Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Gradient-based Planning with World Models (2312.17227v1)

Published 28 Dec 2023 in cs.LG and cs.AI

Abstract: The enduring challenge in the field of artificial intelligence has been the control of systems to achieve desired behaviours. While for systems governed by straightforward dynamics equations, methods like Linear Quadratic Regulation (LQR) have historically proven highly effective, most real-world tasks, which require a general problem-solver, demand world models with dynamics that cannot be easily described by simple equations. Consequently, these models must be learned from data using neural networks. Most model predictive control (MPC) algorithms designed for visual world models have traditionally explored gradient-free population-based optimisation methods, such as Cross Entropy and Model Predictive Path Integral (MPPI) for planning. However, we present an exploration of a gradient-based alternative that fully leverages the differentiability of the world model. In our study, we conduct a comparative analysis between our method and other MPC-based alternatives, as well as policy-based algorithms. In a sample-efficient setting, our method achieves on par or superior performance compared to the alternative approaches in most tasks. Additionally, we introduce a hybrid model that combines policy networks and gradient-based MPC, which outperforms pure policy based methods thereby holding promise for Gradient-based planning with world models in complex real-world tasks.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (37)
  1. A. Argenson and G. Dulac-Arnold. Model-based offline planning. (arXiv:2008.05556), Mar. 2021. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.05556. arXiv:2008.05556 [cs, eess, stat].
  2. K. Arulkumaran. Planet pytorch. https://github.com/Kaixhin/PlaNet/, 2021.
  3. Vicreg: Variance-invariance-covariance regularization for self-supervised learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.04906, 2021.
  4. The arcade learning environment: An evaluation platform for general agents. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 47:253–279, jun 2013. doi: 10.1613/jair.3912. URL https://doi.org/10.1613%2Fjair.3912.
  5. Model-predictive control via cross-entropy and gradient-based optimization. In Learning for Dynamics and Control, pages 277–286. PMLR, 2020.
  6. Adaptive linear quadratic control using policy iteration. In Proceedings of 1994 American Control Conference-ACC’94, volume 3, pages 3475–3479. IEEE, 1994.
  7. Transdreamer: Reinforcement learning with transformer world models, 2022.
  8. Learning phrase representations using rnn encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078, 2014.
  9. Deep reinforcement learning in a handful of trials using probabilistic dynamics models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018.
  10. Generalization and regularization in dqn, 2020.
  11. Byol-explore: Exploration by bootstrapped prediction. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:31855–31870, 2022.
  12. D. Ha and J. Schmidhuber. World models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.10122, 2018.
  13. Soft actor-critic: Off-policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor. In International conference on machine learning, pages 1861–1870. PMLR, 2018.
  14. Dream to control: Learning behaviors by latent imagination. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.01603, 2019a.
  15. Learning latent dynamics for planning from pixels. In International conference on machine learning, pages 2555–2565. PMLR, 2019b.
  16. Deep hierarchical planning from pixels. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:26091–26104, 2022.
  17. Mastering diverse domains through world models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.04104, 2023.
  18. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
  19. D. P. Kingma and M. Welling. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013.
  20. Curl: Contrastive unsupervised representations for reinforcement learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 5639–5650. PMLR, 2020.
  21. Y. LeCun. A path towards autonomous machine intelligence version 0.9. 2, 2022-06-27. Open Review, 62, 2022.
  22. Convolutional networks for images, speech, and time series. The handbook of brain theory and neural networks, 3361(10):1995, 1995.
  23. Transformers are sample efficient world models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.00588, 2022.
  24. Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.5602, 2013.
  25. M. Morari and J. H. Lee. Model predictive control: past, present and future. Computers & chemical engineering, 23(4-5):667–682, 1999.
  26. Transformer-based world models are happy with 100k interactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07109, 2023.
  27. R. Y. Rubinstein. Optimization of computer simulation models with rare events. European Journal of Operational Research, 99(1):89–112, 1997.
  28. Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347, 2017.
  29. Data-efficient reinforcement learning with momentum predictive representations. CoRR, abs/2007.05929, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.05929.
  30. Masked world models for visual control. In Conference on Robot Learning, pages 1332–1344. PMLR, 2023.
  31. Joint embedding predictive architectures focus on slow features. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.10831, 2022.
  32. Observational overfitting in reinforcement learning, 2019.
  33. R. S. Sutton. Dyna, an integrated architecture for learning, planning, and reacting. SIGART Bull., 2:160–163, 1990. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:207162288.
  34. Deepmind control suite, 2018.
  35. Y. Urakami. Dreamer pytorch. https://github.com/yusukeurakami/dreamer-pytorch, 2022.
  36. Aggressive driving with model predictive path integral control. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 1433–1440. IEEE, 2016.
  37. D. Yarats. Soft actor-critic (sac) implementation in pytorch. https://github.com/denisyarats/pytorch_sac, 2019.
Citations (3)

Summary

  • The paper introduces gradient-based MPC that leverages backpropagation through learned world models to optimize action planning.
  • It employs a hybrid model combining policy networks with gradient descent refinement, yielding superior performance on tasks like Cartpole Swingup.
  • Experimental results demonstrate enhanced sample efficiency and scalability to high-dimensional action spaces in complex control environments.

Gradient-Based Planning with World Models

Introduction

The paper "Gradient-based Planning with World Models" (2312.17227) presents a novel approach to addressing the enduring challenge in AI: control of systems to achieve desired behaviors. Traditional methods like Linear Quadratic Regulation (LQR) rely on simple equations to describe system dynamics, which are not applicable to the complex environments typical in real-world tasks. This research proposes leveraging learned world models via neural networks, focusing specifically on gradient-based Model Predictive Control (MPC). The authors introduce a hybrid model that synergizes policy networks with gradient-based MPC, demonstrating improved performance in various tasks.

Methodology

The primary contribution of this paper is the exploration and implementation of gradient-based MPC. Traditional MPC methods often employ gradient-free optimization techniques such as Cross Entropy and Model Predictive Path Integral (MPPI) for planning. These methods, while effective, tend to be computationally intensive and do not exploit the differentiability inherent in neural network-based world models.

Gradient-Based Model Predictive Control (Grad-MPC): The approach outlined involves deriving optimal actions by back-propagating through the learned world model and performing gradient descent.

  • World Model Architecture: Utilizes a Recurrent State Space Model (RSSM) to predict state transitions. This model integrates both deterministic and stochastic state components, leveraging variational inference and gradient descent for model optimization.
  • Planning Mechanism: Planning is implemented by generating Gaussian-sampled action trajectories, simulating future states using the world model, and optimizing actions to maximize expected rewards through gradient descent iterations. Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1: Gradient based Planning with world models.

Hybrid Model (Policy + Grad-MPC): The integration of policy networks with gradient-based MPC aims to capitalize on the memory efficiency of neural networks while mitigating the limitations of policy networks in sparse environments. Hybrid planning initializes trajectories with policy network outputs, refining them using gradient-based optimization.

Experimental Results

The experimentation focuses on testing Grad-MPC and the hybrid model in various environments from the DeepMind Control Suite. Comparative analysis against baseline methods such as Cross-Entropy and policy-based methods (including Dreamer and SAC) was conducted.

  • Performance Metrics: The paper reports superior performance in sample efficiency for Grad-MPC on tasks like Cartpole Swingup, Reacher Easy, and Finger Spin, among others. The hybrid model demonstrates enhanced performance in sparse reward environments. Figure 2

    Figure 2: Test Rewards of Grad-MPC in 150k env steps. These rewards are calculated over 10 test episodes across three random seeds. Dotted lines represent the performance of PlaNet and Dreamer at 100K steps.

  • Scalability: Grad-MPC exhibits robustness in scaling to high-dimensional action spaces, which is often a bottleneck for gradient-free methods.

Discussion

While the gradient-based approach shows promise, it is not without limitations. The susceptibility to local minima remains a concern, especially in complex environments with diversified state distributions. The hybrid model addresses part of this challenge by combining offline planning prowess with detailed local optimization capabilities.

Future Work: Potential improvements include hierarchical reinforcement learning frameworks that decompose complex tasks into simplified sub-tasks, suitable for Grad-MPC. Additionally, further enhancements could stem from integrating robust world modeling and regularization techniques. Figure 3

Figure 3: Effect of number of Grad-MPC candidates(number of sampled trajectories) on performance for each environment(150 episodes=150k environment steps) across a single seed.

Conclusion

This paper's exploration of gradient-based planning models marks a significant stride towards efficient, scalable, and generalizable AI control systems. The hybridization with policy networks offers a compelling solution to inherent challenges in model-based reinforcement learning. Future endeavors in refining these methodologies and enhancing their applicability to complex real-world scenarios could pioneer advancements in AI-driven automation.

Whiteboard

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 4 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.

HackerNews