Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Utility Fairness in Contextual Dynamic Pricing with Demand Learning (2311.16528v1)

Published 28 Nov 2023 in stat.ML and cs.LG

Abstract: This paper introduces a novel contextual bandit algorithm for personalized pricing under utility fairness constraints in scenarios with uncertain demand, achieving an optimal regret upper bound. Our approach, which incorporates dynamic pricing and demand learning, addresses the critical challenge of fairness in pricing strategies. We first delve into the static full-information setting to formulate an optimal pricing policy as a constrained optimization problem. Here, we propose an approximation algorithm for efficiently and approximately computing the ideal policy. We also use mathematical analysis and computational studies to characterize the structures of optimal contextual pricing policies subject to fairness constraints, deriving simplified policies which lays the foundations of more in-depth research and extensions. Further, we extend our study to dynamic pricing problems with demand learning, establishing a non-standard regret lower bound that highlights the complexity added by fairness constraints. Our research offers a comprehensive analysis of the cost of fairness and its impact on the balance between utility and revenue maximization. This work represents a step towards integrating ethical considerations into algorithmic efficiency in data-driven dynamic pricing.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (55)
  1. Dynamic pricing for nonperishable products with demand learning. Operations Research, 57(5), 1169–1188.
  2. Personalized dynamic pricing of limited inventories. Operations Research, 57(6), 1523–1531.
  3. Regularized online allocation problems: Fairness and beyond. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning.
  4. Personalized dynamic pricing with machine learning: High-dimensional features and heterogeneous elasticity. Management Science, 67(9), 5549–5568.
  5. Meta dynamic pricing: Transfer learning across experiments. Management Science, 68(3), 1865–1881.
  6. Fair resource allocation in a volatile marketplace. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation.
  7. Dynamic pricing without knowing the demand function: Risk bounds and near-optimal algorithms. Operations Research, 57(6), 1407–1420.
  8. An overview of pricing models for revenue management. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 5(3), 203–229.
  9. Dynamic pricing under a general parametric choice model. Operations Research, 60(4), 965–980.
  10. X-armed bandits. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12(5).
  11. Data-based dynamic pricing and inventory control with censored demand and limited price changes. Operations Research, 68(5), 1445–1456.
  12. Optimal policies for dynamic pricing and inventory control with nonparametric censored demands. Management Science.
  13. Fairer lp-based online allocation via analytic center. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14621v4.
  14. Capacity and pricing management with demand learning. Available at SSRN 4414361.
  15. Nonparametric pricing analytics with customer covariates. Operations Research, 69(3), 974–984.
  16. Real-time dynamic pricing with minimal and flexible price adjustment. Management Science, 62(8), 2437–2455.
  17. Network revenue management with demand learning and fair resource-consumption balancing. Production and Operations Management.
  18. Fairness-aware online price discrimination with nonparametric demand models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.08221.
  19. Differential privacy in personalized pricing with nonparametric demand models. Operations Research, 71(2), 581–602.
  20. A statistical learning approach to personalization in revenue management. Management Science, 68(3), 1923–1937.
  21. Privacy-preserving dynamic personalized pricing with demand learning. Management Science, 68(7), 4878–4898.
  22. A note on tight lower bound for mnl-bandit assortment selection models. Operations Research Letters, 46(5), 534–537.
  23. Why are fairness concerns so important? lessons from a shared last-mile transportation system. Available at SSRN 3168324.
  24. Price discrimination with fairness constraints. Management Science, 68(12), 8536–8552.
  25. Dynamic pricing with fairness constraints. Available at SSRN 3930622.
  26. Den Boer, A. V. (2015). Dynamic pricing and learning: historical origins, current research, and new directions. Surveys in operations research and management science, 20(1), 1–18.
  27. Simultaneously learning and optimizing using controlled variance pricing. Management Science, 60(3), 770–783.
  28. Dynamic pricing in the presence of inventory considerations: Research overview, current practices, and future directions. Management Science, 49(10), 1287–1309.
  29. Policy optimization using semiparametric models for dynamic pricing. Journal of the American Statistical Association (Theory and Methods).
  30. Dynamic pricing with a prior on market response. Operations Research, 58(1), 16–29.
  31. FCA (2018). Fair pricing in financial services. Financial Conduct Authority, United Kingdom, https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/discussion/dp18-09.pdf.
  32. Temporal fairness in learning and earning: Price protection guarantee and phase transitions. In ACM Conference on Economics and Computing (EC).
  33. Optimal dynamic pricing of inventories with stochastic demand over finite horizons. Management Science, 40(8), 999–1020.
  34. Smoothness-adaptive contextual bandits. Operations Research, 70(6), 3198–3216.
  35. Bayesian dynamic pricing policies: Learning and earning under a binary prior distribution. Management Science, 58(3), 570–586.
  36. Smooth contextual bandits: Bridging the parametric and nondifferentiable regret regimes. Operations Research, 70(6), 3261–3281.
  37. Dynamic pricing in high-dimensions. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 20(9), 1–49.
  38. Markdown pricing under unknown demand. Available at SSRN 3861379.
  39. Fairness, welfare, and equity in personalized pricing. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.
  40. Dynamic pricing with an unknown demand model: Asymptotically optimal semi-myopic policies. Operations Research, 62(5), 1142–1167.
  41. Near-optimal bisection search for nonparametric dynamic pricing with inventory constraint. Available at SSRN 2509425.
  42. Pricing multiple products with the multinomial logit and nested logit models: Concavity and implications. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 13(4), 549–563.
  43. Behavior-based pricing: An analysis of the impact of peer induced fairness. Management Science, 62(9), 2705––2721.
  44. Multidimensional binary search for contextual decision-making. Operations Research, 66(5), 1346–1361.
  45. Distribution-free contextual dynamic pricing. Mathematics of Operations Research.
  46. Fair dynamic rationing. Management Science, 69(11), 6818–6836.
  47. Context-based dynamic pricing with online clustering. Production and Operations Management, 31(9), 3559–3575.
  48. Linearly parameterized bandits. Mathematics of Operations Research, 35(2), 395–411.
  49. Phase transitions and cyclic phenomena in bandits with switching constraints. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 32.
  50. Smith, A. (2020). Using artificial intelligence and algorithms. FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection, USA, https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2020/04/using-artificial-intelligence-and-algorithms.
  51. Online regularization towards always-valid high-dimensional dynamic pricing. Journal of the American Statistical Association (Theory and Methods).
  52. Multimodal dynamic pricing. Management Science, 67(10), 6136–6152.
  53. Uncertainty quantification for demand prediction in contextual dynamic pricing. Production and Operations Management, 30(6), 1703–1717.
  54. Close the gaps: A learning-while-doing algorithm for single-product revenue management problems. Operations Research, 62(2), 219–482.
  55. Doubly fair dynamic pricing. In Proceedings of The 26th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics.
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a novel contextual bandit algorithm that integrates fairness constraints into personalized pricing.
  • It formulates optimal pricing as a constrained optimization problem with an efficient approximation in static full-information settings.
  • It extends the analysis to dynamic pricing with demand learning, quantifying the trade-off between fairness and revenue.

The paper "Utility Fairness in Contextual Dynamic Pricing with Demand Learning" investigates the integration of fairness considerations into personalized pricing strategies, under scenarios of uncertain demand. This research is pivotal in addressing the ethical dimensions of pricing algorithms while maintaining algorithmic efficiency.

Key Contributions:

  1. Novel Contextual Bandit Algorithm: The authors propose a new algorithm that adapts to personalization needs, while adhering to fairness constraints. The goal is to formulate an optimal pricing policy that incorporates utility fairness into the dynamic pricing framework.
  2. Framework for Static Full-Information Setting: The research initially focuses on a static setting where full information is available. Here, they approach the optimal pricing policy as a constrained optimization problem. They introduce an approximation algorithm to efficiently compute ideal pricing strategies, which account for fairness constraints without excessive computational overhead.
  3. Characterization of Optimal Policies: Through mathematical analysis and computational studies, the paper explores the structural characterization of optimal contextual pricing policies. Key insights derived include simplified policy structures that could serve as foundational guides for further research and practical implementation.
  4. Extension to Dynamic Pricing with Demand Learning: Beyond the static setting, the research extends to dynamic pricing scenarios where demand learning is crucial. The authors explore the interplay between fairness constraints and learning efficiency, presenting a non-standard regret lower bound. This bound underscores the increased complexity introduced by incorporating fairness.
  5. Cost of Fairness: An in-depth examination of the cost associated with fairness is provided. The analysis considers how fairness constraints affect the equilibrium between utility (representing consumer satisfaction and equity) and revenue maximization. This balance is crucial for developing fair yet profitable pricing strategies.

Implications:

The paper contributes to advancing the integration of ethical considerations into algorithmic decision-making. By embedding utility fairness within the contextual dynamic pricing framework, it proposes a balanced approach that could potentially mitigate biases and inequalities arising from purely profit-driven algorithms. This work serves as an essential step toward making data-driven dynamic pricing strategies more equitable and socially responsible, offering significant implications for both academia and industry applications.

Overall, the paper presents a thorough analysis and introduces practical frameworks that blend fairness with optimization in personalized pricing—a critical evolution in algorithmic pricing methodologies.