Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 65 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 39 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 97 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 164 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 466 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

On Time-Inconsistency in Mean Field Games (2312.07770v2)

Published 12 Dec 2023 in math.OC, cs.GT, and math.PR

Abstract: We investigate an infinite-horizon time-inconsistent mean-field game (MFG) in a discrete time setting. We first present a classic equilibrium for the MFG and its associated existence result. This classic equilibrium aligns with the conventional equilibrium concept studied in MFG literature when the context is time-consistent. Then we demonstrate that while this equilibrium produces an approximate optimal strategy when applied to the related $N$-agent games, it does so solely in a precommitment sense. Therefore, it cannot function as a genuinely approximate equilibrium strategy from the perspective of a sophisticated agent within the $N$-agent game. To address this limitation, we propose a new consistent equilibrium concept in both the MFG and the $N$-agent game. We show that a consistent equilibrium in the MFG can indeed function as an approximate consistent equilibrium in the $N$-agent game. Additionally, we analyze the convergence of consistent equilibria for $N$-agent games toward a consistent MFG equilibrium as $N$ tends to infinity.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. Equilibria of dynamic games with many players: existence, approximation, and market structure. J. Econom. Theory, 156:269–316, 2015.
  2. Infinite dimensional analysis. Springer, Berlin, third edition, 2006. A hitchhiker’s guide.
  3. Q-learning in regularized mean-field games. Dynamic Games and Applications, 13(1):89–117, 2023.
  4. Mean field control and finite agent approximation for regime-switching jump diffusions. Applied Mathematics & Optimization, 88(2):36, 2023.
  5. Finite state mean field games with wright–fisher common noise as limits of n-player weighted games. Mathematics of Operations Research, 47(4):2840–2890, 2022.
  6. Analysis of a finite state many player game using its master equation. SIAM J. Control Optim., 56(5):3538–3568, 2018.
  7. Existence of markov equilibrium control in discrete time. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.07227, 2023.
  8. Relaxed equilibria for time-inconsistent markov decision processes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04227, 2023.
  9. Time-inconsistent control theory with finance applications. Springer Finance. Springer, Cham, [2021] ©2021.
  10. V. I. Bogachev. Measure theory. Vol. I, II. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007.
  11. Long time results for a weakly interacting particle system in discrete time. Stoch. Anal. Appl., 33(3):429–463, 2015.
  12. The master equation and the convergence problem in mean field games, volume 201 of Annals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2019.
  13. Probabilistic analysis of mean-field games. SIAM J. Control Optim., 51(4):2705–2734, 2013.
  14. Time-inconsistent mean-field optimal stopping: a limit approach. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 528(1):Paper No. 127582, 26, 2023.
  15. Weighted discounting—on group diversity, time-inconsistency, and consequences for investment. J. Econom. Theory, 189:105089, 40, 2020.
  16. Time-consistent portfolio management. SIAM J. Financial Math., 3(1):1–32, 2012.
  17. Markus Fischer. On the connection between symmetric N𝑁Nitalic_N-player games and mean field games. Ann. Appl. Probab., 27(2):757–810, 2017.
  18. Continuous time finite state mean field games. Appl. Math. Optim., 68(1):99–143, 2013.
  19. Learning mean-field games. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
  20. A general framework for learning mean-field games. Math. Oper. Res., 48(2):656–686, 2023.
  21. Strong and weak equilibria for time-inconsistent stochastic control in continuous time. Math. Oper. Res., 46(2):428–451, 2021.
  22. Daniel Lacker. A general characterization of the mean field limit for stochastic differential games. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 165(3-4):581–648, 2016.
  23. Daniel Lacker. Limit theory for controlled McKean-Vlasov dynamics. SIAM J. Control Optim., 55(3):1641–1672, 2017.
  24. Linear-quadratic time-inconsistent mean-field type Stackelberg differential games: time-consistent open-loop solutions. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 66(1):375–382, 2021.
  25. Time-inconsistent mean-field stochastic LQ problem: open-loop time-consistent control. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 63(9):2771–2786, 2018.
  26. Markov-Nash equilibria in mean-field games with discounted cost. SIAM J. Control Optim., 56(6):4256–4287, 2018.
  27. R. H. Strotz. Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. The Review of Economic Studies, 23(3):165–180, 1955.
  28. Time-inconsistent LQ games for large-population systems and applications. J. Optim. Theory Appl., 197(3):1249–1268, 2023.
  29. Policy mirror ascent for efficient and independent learning in mean field games. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 39722–39754. PMLR, 2023.
  30. Jiongmin Yong. Time-inconsistent optimal control problems and the equilibrium HJB equation. Math. Control Relat. Fields, 2(3):271–329, 2012.
  31. Time-inconsistent mean-field stopping problems: A regularized equilibrium approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.00381, 2023.
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.