Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 161 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 108 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 207 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 471 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

GNBG-Generated Test Suite for Box-Constrained Numerical Global Optimization (2312.07034v1)

Published 12 Dec 2023 in math.OC and cs.NE

Abstract: This document introduces a set of 24 box-constrained numerical global optimization problem instances, systematically constructed using the Generalized Numerical Benchmark Generator (GNBG). These instances cover a broad spectrum of problem features, including varying degrees of modality, ruggedness, symmetry, conditioning, variable interaction structures, basin linearity, and deceptiveness. Purposefully designed, this test suite offers varying difficulty levels and problem characteristics, facilitating rigorous evaluation and comparative analysis of optimization algorithms. By presenting these problems, we aim to provide researchers with a structured platform to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their algorithms against challenges with known, controlled characteristics. For reproducibility, the MATLAB source code for this test suite is publicly available.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (13)
  1. V. Beiranvand, W. Hare, and Y. Lucet, “Best practices for comparing optimization algorithms,” Optimization and Engineering, vol. 18, pp. 815–848, 2017.
  2. N. Hansen, A. Auger, R. Ros, O. Mersmann, T. Tušar, and D. Brockhoff, “COCO: A platform for comparing continuous optimizers in a black-box setting,” Optimization Methods and Software, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 114–144, 2021.
  3. L. Mei and Q. Wang, “Structural optimization in civil engineering: a literature review,” Buildings, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 66, 2021.
  4. D. Yazdani, R. Cheng, D. Yazdani, J. Branke, Y. Jin, and X. Yao, “A survey of evolutionary continuous dynamic optimization over two decades – part A,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 609–629, 2021.
  5. ——, “A survey of evolutionary continuous dynamic optimization over two decades – part B,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 630–650, 2021.
  6. A. O. Kusakci and M. Can, “Constrained optimization with evolutionary algorithms: a comprehensive review,” Southeast Europe journal of soft computing, vol. 1, no. 2, 2012.
  7. M. N. Omidvar, X. Li, and X. Yao, “A review of population-based metaheuristics for large-scale black-box global optimization—Part I,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 802–822, 2021.
  8. ——, “A review of population-based metaheuristics for large-scale black-box global optimization—Part II,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 823–843, 2021.
  9. X. Li, M. G. Epitropakis, K. Deb, and A. Engelbrecht, “Seeking multiple solutions: An updated survey on niching methods and their applications,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 518–538, 2016.
  10. N. Saini and S. Saha, “Multi-objective optimization techniques: a survey of the state-of-the-art and applications: Multi-objective optimization techniques,” The European Physical Journal Special Topics, vol. 230, no. 10, pp. 2319–2335, 2021.
  11. N. Hansen, S. Finck, R. Ros, and A. Auger, “Real-parameter black-box optimization benchmarking 2009: Noiseless functions definitions,” Tech. Rep., 2009.
  12. D. Yazdani, “Particle swarm optimization for dynamically changing environments with particular focus on scalability and switching cost,” Ph.D. dissertation, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK, 2018.
  13. D. Yazdani, M. N. Omidvar, J. Branke, T. T. Nguyen, and X. Yao, “Scaling up dynamic optimization problems: A divide-and-conquer approach,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2020.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube