On the Pauli Spectrum of QAC0 (2311.09631v4)
Abstract: The circuit class $\mathsf{QAC}0$ was introduced by Moore (1999) as a model for constant depth quantum circuits where the gate set includes many-qubit Toffoli gates. Proving lower bounds against such circuits is a longstanding challenge in quantum circuit complexity; in particular, showing that polynomial-size $\mathsf{QAC}0$ cannot compute the parity function has remained an open question for over 20 years. In this work, we identify a notion of the Pauli spectrum of $\mathsf{QAC}0$ circuits, which can be viewed as the quantum analogue of the Fourier spectrum of classical $\mathsf{AC}0$ circuits. We conjecture that the Pauli spectrum of $\mathsf{QAC}0$ circuits satisfies low-degree concentration, in analogy to the famous Linial, Nisan, Mansour theorem on the low-degree Fourier concentration of $\mathsf{AC}0$ circuits. If true, this conjecture immediately implies that polynomial-size $\mathsf{QAC}0$ circuits cannot compute parity. We prove this conjecture for the class of depth-$d$, polynomial-size $\mathsf{QAC}0$ circuits with at most $n{O(1/d)}$ auxiliary qubits. We obtain new circuit lower bounds and learning results as applications: this class of circuits cannot correctly compute - the $n$-bit parity function on more than $(\frac{1}{2} + 2{-\Omega(n{1/d})})$-fraction of inputs, and - the $n$-bit majority function on more than $(1 - \Omega(n{-1/2}))$-fraction of inputs. Additionally we show that this class of $\mathsf{QAC}0$ circuits with limited auxiliary qubits can be learned with quasipolynomial sample complexity, giving the first learning result for $\mathsf{QAC}0$ circuits. More broadly, our results add evidence that "Pauli-analytic" techniques can be a powerful tool in studying quantum circuits.
- NLTS Hamiltonians from good quantum codes. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 1090–1096, 2023.
- A polynomial-time classical algorithm for noisy random circuit sampling. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2023, page 945–957, New York, NY, USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery.
- Hand-waving and interpretive dance: an introductory course on tensor networks. Journal of physics A: Mathematical and theoretical, 50(22):223001, 2017.
- Computing with a full memory: Catalytic space. In Proceedings of the Forty-Sixth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’14, page 857–866, New York, NY, USA, 2014. Association for Computing Machinery.
- Small depth quantum circuits. ACM SIGACT News, 38(2):35–50, 2007.
- Eric Blais. Testing juntas nearly optimally. In Proceedings of the Forty-First Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’09, page 151–158, New York, NY, USA, 2009. Association for Computing Machinery.
- A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays. Nature, 604(7906):451–456, 2022.
- Ravi B Boppana. The average sensitivity of bounded-depth circuits. Information processing letters, 63(5):257–261, 1997.
- M. Braverman. Poly-logarithmic independence fools AC0𝐴superscript𝐶0AC^{0}italic_A italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT circuits. In Proc. 24th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC), pages 3–8, 2009.
- Nearly optimal algorithms for testing and learning quantum junta channels. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.12097, 2023.
- Matthias C. Caro. Learning quantum processes and hamiltonians via the pauli transfer matrix, 2023.
- Exponential separations between learning with and without quantum memory. In 2021 IEEE 62nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 574–585, 2022.
- Pseudorandom generators from polarizing random walks. Theory of Computing, 15(1):1–26, 2019.
- Pseudorandom generators from the second Fourier level and applications to AC0 with parity gates. In 10th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2019). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 2018.
- Testing and learning quantum juntas nearly optimally. In Proceedings of the 2023 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 1163–1185. SIAM, 2023.
- Local Hamiltonians whose ground states are hard to approximate. In 2017 IEEE 58th annual symposium on foundations of computer science (FOCS), pages 427–438. IEEE, 2017.
- Low-degree learning and the metric entropy of polynomials. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.09659, 2022.
- Quantum lower bounds for fanout. arXiv preprint quant-ph/0312208, 2003.
- Monotonicity testing over general poset domains. In Proceedings of the thiry-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 474–483, 2002.
- Parity, circuits, and the polynomial-time hierarchy. Mathematical Systems Theory, 17(1):13–27, 1984.
- Implementing a fast unbounded quantum fanout gate using power-law interactions. Physical Review Research, 4(4):L042016, 2022.
- Quantum fan-out: Circuit optimizations and technology modeling. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), pages 276–290. IEEE, 2021.
- Noise sensitivity of Boolean functions and percolation, volume 5. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
- J. Håstad. Computational Limitations for Small Depth Circuits. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986.
- Johan Håstad. A slight sharpening of LMN. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 63(3):498–508, 2001.
- Johan Håstad. On the correlation of parity and small-depth circuits. SIAM Journal on Computing, 43(5):1699–1708, 2014.
- Learning to predict arbitrary quantum processes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.14894, 2022.
- Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements. Nature Physics, 16(10):1050–1057, October 2020.
- Quantum fan-out is powerful. Theory of computing, 1(1):81–103, 2005.
- A satisfiability algorithm for AC0𝐴𝐶0AC0italic_A italic_C 0. In Proceedings of the twenty-third annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 961–972. SIAM, 2012.
- Michael Kharitonov. Cryptographic hardness of distribution-specific learning. In Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 372–381, 1993.
- Agnostically learning halfspaces. In Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 11–20, 2005.
- E. Kushilevitz and Y. Mansour. Learning decision trees using the Fourier spectrum. SIAM J. on Computing, 22(6):1331–1348, 1993.
- On monotonicity testing and boolean isoperimetric-type theorems. SIAM J. Comput., 47(6):2238–2276, 2018.
- Zeph Landau. Tensor networks and quantum algorithms, 2014. Tutorial at the Simons Institute for the Theory of Computing. Available here.
- Debbie Wun Chi Leung. Towards robust quantum computation. PhD thesis, Stanford University, California, January 2000.
- Constant depth circuits, Fourier transform and learnability. Journal of the ACM, 40(3):607–620, 1993.
- Hardness of classically simulating the one-clean-qubit model. Physical review letters, 112(13):130502, 2014.
- Quantum boolean functions. arXiv preprint arXiv:0810.2435, 2008.
- Cristopher Moore. Quantum circuits: Fanout, parity, and counting. arXiv preprint quant-ph/9903046, 1999.
- Quantum-process tomography: Resource analysis of different strategies. Phys. Rev. A, 77:032322, Mar 2008.
- Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
- Hardness vs randomness. Journal of computer and System Sciences, 49(2):149–167, 1994.
- Ryan O’Donnell. Analysis of Boolean Functions. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
- Depth-2 QAC circuits cannot simulate quantum parity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.12169, 2020.
- Alexander A Razborov. Lower bounds on the size of bounded depth circuits over a complete basis with logical addition. Mathematical Notes of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 41(4):333–338, 1987.
- Gregory Rosenthal. Bounds on the QAC0𝑄𝐴𝐶0QAC0italic_Q italic_A italic_C 0 Complexity of Approximating Parity. In James R. Lee, editor, 12th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2021), volume 185 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), pages 32:1–32:20, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2021. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik.
- Characterizing midcircuit measurements on a superconducting qubit using gate set tomography. Physical Review Applied, 17(1):014014, 2022.
- Oracle separation of BQP and PH. ACM Journal of the ACM (JACM), 69(4):1–21, 2022.
- Quantum Talagrand, KKL and Friedgut’s theorems and the learnability of quantum Boolean functions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.07279, 2022.
- Joseph Slote. Parity vs. ac0 with simple quantum preprocessing. In 15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2024). Schloss-Dagstuhl-Leibniz Zentrum für Informatik, 2024.
- P. Smolensky. Information processing in dynamical systems: Foundations of harmony theory. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, et al., editors, Parallel Distributed Processing: Volume 1: Foundations, pages 194–281. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1987.
- Noncommutative Bohnenblust-Hille inequality in the Heisenberg-Weyl and Gell-Mann bases with applications to fast learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.01438, 2023.
- Avishay Tal. Tight bounds on the Fourier spectrum of AC0𝐴𝐶0AC0italic_A italic_C 0. In 32nd Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2017). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 2017.
- Renyi-entropic bounds on quantum communication. arXiv preprint quant-ph/0204093, 2002.
- Efficiently preparing Schrödinger’s cat, fractons and non-Abelian topological order in quantum devices. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.03061, 2021.
- Noncommutative Bohnenblust–Hille inequalities. Mathematische Annalen, pages 1–20, 2023.
- Guoming Wang. Property testing of unitary operators. Physical Review A, 84(5):052328, 2011.
- John Watrous. The theory of quantum information. Cambridge university press, 2018.
- Mark M. Wilde. Quantum Information Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2017.
- A. Yao. Separating the polynomial time hierarchy by oracles. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 1–10, 1985.