Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 168 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 37 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 34 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 99 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 214 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 466 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Estimation of entropy-regularized optimal transport maps between non-compactly supported measures (2311.11934v1)

Published 20 Nov 2023 in stat.ML, cs.IT, cs.LG, math.IT, math.ST, and stat.TH

Abstract: This paper addresses the problem of estimating entropy-regularized optimal transport (EOT) maps with squared-Euclidean cost between source and target measures that are subGaussian. In the case that the target measure is compactly supported or strongly log-concave, we show that for a recently proposed in-sample estimator, the expected squared $L2$-error decays at least as fast as $O(n{-1/3})$ where $n$ is the sample size. For the general subGaussian case we show that the expected $L1$-error decays at least as fast as $O(n{-1/6})$, and in both cases we have polynomial dependence on the regularization parameter. While these results are suboptimal compared to known results in the case of compactness of both the source and target measures (squared $L2$-error converging at a rate $O(n{-1})$) and for when the source is subGaussian while the target is compactly supported (squared $L2$-error converging at a rate $O(n{-1/2})$), their importance lie in eliminating the compact support requirements. The proof technique makes use of a bias-variance decomposition where the variance is controlled using standard concentration of measure results and the bias is handled by T1-transport inequalities along with sample complexity results in estimation of EOT cost under subGaussian assumptions. Our experimental results point to a looseness in controlling the variance terms and we conclude by posing several open problems.

Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube