Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 48 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 205 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 473 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Fairness-Aware Job Scheduling for Multi-Job Federated Learning (2401.02740v3)

Published 5 Jan 2024 in cs.LG, cs.AI, and cs.DC

Abstract: Federated learning (FL) enables multiple data owners (a.k.a. FL clients) to collaboratively train machine learning models without disclosing sensitive private data. Existing FL research mostly focuses on the monopoly scenario in which a single FL server selects a subset of FL clients to update their local models in each round of training. In practice, there can be multiple FL servers simultaneously trying to select clients from the same pool. In this paper, we propose a first-of-its-kind Fairness-aware Federated Job Scheduling (FairFedJS) approach to bridge this gap. Based on Lyapunov optimization, it ensures fair allocation of high-demand FL client datasets to FL jobs in need of them, by jointly considering the current demand and the job payment bids, in order to prevent prolonged waiting. Extensive experiments comparing FairFedJS against four state-of-the-art approaches on two datasets demonstrate its significant advantages. It outperforms the best baseline by 31.9% and 1.0% on average in terms of scheduling fairness and convergence time, respectively, while achieving comparable test accuracy.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. “Noise-robust speech recognition with 10 minutes unparalleled in-domain data,” in ICASSP, 2022, pp. 4298–4302.
  2. Paul Voigt and Axel von dem Bussche, The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Practical Guide, Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 1st edition, 2017.
  3. Peter Kairouz et al., “Advances and open problems in federated learning,” Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, vol. 14, no. 1-2, pp. 1–210, 2021.
  4. Federated Learning, Springer, Cham, 2020.
  5. T. Nishio and Ryo Yonetani, “Client selection for federated learning with heterogeneous resources in mobile edge,” in ICC, 2019, pp. 1–7.
  6. “An efficiency-boosting client selection scheme for federated learning with fairness guarantee,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1552–1564, 2020.
  7. “Fairness-aware client selection for federated learning,” in ICME, 2023, pp. 324–329.
  8. “MetaFed: Federated learning among federations with cyclic knowledge distillation for personalized healthcare,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2023.
  9. “Efficient device scheduling with multi-job federated learning,” in AAAI, 2022, pp. 9971–9979.
  10. “Confederated learning: Federated learning with decentralized edge servers,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 71, pp. 248–263, 2023.
  11. “Reputation-aware opportunistic budget optimization for auction-based federation learning,” in IJCNN, 2023, pp. 1–8.
  12. “Multi-job intelligent scheduling with cross-device federated learning,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 535–551, 2022.
  13. Han Yu et al., “Mitigating herding in hierarchical crowdsourcing networks,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 4, 2016.
  14. Han Yu et al., “Algorithmic management for improving collective productivity in crowdsourcing,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 12541, 2017.
  15. “Reputation-aware task allocation for human trustees,” in The 13th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS’14), 2014, pp. 357–364.
  16. “Filtering trust opinions through reinforcement learning,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 66, pp. 102–113, 2014.
  17. “Towards fairness-aware federated learning,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2023.
  18. “The beta reputation system,” in Proceedings of the 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, 2002, pp. 2502–2511.
  19. “Client selection in federated learning: Convergence analysis and power-of-choice selection strategies,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.01243, 2020.
  20. “Dynamic pricing with limited competitor information in a multi-agent economy,” in CoopIS, 2000, pp. 299–310.
  21. Markov chains and stochastic stability, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
  22. “FedSDG-FS: Efficient and secure feature selection for vertical federated learning,” in INFOCOM, 2023.
  23. “Semi-supervised federated heterogeneous transfer learning,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 252, pp. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109384, 2022.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets