Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Tackling Electrode Shift In Gesture Recognition with HD-EMG Electrode Subsets (2401.02773v1)

Published 5 Jan 2024 in cs.LG, cs.AI, and eess.SP

Abstract: sEMG pattern recognition algorithms have been explored extensively in decoding movement intent, yet are known to be vulnerable to changing recording conditions, exhibiting significant drops in performance across subjects, and even across sessions. Multi-channel surface EMG, also referred to as high-density sEMG (HD-sEMG) systems, have been used to improve performance with the information collected through the use of additional electrodes. However, a lack of robustness is ever present due to limited datasets and the difficulties in addressing sources of variability, such as electrode placement. In this study, we propose training on a collection of input channel subsets and augmenting our training distribution with data from different electrode locations, simultaneously targeting electrode shift and reducing input dimensionality. Our method increases robustness against electrode shift and results in significantly higher intersession performance across subjects and classification algorithms.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. “Dynamic finger task identification using electromyography,” in 2022 9th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference for Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), 2022, pp. 1–6.
  2. “The extraction of neural information from the surface emg for the control of upper-limb prostheses: Emerging avenues and challenges,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 797–809, 2014.
  3. “Lower limb kinematic, kinetic, and emg data from young healthy humans during walking at controlled speeds,” Scientific Data, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 103, Apr 2021.
  4. “Deep learning for emg-based human-machine interaction: A review,” IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 512–533, 2021.
  5. “Current trends and confounding factors in myoelectric control: Limb position and contraction intensity,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 6, 2020.
  6. “Surface emg-based inter-session gesture recognition enhanced by deep domain adaptation,” Sensors, vol. 17, no. 3, 2017.
  7. “The effect of electrode displacements on pattern recognition based myoelectric control,” in 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2006, pp. 2203–2206.
  8. “Csac-net: Fast adaptive semg recognition through attention convolution network and model-agnostic meta-learning,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 10, 2022.
  9. K. Englehart and B. Hudgins, “A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 848–854, 2003.
  10. “Electromyogram (emg) feature reduction using mutual components analysis for multifunction prosthetic fingers control,” in 2012 12th International Conference on Control Automation Robotics & Vision (ICARCV), 2012, pp. 1534–1539.
  11. “Electromyography data for non-invasive naturally-controlled robotic hand prostheses,” Scientific Data, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 140053, Dec 2014.
  12. “Emg feature evaluation for improving myoelectric pattern recognition robustness,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 4832–4840, 2013.
  13. “Improving myoelectric pattern recognition robustness to electrode shift by changing interelectrode distance and electrode configuration,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 645–652, 2012.
  14. “Improved high-density myoelectric pattern recognition control against electrode shift using data augmentation and dilated convolutional neural network,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 2637–2646, 2020.
  15. “A training strategy to reduce classification degradation due to electrode displacements in pattern recognition based myoelectric control,” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 175–180, 2008, Surface Electromyography.
  16. “A novel framework based on position verification for robust myoelectric control against sensor shift,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 19, no. 21, pp. 9859–9868, 2019.
  17. “Leveraging high-density emg to investigate bipolar electrode placement for gait prediction models,” 2023.
  18. “Design of a novel non-invasive wearable device for array surface electromyogram,” Int. J. Inf. Electron. Eng., vol. 6, no. 2, 2016.
  19. “Surface emg-based inter-session gesture recognition enhanced by deep domain adaptation,” Sensors, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 458, 2017.
  20. “CSAC-Net: Fast Adaptive sEMG Recognition through Attention Convolution Network and Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 3661, Jan. 2022, Number: 10 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
  21. “The effects of electrode size and orientation on the sensitivity of myoelectric pattern recognition systems to electrode shift,” IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 2537–2544, 2011.
Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets