circuits.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (37)
  1. Scott Aaronson. Limitations of quantum advice and one-way communication. Theory of Computing, 1(1):1–28, 2005.
  2. Karl R. Abrahamson. A time-space tradeoff for Boolean matrix multiplication. In 31st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, October 22-24, 1990, Volume I, pages 412–419. IEEE Computer Society, 1990.
  3. Karl R. Abrahamson. Time-space tradeoffs for algebraic problems on general sequential machines. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 43(2):269–289, 1991.
  4. Andris Ambainis. Quantum lower bounds by quantum arguments. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 64(4):750–767, 2002.
  5. A new quantum lower bound method, with applications to direct product theorems and time-space tradeoffs. Algorithmica, 55(3):422–461, Nov 2009.
  6. Quantum lower bounds by polynomials. J. Acm, 48(4):778–797, jul 2001.
  7. A time-space tradeoff for sorting on a general sequential model of computation. SIAM J. Comput., 11(2):287–297, 1982.
  8. Paul Beame. A general sequential time-space tradeoff for finding unique elements. SIAM J. Comput., 20(2):270–277, 1991.
  9. A time-space tradeoff for sorting on non-oblivious machines. In 20th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1979), pages 319–327, 1979.
  10. Cumulative Memory Lower Bounds for Randomized and Quantum Computation. In Kousha Etessami, Uriel Feige, and Gabriele Puppis, editors, 50th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2023), volume 261 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), pages 17:1–17:20, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2023. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik.
  11. An improved classical singular value transformation for quantum machine learning, 2023.
  12. Quantum complexity theory. SIAM Journal on Computing, 1997.
  13. Quantum-inspired algorithms from randomized numerical linear algebra. In Kamalika Chaudhuri, Stefanie Jegelka, Le Song, Csaba Szepesvári, Gang Niu, and Sivan Sabato, editors, International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2022, 17-23 July 2022, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, volume 162 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 3879–3900. PMLR, 2022.
  14. Sampling-based sublinear low-rank matrix arithmetic framework for dequantizing quantum machine learning. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2020, page 387–400, New York, NY, USA, 2020. Association for Computing Machinery.
  15. Quantum-Inspired Algorithms for Solving Low-Rank Linear Equation Systems with Logarithmic Dependence on the Dimension. In Yixin Cao, Siu-Wing Cheng, and Minming Li, editors, 31st International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2020), volume 181 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), pages 47:1–47:17, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2020. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik.
  16. Quantum algorithm for systems of linear equations with exponentially improved dependence on precision. SIAM J. Comput., 46:1920–1950, 2015.
  17. Rapid solution of problems by quantum computation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1992.
  18. Lov K. Grover. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’96, page 212–219, New York, NY, USA, 1996. Association for Computing Machinery.
  19. Quantum singular value transformation and beyond: Exponential improvements for quantum matrix arithmetics. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2019, page 193–204, New York, NY, USA, 2019. Association for Computing Machinery.
  20. An improved quantum-inspired algorithm for linear regression. Quantum, 6:754, jun 2022.
  21. Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations. Physical Review Letters, 103(15), oct 2009.
  22. Quantum-classical tradeoffs in the random oracle model. CoRR, abs/2211.12954, 2022.
  23. Quantum time-space tradeoff for finding multiple collision pairs. In Min-Hsiu Hsieh, editor, 16th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2021), volume 197 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), pages 1:1–1:21, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2021. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik.
  24. Quantum and classical strong direct product theorems and optimal time-space tradeoffs. SIAM Journal on Computing, 36(5):1472–1493, 2007.
  25. Hamiltonian simulation by qubitization. Quantum, 3:163, jul 2019.
  26. On finding quantum multi-collisions. CoRR, abs/1811.05385, 2018.
  27. The computational complexity of universal hashing. Theor. Comput. Sci., 107(1):121–133, 1993.
  28. Ansis Rosmanis. Tight bounds for inverting permutations via compressed oracle arguments. CoRR, abs/2103.08975, 2021.
  29. Alexander A. Sherstov. Strong direct product theorems for quantum communication and query complexity. In Proceedings of the Forty-Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Stoc ’11, page 41–50, New York, NY, USA, 2011. Association for Computing Machinery.
  30. Alexander A. Sherstov. Strong direct product theorems for quantum communication and query complexity. SIAM J. Comput., 41(5):1122–1165, 2012.
  31. Daniel Simon. On the power of quantum computation. SIAM Journal on Computing, 97.
  32. Robert Špalek. The multiplicative quantum adversary. In 2008 23rd Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pages 237–248, 2008.
  33. All quantum adversary methods are equivalent. In Luís Caires, Giuseppe F. Italiano, Luís Monteiro, Catuscia Palamidessi, and Moti Yung, editors, Automata, Languages and Programming, pages 1299–1311, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  34. Ewin Tang. A quantum-inspired classical algorithm for recommendation systems. Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2018.
  35. Martin Tompa. Time-space tradeoffs for computing functions, using connectivity properties of their circuits. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’78, page 196–204, New York, NY, USA, 1978. Association for Computing Machinery.
  36. Yaacov Yesha. Time-space tradeoffs for matrix multiplication and the discrete Fourier transform on any general sequential random-access computer. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 29(2):183–197, 1984.
  37. Mark Zhandry. How to record quantum queries, and applications to quantum indifferentiability. In Alexandra Boldyreva and Daniele Micciancio, editors, Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2019, pages 239–268, Cham, 2019. Springer International Publishing.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Paul Beame (25 papers)
  2. Niels Kornerup (6 papers)
  3. Michael Whitmeyer (8 papers)
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.