Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 42 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 17 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 217 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 474 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Sync Pure Counterfactual Regret Minimization in Incomplete Information Extensive Form Games (2311.07155v1)

Published 13 Nov 2023 in cs.GT

Abstract: Counterfactual Regret Minimization (CFR) and its variants developed based upon Regret Matching (RM) have been considered to be the best method to solve incomplete information extensive form games. In addition to RM and CFR, Fictitious Play (FP) is another equilibrium computation algorithm in normal form games. Previous experience has shown that the convergence rate of FP is slower than RM and FP is difficult to use in extensive form games. However, recent research has made improvements in both issues. Firstly, Abernethy proposed a new FP variant sync FP, which has faster convergence rate than RM+. Secondly, Qi introduced FP into extensive form games and proposed Pure CFR (PCFR). This paper combines these two improvements, resulting in a new algorithm sync PCFR. In our experiment, the convergence rate of sync PCFR is approximately an order of magnitude faster than CFR+ (state-of-the-art algorithm for equilibrium computation in incomplete information extensive form games), while requiring less memory in an iteration.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)