Questioning Biases in Case Judgment Summaries: Legal Datasets or Large Language Models? (2312.00554v1)

Abstract: The evolution of legal datasets and the advent of LLMs have significantly transformed the legal field, particularly in the generation of case judgment summaries. However, a critical concern arises regarding the potential biases embedded within these summaries. This study scrutinizes the biases present in case judgment summaries produced by legal datasets and LLMs. The research aims to analyze the impact of biases on legal decision making. By interrogating the accuracy, fairness, and implications of biases in these summaries, this study contributes to a better understanding of the role of technology in legal contexts and the implications for justice systems worldwide. In this study, we investigate biases wrt Gender-related keywords, Race-related keywords, Keywords related to crime against women, Country names and religious keywords. The study shows interesting evidences of biases in the outputs generated by the LLMs and pre-trained abstractive summarization models. The reasoning behind these biases needs further studies.