Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 163 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 35 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 125 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 208 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 445 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Sampler Scheduler for Diffusion Models (2311.06845v1)

Published 12 Nov 2023 in cs.CV and cs.LG

Abstract: Diffusion modeling (DM) has high-quality generative performance, and the sampling problem is an important part of the DM performance. Thanks to efficient differential equation solvers, the sampling speed can be reduced while higher sampling quality is guaranteed. However, currently, there is a contradiction in samplers for diffusion-based generative models: the mainstream sampler choices are diverse, each with its own characteristics in terms of performance. However, only a single sampler algorithm can be specified on all sampling steps in the generative process. This often makes one torn between sampler choices; in other words, it makes it difficult to fully utilize the advantages of each sampler. In this paper, we propose the feasibility of using different samplers (ODE/SDE) on different sampling steps of the same sampling process based on analyzing and generalizing the updating formulas of each mainstream sampler, and experimentally demonstrate that such a multi-sampler scheduling improves the sampling results to some extent. In particular, we also verify that the combination of using SDE in the early sampling steps and ODE in the later sampling steps solves the inherent problems previously caused by using both singly. We show that our design changes improve the sampling efficiency and quality in previous work. For instance, when Number of Function Evaluations (NFE) = 24, the ODE Sampler Scheduler achieves a FID score of 1.91 on the CIFAR-10 dataset, compared to 2.02 for DPM++ 2M, 1.97 for DPM2, and 11.90 for Heun for the same NFE. Meanwhile the Sampler Scheduler with the combined scheduling of SDE and ODE reaches 1.899, compared to 18.63 for Euler a, 3.14 for DPM2 a and 23.14 for DPM++ SDE.

Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube