Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 168 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 122 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 188 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 464 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Automated grading workflows for providing personalized feedback to open-ended data science assignments (2309.12924v2)

Published 18 Aug 2023 in physics.ed-ph, cs.CY, and stat.OT

Abstract: Open-ended assignments - such as lab reports and semester-long projects - provide data science and statistics students with opportunities for developing communication, critical thinking, and creativity skills. However, providing grades and formative feedback to open-ended assignments can be very time consuming and difficult to do consistently across students. In this paper, we discuss the steps of a typical grading workflow and highlight which steps can be automated in an approach that we call automated grading workflow. We illustrate how gradetools, a new R package, implements this approach within RStudio to facilitate efficient and consistent grading while providing individualized feedback. By outlining the motivations behind the development of this package and the considerations underlying its design, we hope this article will provide data science and statistics educators with ideas for improving their grading workflows, possibly developing new grading tools or considering use gradetools as their grading workflow assistant.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (13)
  1. Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
  2. Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572132. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572132
  3. R package version 1.0.1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/moodleR/index.html
  4. GAISE (2016), ‘Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE): College report’. http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise
  5. R package version 2.0.0. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gmailr/index.html
  6. _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/sta4.452. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sta4.452
  7. Lipnevich, A. A. & Smith, J. K. (2009), ‘“i really need feedback to learn:” students’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the differential feedback messages’, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21, 347–367.
  8. Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2018.1564638. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2018.1564638
  9. Version 3.2.1. https://github.com/ucbds-infra/otter-grader
  10. R package version 0.0.0.9001. https://github.com/daranzolin/rcanvas/tree/master
  11. R package version 0.2.0. https://github.com/federicazoe/gradetools
  12. R package version 0.2.1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ghclass/index.html
  13. R package version 0.10.1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/learnr/index.html

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.