Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 37 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 90 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 179 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Automated grading workflows for providing personalized feedback to open-ended data science assignments (2309.12924v2)

Published 18 Aug 2023 in physics.ed-ph, cs.CY, and stat.OT

Abstract: Open-ended assignments - such as lab reports and semester-long projects - provide data science and statistics students with opportunities for developing communication, critical thinking, and creativity skills. However, providing grades and formative feedback to open-ended assignments can be very time consuming and difficult to do consistently across students. In this paper, we discuss the steps of a typical grading workflow and highlight which steps can be automated in an approach that we call automated grading workflow. We illustrate how gradetools, a new R package, implements this approach within RStudio to facilitate efficient and consistent grading while providing individualized feedback. By outlining the motivations behind the development of this package and the considerations underlying its design, we hope this article will provide data science and statistics educators with ideas for improving their grading workflows, possibly developing new grading tools or considering use gradetools as their grading workflow assistant.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (13)
  1. Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
  2. Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572132. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572132
  3. R package version 1.0.1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/moodleR/index.html
  4. GAISE (2016), ‘Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE): College report’. http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise
  5. R package version 2.0.0. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gmailr/index.html
  6. _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/sta4.452. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sta4.452
  7. Lipnevich, A. A. & Smith, J. K. (2009), ‘“i really need feedback to learn:” students’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the differential feedback messages’, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21, 347–367.
  8. Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2018.1564638. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2018.1564638
  9. Version 3.2.1. https://github.com/ucbds-infra/otter-grader
  10. R package version 0.0.0.9001. https://github.com/daranzolin/rcanvas/tree/master
  11. R package version 0.2.0. https://github.com/federicazoe/gradetools
  12. R package version 0.2.1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ghclass/index.html
  13. R package version 0.10.1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/learnr/index.html
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.