Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 56 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 39 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 99 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 155 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 476 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

PerfectTailor: Scale-Preserving 2D Pattern Adjustment Driven by 3D Garment Editing (2312.08386v2)

Published 12 Dec 2023 in cs.GR

Abstract: We address the problem of modifying a given well-designed 2D sewing pattern to accommodate garment edits in the 3D space. Existing methods usually adjust the sewing pattern by applying uniform flattening to the 3D garment. The problems are twofold: first, it ignores local scaling of the 2D sewing pattern such as shrinking ribs of cuffs; second, it does not respect the implicit design rules and conventions of the industry, such as the use of straight edges for simplicity and precision in sewing. To address those problems, we present a pattern adjustment method that considers the non-uniform local scaling of the 2D sewing pattern by utilizing the intrinsic scale matrix. In addition, we preserve the original boundary shape by an as-similar-as-possible geometric constraint when desirable. We build a prototype with a set of commonly used alteration operations and showcase the capability of our method via a number of alteration examples throughout the paper.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (16)
  1. A. Bartle, A. Sheffer, V. G. Kim, D. M. Kaufman, N. Vining, and F. Berthouzoz, “ Physics-driven pattern adjustment for direct 3D garment editing,” ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 50–1, 2016. (journal)
  2. R. Brouet, A. Sheffer, L. Boissieux, and M. P. Cani, “ Design preserving garment transfer,” ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1–11, 2012. (journal)
  3. T. Igarashi, S. Matsuoka, and H. Tanaka, “Teddy: a sketching interface for 3D freeform design,” ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)., pp. 409–-416, 1999. (journal)
  4. T. Igarashi, T. Moscovich, and J. F. Hughes, “As-rigid-as-possible shape manipulation,” ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1134–1141, 2005. (journal)
  5. N. Pietroni, C. Dumery, R. Falque, M. Liu, T. Vidal-Calleja, and O. Sorkine-Hornung, “Computational pattern making from 3D garment models,” ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1–14, 2022. (journal)
  6. N. Sharp, and K. Crane, “Variational surface cutting,” ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1–13, 2018. (journal)
  7. A. Sheffer, B. Lévy, M. Mogilnitsky, and A. Bogomyakov, “ABF++: fast and robust angle based flattening,” ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 311–330, 2005. (journal)
  8. A. Sheffer, E. Praun, and K. Rose, “Mesh parameterization methods and their applications,” Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graphics and Vision., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 105–171, 2007. (journal)
  9. N. Umetani, D. M. Kaufman, T. Igarashi, and E. Grinspun, “Sensitive couture for interactive garment modeling and editing,” ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1–12, 2011. (journal)
  10. K. Wolff, P. Herholz, V. Ziegler, F. Link, N. Brügel, and O, Sorkine-Hornung, “Designing Personalized Garments with Body Movement,” Computer Graphics Forum., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 180–194, 2023. (journal)
  11. A. Sheffer, B. Lévy, M. Mogilnitsky, and A.Bogomyakov, “ABF++: fast and robust angle based flattening,” ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 311–330, 2005. (journal)
  12. O. Sorkine, and M.Alexa, “As-rigid-as-possible surface modeling,” Symposium on Geometry processing. Vol. 4, pp. 109–116, 2007. (journal)
  13. L. Liu, L. Zhang, Y. Xu, C. Gotsman, and S.J. Gortler, “A local/global approach to mesh parameterization,” Computer graphics forum., Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 1495–1504, 2008. (journal)
  14. J. McCartney, B.K. Hinds, and B.L. Seow, “The flattening of triangulated surfaces incorporating darts and gussets,” Computer-Aided Design., Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 249–260, 1999. (journal)
  15. C.C. Wang, S.S. Smith, and M.M. Yuen, “Surface flattening based on energy model,” Computer-Aided Design., Vol. 34, No. 11, pp. 823–833, 2002. (journal)
  16. A. Nealen, O. Sorkine, M. Alexa, and D. Cohen-Or, “A sketch-based interface for detail-preserving mesh editing,” ACM Transactions on Graphics., pp. 1142–1147, 2005. (journal)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)