Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 77 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 75 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 220 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Hyperarithmetical Complexity of Infinitary Action Logic with Multiplexing (2312.04091v2)

Published 7 Dec 2023 in math.LO and cs.LO

Abstract: In 2023, Kuznetsov and Speranski introduced infinitary action logic with multiplexing $!m\nabla \mathrm{ACT}\omega$ and proved that the derivability problem for it lies between the $\omega$ and $\omega\omega$ levels of the hyperarithmetical hierarchy. We prove that this problem is $\Delta0{\omega\omega}$-complete under Turing reductions. Namely, we show that it is recursively isomorphic to the satisfaction predicate for computable infinitary formulas of rank less than $\omega\omega$ in the language of arithmetic. As a consequence we prove that the closure ordinal for $!m\nabla \mathrm{ACT}\omega$ equals $\omega\omega$. We also prove that the fragment of $!m\nabla \mathrm{ACT}\omega$ where Kleene star is not allowed to be in the scope of the subexponential is $\Delta0_{\omega\omega}$-complete. Finally, we present a family of logics, which are fragments of $!m\nabla \mathrm{ACT}\omega$, such that the complexity of the $k$-th logic lies between $\Delta0{\omegak}$ and $\Delta0_{\omega{k+1}}$.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (10)
  1. Computable structures and the hyperarithmetical hierarchy. Elsevier, 2000.
  2. String-Rewriting Systems, pages 35–64. Springer New York, New York, NY, 1993.
  3. Tree-automatic well-founded trees. In S. Barry Cooper, Anuj Dawar, and Benedikt Löwe, editors, How the World Computes, pages 363–373, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  4. Stepan L. Kuznetsov. Complexity of a fragment of infinitary action logic with exponential via non-well-founded proofs. In Anupam Das and Sara Negri, editors, Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods, pages 317–334, Cham, 2021. Springer International Publishing.
  5. Infinitary action logic with exponentiation. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 173(2):103057, 2022.
  6. Infinitary action logic with multiplexing. Stud Logica, 111(2):251–280, 2023.
  7. Anaphora and ellipsis in Lambek calculus with a relevant modality: Syntax and semantics, 2021.
  8. Antonio Montalbán. Computable structure theory: Beyond the arithmetic. Draft, 2023.
  9. Ewa Palka. An infinitary sequent system for the equational theory of *-continuous action lattices. Fundam. Informaticae, 78(2):295–309, 2007.
  10. H. Rogers. Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability. Higher Mathematics Series. McGraw-Hill, 1967.
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com