Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 37 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 10 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 84 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 198 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 448 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 31 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Fast Algorithms for Separable Linear Programs (2310.16351v1)

Published 25 Oct 2023 in cs.DS

Abstract: In numerical linear algebra, considerable effort has been devoted to obtaining faster algorithms for linear systems whose underlying matrices exhibit structural properties. A prominent success story is the method of generalized nested dissection~[Lipton-Rose-Tarjan'79] for separable matrices. On the other hand, the majority of recent developments in the design of efficient linear program (LP) solves do not leverage the ideas underlying these faster linear system solvers nor consider the separable structure of the constraint matrix. We give a faster algorithm for separable linear programs. Specifically, we consider LPs of the form $\min_{\mathbf{A}\mathbf{x}=\mathbf{b}, \mathbf{l}\leq\mathbf{x}\leq\mathbf{u}} \mathbf{c}\top\mathbf{x}$, where the graphical support of the constraint matrix $\mathbf{A} \in \mathbb{R}{n\times m}$ is $O(n\alpha)$-separable. These include flow problems on planar graphs and low treewidth matrices among others. We present an $\tilde{O}((m+m{1/2 + 2\alpha}) \log(1/\epsilon))$ time algorithm for these LPs, where $\epsilon$ is the relative accuracy of the solution. Our new solver has two important implications: for the $k$-multicommodity flow problem on planar graphs, we obtain an algorithm running in $\tilde{O}(k{5/2} m{3/2})$ time in the high accuracy regime; and when the support of $\mathbf{A}$ is $O(n\alpha)$-separable with $\alpha \leq 1/4$, our algorithm runs in $\tilde{O}(m)$ time, which is nearly optimal. The latter significantly improves upon the natural approach of combining interior point methods and nested dissection, whose time complexity is lower bounded by $\Omega(\sqrt{m}(m+m{\alpha\omega}))=\Omega(m{3/2})$, where $\omega$ is the matrix multiplication constant. Lastly, in the setting of low-treewidth LPs, we recover the results of [DLY,STOC21] and [GS,22] with significantly simpler data structure machinery.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.