Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 97 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 180 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 435 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Faster Sublinear-Time Edit Distance (2312.01759v1)

Published 4 Dec 2023 in cs.DS

Abstract: We study the fundamental problem of approximating the edit distance of two strings. After an extensive line of research led to the development of a constant-factor approximation algorithm in almost-linear time, recent years have witnessed a notable shift in focus towards sublinear-time algorithms. Here, the task is typically formalized as the $(k, K)$-gap edit distance problem: Distinguish whether the edit distance of two strings is at most $k$ or more than $K$. Surprisingly, it is still possible to compute meaningful approximations in this challenging regime. Nevertheless, in almost all previous work, truly sublinear running time of $O(n{1-\varepsilon})$ (for a constant $\varepsilon > 0$) comes at the price of at least polynomial gap $K \ge k \cdot n{\Omega(\varepsilon)}$. Only recently, [Bringmann, Cassis, Fischer, and Nakos; STOC'22] broke through this barrier and solved the sub-polynomial $(k, k{1+o(1)})$-gap edit distance problem in time $O(n/k + k{4+o(1)})$, which is truly sublinear if $n{\Omega(1)} \le k \le n{\frac14-\Omega(1)}$.The $n/k$ term is inevitable (already for Hamming distance), but it remains an important task to optimize the $\mathrm{poly}(k)$ term and, in general, solve the $(k, k{1+o(1)})$-gap edit distance problem in sublinear-time for larger values of $k$. In this work, we design an improved algorithm for the $(k, k{1+o(1)})$-gap edit distance problem in sublinear time $O(n/k + k{2+o(1)})$, yielding a significant quadratic speed-up over the previous $O(n/k + k{4+o(1)})$-time algorithm. Notably, our algorithm is unconditionally almost-optimal (up to subpolynomial factors) in the regime where $k \leq n{\frac13}$ and improves upon the state of the art for $k \leq n{\frac12-o(1)}$.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube