Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
140 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Bootstrapping LLM-based Task-Oriented Dialogue Agents via Self-Talk (2401.05033v1)

Published 10 Jan 2024 in cs.CL and cs.AI

Abstract: LLMs are powerful dialogue agents, but specializing them towards fulfilling a specific function can be challenging. Instructing tuning, i.e. tuning models on instruction and sample responses generated by humans (Ouyang et al., 2022), has proven as an effective method to do so, yet requires a number of data samples that a) might not be available or b) costly to generate. Furthermore, this cost increases when the goal is to make the LLM follow a specific workflow within a dialogue instead of single instructions. Inspired by the self-play technique in reinforcement learning and the use of LLMs to simulate human agents, we propose a more effective method for data collection through LLMs engaging in a conversation in various roles. This approach generates a training data via "self-talk" of LLMs that can be refined and utilized for supervised fine-tuning. We introduce an automated way to measure the (partial) success of a dialogue. This metric is used to filter the generated conversational data that is fed back in LLM for training. Based on our automated and human evaluations of conversation quality, we demonstrate that such self-talk data improves results. In addition, we examine the various characteristics that showcase the quality of generated dialogues and how they can be connected to their potential utility as training data.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (54)
  1. Self-consuming generative models go mad. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01850.
  2. Out of one, many: Using language models to simulate human samples. Political Analysis, 31(3):337–351.
  3. Constitutional ai: Harmlessness from ai feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.08073.
  4. Action-based conversations dataset: A corpus for building more in-depth task-oriented dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 3002–3017.
  5. Teaching large language models to self-debug. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05128.
  6. Chataug: Leveraging chatgpt for text data augmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13007.
  7. An optimal transportation approach for assessing almost stochastic order. In The Mathematics of the Uncertain, pages 33–44. Springer.
  8. Deep dominance - how to properly compare deep neural models. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2019, Florence, Italy, July 28- August 2, 2019, Volume 1: Long Papers, pages 2773–2785. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  9. Hierarchical neural story generation. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2018, Melbourne, Australia, July 15-20, 2018, Volume 1: Long Papers, pages 889–898. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  10. A survey on bias in deep nlp. Applied Sciences, 11(7):3184.
  11. Xinyang Geng and Hao Liu. 2023. Openllama: An open reproduction of llama.
  12. Self-verification improves few-shot clinical information extraction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00024.
  13. Reinforced self-training (rest) for language modeling.
  14. Julian Hazell. 2023. Large language models can be used to effectively scale spear phishing campaigns. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.06972.
  15. Debertav3: Improving deberta using electra-style pre-training with gradient-disentangled embedding sharing.
  16. Deberta: decoding-enhanced bert with disentangled attention. In 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021, Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021. OpenReview.net.
  17. The curious case of neural text degeneration. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020.
  18. Learning to write with cooperative discriminators. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2018, Melbourne, Australia, July 15-20, 2018, Volume 1: Long Papers, pages 1638–1649. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  19. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. In The Tenth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2022, Virtual Event, April 25-29, 2022.
  20. Jennifer Hu and Roger Levy. 2023. Prompt-based methods may underestimate large language models’ linguistic generalizations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13264.
  21. Controllable dialogue simulation with in-context learning. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, December 7-11, 2022, pages 4330–4347. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  22. Chin-Yew Lin. 2004. Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Text summarization branches out, pages 74–81.
  23. A generative user simulator with gpt-based architecture and goal state tracking for reinforced multi-domain dialog systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.08692.
  24. Training socially aligned language models in simulated human society. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16960.
  25. MosaicML NLP Team. 2023. Introducing mpt-7b: A new standard for open-source, commercially usable llms. Accessed: 2023-05-05.
  26. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:27730–27744.
  27. Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03442.
  28. Refiner: Reasoning feedback on intermediate representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.01904.
  29. Jordan Pollack and Alan Blair. 1996. Why did td-gammon work? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 9.
  30. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8):9.
  31. Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18290.
  32. Is reinforcement learning (not) for natural language processing: Benchmarks, baselines, and building blocks for natural language policy optimization. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2023, Kigali, Rwanda, May 1-5, 2023.
  33. Neural theory-of-mind? on the limits of social intelligence in large lms. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2022, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, December 7-11, 2022, pages 3762–3780. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  34. Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.05802.
  35. Training language models with language feedback at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16755.
  36. Mastering atari, go, chess and shogi by planning with a learned model. Nature, 588(7839):604–609.
  37. Bootstrapping a neural conversational agent with dialogue self-play, crowdsourcing and on-line reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 3 (Industry Papers), pages 41–51.
  38. Building a conversational agent overnight with dialogue self-play. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.04871.
  39. Model dementia: Generated data makes models forget. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.17493.
  40. Deploying lifelong open-domain dialogue learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.08076.
  41. Mastering the game of go with deep neural networks and tree search. nature, 529(7587):484–489.
  42. Mastering the game of go without human knowledge. nature, 550(7676):354–359.
  43. Karolina Stanczak and Isabelle Augenstein. 2021. A survey on gender bias in natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.14168.
  44. Gerald Tesauro. 1994. Td-gammon, a self-teaching backgammon program, achieves master-level play. Neural computation, 6(2):215–219.
  45. Together Computer. 2023. Redpajama-data: An open source recipe to reproduce llama training dataset.
  46. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971.
  47. deep-significance: Easy and meaningful signifcance testing in the age of neural networks. In ML Evaluation Standards Workshop at the Tenth International Conference on Learning Representations.
  48. Learning to speak and act in a fantasy text adventure game. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019, Hong Kong, China, November 3-7, 2019, pages 673–683. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  49. Michiel Van Der Ree and Marco Wiering. 2013. Reinforcement learning in the game of othello: Learning against a fixed opponent and learning from self-play. In 2013 IEEE symposium on adaptive dynamic programming and reinforcement learning (ADPRL), pages 108–115. IEEE.
  50. Disembodied machine learning: On the illusion of objectivity in nlp. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.11974.
  51. Gpt3mix: Leveraging large-scale language models for text augmentation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021, Virtual Event / Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, 16-20 November, 2021, pages 2225–2239. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  52. Sgp-tod: Building task bots effortlessly via schema-guided llm prompting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.09067.
  53. A survey of active learning for natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2022, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, December 7-11, 2022, pages 6166–6190. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  54. Anytod: A programmable task-oriented dialog system. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09939.
Citations (21)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

  • The paper introduces a self-talk method where LLMs simulate dialogues to generate high-quality training data for task-oriented agents.
  • It employs dual LLM roles—client and agent—to create structured conversations, using automated metrics to assess dialogue success.
  • Human and automated evaluations show that fine-tuning with self-generated data improves adherence to conversation workflows while reducing human effort.

Introduction to Bootstrapped Dialogue Agents

LLMs have emerged as potent tools capable of powering conversational agents across a spectrum of applications, from virtual assistants to customer support. These models are adept at understanding and responding to a variety of user inputs. However, tailoring LLMs to handle specific tasks or to navigate through prescribed workflows within conversations requires additional training data, which can be scarce or expensive to produce.

Novel Approach to Data Generation

An innovative approach to overcome this hurdle involves LLM's self-conversation capabilities to generate their own training data—a method delineated as "self-talk." This technique enables two variations of LLMs to partake in scripted dialogs, acting as both the client and the agent. The agent is assigned a structured set of behavioral processes while the client embodies a character with a unique persona. Their ensuing interaction generates novel conversational data which, after being selectively sifted for quality, can be fed back to refine the agent’s abilities to adhere to specific dialog workflows.

A clear advantage of this method is the automation of data collection without direct human involvement. Yet, this raises a crucial question: Can LLMs effectively refine their skills solely based on internally generated conversations?

Self-Talk Advantages and Implementation

The use of self-talk in training dialogue agents has demonstrated promising advantages. It relies less on costly human-generated data and enables the LLM to simulate both sides of an interaction—thus rapidly producing a diverse dataset. The paper explains that by absorbing successful conversation patterns from these self-dialogs, an LLM can improve its capacity to stick to a task-focused conversation flow.

The success of a dialogue is computed using a new automated metric that filters out only the high-quality exchanges. These dialogues are then utilized to finetune the task-oriented agent model. The paper carries significant weight as it also proffers new automated evaluation metrics to assess conversation success and consistency.

Validation and Human-Centric Considerations

Through both human evaluations and automated metrics, the paper validates that models fine-tuned with self-talk data show tangible improvements in managing task-oriented dialogues. While the model predominantly benefits from operating on such filtered, self-generated datasets, potential failures such as conversational loops or non-adherence to workflows suggest arenas for enhancement.

The research opens avenues for more robust and less labor-intensive methodologies for improving dialogue agents, inviting exploration into multi-turn dialogue settings, the impact of model sizes, and the extent to which LLMs can furnish self-improvement signals. However, this paper’s focus is specific to task-oriented figures and doesn’t digress into open-ended dialogues or other NLP task variations.

In summarizing this research, it's fundamental to acknowledge that while the concept of virtual agents training through self-conversation is a leap forward, the potential amplification of biases and the unintended consequences of further reducing the human oversight in model training require careful ethical consideration. The findings from this work ultimately bolster the idea that LLMs hold the potential to self-evolve and to become more effective conversational partners.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown