Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 28 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 197 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 471 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Sampler Scheduler for Diffusion Models (2311.06845v1)

Published 12 Nov 2023 in cs.CV and cs.LG

Abstract: Diffusion modeling (DM) has high-quality generative performance, and the sampling problem is an important part of the DM performance. Thanks to efficient differential equation solvers, the sampling speed can be reduced while higher sampling quality is guaranteed. However, currently, there is a contradiction in samplers for diffusion-based generative models: the mainstream sampler choices are diverse, each with its own characteristics in terms of performance. However, only a single sampler algorithm can be specified on all sampling steps in the generative process. This often makes one torn between sampler choices; in other words, it makes it difficult to fully utilize the advantages of each sampler. In this paper, we propose the feasibility of using different samplers (ODE/SDE) on different sampling steps of the same sampling process based on analyzing and generalizing the updating formulas of each mainstream sampler, and experimentally demonstrate that such a multi-sampler scheduling improves the sampling results to some extent. In particular, we also verify that the combination of using SDE in the early sampling steps and ODE in the later sampling steps solves the inherent problems previously caused by using both singly. We show that our design changes improve the sampling efficiency and quality in previous work. For instance, when Number of Function Evaluations (NFE) = 24, the ODE Sampler Scheduler achieves a FID score of 1.91 on the CIFAR-10 dataset, compared to 2.02 for DPM++ 2M, 1.97 for DPM2, and 11.90 for Heun for the same NFE. Meanwhile the Sampler Scheduler with the combined scheduling of SDE and ODE reaches 1.899, compared to 18.63 for Euler a, 3.14 for DPM2 a and 23.14 for DPM++ SDE.

Citations (2)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)