Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 48 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 205 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 473 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Popularity Degradation Bias in Local Music Recommendation (2309.11671v1)

Published 20 Sep 2023 in cs.IR and cs.LG

Abstract: In this paper, we study the effect of popularity degradation bias in the context of local music recommendations. Specifically, we examine how accurate two top-performing recommendation algorithms, Weight Relevance Matrix Factorization (WRMF) and Multinomial Variational Autoencoder (Mult-VAE), are at recommending artists as a function of artist popularity. We find that both algorithms improve recommendation performance for more popular artists and, as such, exhibit popularity degradation bias. While both algorithms produce a similar level of performance for more popular artists, Mult-VAE shows better relative performance for less popular artists. This suggests that this algorithm should be preferred for local (long-tail) music artist recommendation.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (18)
  1. C. Anderson. 2004. The Long Tail. Wired Magazine (2004). http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.10/tail.html
  2. Community Well-Being, Post-Industrial Music Cities and the Turn to Popular Music Heritage. In Music Cities. Springer, 43–61.
  3. Are we really making much progress? A worrying analysis of recent neural recommendation approaches. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 101–109.
  4. Titan Music Group (Firm). 2015. The Austin Music Census: A Data-Driven Assessment of Austin’s Commercial Music Economy. Titan Music Group, LLC. https://books.google.com/books?id=fStOjwEACAAJ
  5. Leo A Goodman. 1961. Snowball Sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32, 1 (1961), 148–170.
  6. Neural collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web. 173–182.
  7. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. Ieee, 263–272.
  8. Diederik Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2015. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). San Diega, CA, USA.
  9. Variational autoencoders for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 2018 world wide web conference. 689–698.
  10. Xia Ning and George Karypis. 2011. Slim: Sparse Linear Methods for Top-N Recommender Systems. In 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE, 497–506.
  11. Steve Oakes and Gary Warnaby. 2011. Conceptualizing the Management and Consumption of Live Music in Urban Space. Marketing Theory 11, 4 (2011), 405–418.
  12. Neural collaborative filtering vs. matrix factorization revisited. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 240–248.
  13. Music Recommendation Systems: Techniques, Use Cases, and Challenges. In Recommender Systems Handbook (3rd edition), Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach, and Bracha Shapira (Eds.). Springer, New York, NY, 927–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2197-4_24
  14. Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. The journal of machine learning research 15, 1 (2014), 1929–1958.
  16. Harald Steck. 2011. Item popularity and recommendation accuracy. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems. 125–132.
  17. Localify.org: Locally-focus Music Artist and Event Recommendation. In 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys 2023.
  18. Towards Quantifying the Strength of Music Scenes Using Live Event Data. Population 18 (2022), 21.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.