Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 45 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 22 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 99 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 183 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 467 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Shape Optimization by Constrained First-Order Least Mean Approximation (2309.13595v2)

Published 24 Sep 2023 in math.NA and cs.NA

Abstract: In this work, the problem of shape optimization, subject to PDE constraints, is reformulated as an $Lp$ best approximation problem under divergence constraints to the shape tensor introduced in Laurain and Sturm: ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 50 (2016). More precisely, the main result of this paper states that the $Lp$ distance of the above approximation problem is equal to the dual norm of the shape derivative considered as a functional on $W{1,p\ast}$ (where $1/p + 1/p\ast = 1$). This implies that for any given shape, one can evaluate its distance from being a stationary one with respect to the shape derivative by simply solving the associated $Lp$-type least mean approximation problem. Moreover, the Lagrange multiplier for the divergence constraint turns out to be the shape deformation of steepest descent. This provides a way, as an alternative to the approach by Deckelnick, Herbert and Hinze: ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 28 (2022), for computing shape gradients in $W{1,p\ast}$ for $p\ast \in ( 2 , \infty )$. The discretization of the least mean approximation problem is done with (lowest-order) matrix-valued Raviart-Thomas finite element spaces leading to piecewise constant approximations of the shape deformation acting as Lagrange multiplier. Admissible deformations in $W{1,p\ast}$ to be used in a shape gradient iteration are reconstructed locally. Our computational results confirm that the $Lp$ distance of the best approximation does indeed measure the distance of the considered shape to optimality. Also confirmed by our computational tests are the observations that choosing $p\ast$ (much) larger than 2 (which means that $p$ must be close to 1 in our best approximation problem) decreases the chance of encountering mesh degeneracy during the shape gradient iteration.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)