Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Graph Neural Networks for Surfactant Multi-Property Prediction (2401.01874v1)

Published 3 Jan 2024 in physics.chem-ph and cs.LG

Abstract: Surfactants are of high importance in different industrial sectors such as cosmetics, detergents, oil recovery and drug delivery systems. Therefore, many quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models have been developed for surfactants. Each predictive model typically focuses on one surfactant class, mostly nonionics. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have exhibited a great predictive performance for property prediction of ionic liquids, polymers and drugs in general. Specifically for surfactants, GNNs can successfully predict critical micelle concentration (CMC), a key surfactant property associated with micellization. A key factor in the predictive ability of QSPR and GNN models is the data available for training. Based on extensive literature search, we create the largest available CMC database with 429 molecules and the first large data collection for surface excess concentration ($\Gamma$${m}$), another surfactant property associated with foaming, with 164 molecules. Then, we develop GNN models to predict the CMC and $\Gamma$${m}$ and we explore different learning approaches, i.e., single- and multi-task learning, as well as different training strategies, namely ensemble and transfer learning. We find that a multi-task GNN with ensemble learning trained on all $\Gamma$$_{m}$ and CMC data performs best. Finally, we test the ability of our CMC model to generalize on industrial grade pure component surfactants. The GNN yields highly accurate predictions for CMC, showing great potential for future industrial applications.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (71)
  1. Microbial biosurfactants in cosmetic and personal skincare pharmaceutical formulations. Pharmaceutics, 12.
  2. Effect of chemical structure on the cloud point of some new non-ionic surfactants based on bisphenol in relation to their surface active properties. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 20(2):59–66.
  3. Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24(2):123–140.
  4. Multitask learning on graph neural networks applied to molecular property predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.13124.
  5. Caruana, R. (1997). Multitask learning. Machine Learning, 28(1):41–75.
  6. Learning phrase representations using rnn encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078.
  7. Crawshaw, M. (2020). Multi-task learning with deep neural networks: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.09796.
  8. Relationship of structure to properties of surfactants. 13. surface and thermodynamic properties of some oxyethylenated sulfates and sulfonates. J. Phys. Chem., 90(11):2413–2418.
  9. Dietterich, T. G. (2000). Ensemble methods in machine learning. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems, MCS ’00, page 1–15, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer-Verlag.
  10. Deepgamma: A deep learning model for activity coefficient prediction. 1st Annual AAAI Workshop on AI to Accelerate Science and Engineering (AI2ASE).
  11. Fast graph representation learning with pytorch geometric. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.02428v3.
  12. Light-scattering studies on dodecylpyridinium halides. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 21(5):522–533.
  13. Fortune Business Insights (2021). Surfactants Market Size, Share & COVID-19 Impact Analysis, By Type (Anionic, Nonionic, Cationic, and Amphoteric), By Application (Home Care, Personal Care, Textile, Food & Beverages, Industrial & Institutional Cleaning, Plastics, and Others), and Regional Forecast, 2021-2028. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/surfactants-market-102385 (accessed 30-12-2023).
  14. Surfactant technology applied toward an active pharmaceutical ingredient: more than a simple green chemistry advance. Green Chem., 18.
  15. Ensemble deep learning: A review. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 115:105151.
  16. New qspr models to predict the critical micelle concentration of sugar-based surfactants. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 55(45):11716–11726.
  17. Polymeric micelles in drug delivery: An insight of the techniques for their characterization and assessment in biorelevant conditions. Journal of Controlled Release, 332:312–336.
  18. Neural message passing for quantum chemistry. 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2017, 3:2053–2070.
  19. Accurate thermochemistry with small data sets: A bond additivity correction and transfer learning approach. J. Phys. Chem. A, 123(27):5826–5835.
  20. Adaptive transfer learning on graph neural networks. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, KDD ’21, page 565–574, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
  21. Using pre-training can improve model robustness and uncertainty. In Chaudhuri, K. and Salakhutdinov, R., editors, Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 97 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 2712–2721. PMLR.
  22. A review on progress in qspr studies for surfactants. International journal of molecular sciences, 11:1020–47.
  23. Micellar properties of sodium alkyl sulfoacetates and sodium dialkyl sulfosuccinates in water. Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 62:280–284.
  24. Qspr study of critical micelle concentrations of nonionic surfactants. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47(23):9687–9695.
  25. Equilibrium and transport properties of alkylpyridinium bromides. Langmuir, 15(15):5023–5028.
  26. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980.
  27. Poly(ethylene glycol) in drug delivery: Pros and cons as well as potential alternatives. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 49(36):6288–6308.
  28. Investigating transfer learning in graph neural networks. Electronics, 11(8).
  29. Critical investigation of zwitterionic surfactant for enhanced oil recovery from both sandstone and carbonate reservoirs: Adsorption, wettability alteration and imbibition studies. Chemical Engineering Science, 209:115222.
  30. Foamstability: The interplay between salt-, surfactant- and critical micelle concentration. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 187:106871.
  31. Modeling of the critical micelle concentration (cmc) of nonionic surfactants with an extended group-contribution method. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52(34):12236–12246.
  32. Evaluation of non-ambiguous critical micelle concentration of surfactants in relation to solution behaviors of pure and mixed surfactant systems: A physicochemical documentary and analysis. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 24(4):535–549.
  33. Critical micelle concentrations of aqueous surfactant systems. Technical report, National Standard reference data system.
  34. Myers, D. (August 2020). Surfactant Science and Technology, 4th Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  35. Biosurfactants in food industry. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 18(5):252–259.
  36. Microcalorimetric study of some short-chain nonionic surfactants. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 203(2):477–484.
  37. Comparison of the α𝛼\alphaitalic_α and β𝛽\betaitalic_β isomeric forms of the detergent n-dodecyl-d-maltoside for solubilizing photosynthetic complexes from pea thylakoid membranes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, 1817(8):1506–1515. Photosynthesis Research for Sustainability: From Natural to Artificial.
  38. Multi-task graph neural networks for simultaneous prediction of global and atomic properties in ferromagnetic systems*. Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 3(2):025007.
  39. On the measurement of critical micelle concentrations of pure and technical-grade nonionic surfactants. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 3(1):53–58.
  40. Kinetics of micellization: Its significance to technological processes. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 176:3–16.
  41. Correlation among chemical structure, surface properties and cytotoxicity of n-acyl alanine and serine surfactants. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 109:93–102.
  42. Surfactant self-assembling and critical micelle concentration: One approach fits all? Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 36:5745–5753.
  43. A review of polymeric micelles and their applications. Polymers, 14.
  44. Predicting critical micelle concentrations for surfactants using graph convolutional neural networks. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B, 125:10610–10620.
  45. Graph neural networks for temperature-dependent activity coefficient prediction of solutes in ionic liquids. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 171:108153.
  46. Gibbs-Duhem-informed neural networks for binary activity coefficient prediction. Digital Discovery, 2:1752–1767.
  47. Graph neural networks for the prediction of molecular structure-property relationships. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.04852.
  48. Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena: Rosen/Surfactants 4E. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  49. Relationship of structure to properties in surfactants. 10. surface and thermodynamic properties of 2-dodecyloxypoly(ethenoxyethanol)s, c12h25(oc2h4)xoh, in aqueous solution. J. Phys. Chem., 86(4):541–545.
  50. Relationship of structure to properties in surfactants. 11. surface and thermodynamic properties of n-dodecyl-pyridinium bromide and chloride. Colloids and Surfaces, 5(2):159–172.
  51. Ruder, S. (2017). An overview of multi-task learning in deep neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.05098.
  52. Graph neural networks for the prediction of infinite dilution activity coefficients. Digital Discovery, 1:216–225.
  53. Surfactants and their applications. Annu. Rep. Prog. Chem., Sect. C: Phys. Chem., 99:3–48.
  54. Graph neural networks for prediction of fuel ignition quality. Energy & Fuels, 34(9):11395–11407.
  55. Machine learning hybrid approach for the prediction of surface tension profiles of hydrocarbon surfactants in aqueous solution. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 625:328–339.
  56. Surfactants: Recent advances and their applications. Composites Communications, 22:100537.
  57. Dynamic edge-conditioned filters in convolutional neural networks on graphs. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 29–38.
  58. The role of critical micellization concentration in efficacy and toxicity of supramolecular polymers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117:4518–4526.
  59. Sucrose esters as natural surfactants in drug delivery systems—a mini-review. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 433(1):1–9.
  60. Tadros, T. (2005). Surfactants in Personal Care and Cosmetics, chapter 12, pages 399–432. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  61. A generalized theoretical model for the relationship between critical micelle concentrations, pressure, and temperature for surfactants. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 23(2):273–303.
  62. Shampoo science: A review of the physiochemical processes behind the function of a shampoo. Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, 224(3):2200420.
  63. An overview of current research and developments in biosurfactants. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 100:1–18.
  64. Significance of surface excess concentration in the kinetics of surfactant-induced pore wetting in membrane distillation. Desalination, 450:46–53.
  65. Weininger, D. (1988). Smiles, a chemical language and information system. 1. introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 28(1):31–36.
  66. A compact review of molecular property prediction with graph neural networks. Drug Discovery Today: Technologies, 37:1–12.
  67. Analyzing learned molecular representations for property prediction. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 59(8):3370–3388. PMID: 31361484.
  68. Chapter thirteen - a guide to differential scanning calorimetry of membrane and soluble proteins in detergents. In Feig, A. L., editor, Calorimetry, volume 567 of Methods in Enzymology, pages 319–358. Academic Press.
  69. Adsorption of different types of surfactants on graphene oxide. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 276:338–346.
  70. A survey on multi-task learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34:5586–5609.
  71. A comprehensive survey on transfer learning. Proceedings of the IEEE, PP:1–34.
Citations (5)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets