Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Exploring Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Techniques for Code Generation with Large Language Models (2308.10462v3)

Published 21 Aug 2023 in cs.SE, cs.CL, and cs.LG

Abstract: LLMs demonstrate impressive capabilities to generate accurate code snippets given natural language intents in a zero-shot manner, i.e., without the need for specific fine-tuning. While prior studies have highlighted the advantages of fine-tuning LLMs, this process incurs high computational costs, making it impractical in resource-scarce environments, particularly for models with billions of parameters. To address these challenges, previous research explored in-context learning (ICL) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) as strategies to guide the LLM generative process with task-specific prompt examples. However, ICL and RAG introduce inconveniences, such as the need for designing contextually relevant prompts and the absence of learning task-specific parameters, thereby limiting downstream task performance. In this context, we foresee parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) as a promising approach to efficiently specialize LLMs to task-specific data while maintaining reasonable resource consumption. In this paper, we deliver a comprehensive study of PEFT techniques for LLMs in the context of automated code generation. Our comprehensive investigation of PEFT techniques for LLMs reveals their superiority and potential over ICL and RAG across a diverse set of LLMs and three representative Python code generation datasets: Conala, CodeAlpacaPy, and APPS. Furthermore, our study highlights the potential for tuning larger LLMs and significant reductions in memory usage by combining PEFT with quantization. Therefore, this study opens opportunities for broader applications of PEFT in software engineering scenarios. Our code is available at https://github.com/martin-wey/peft-LLM-code/.

Citations (18)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that PEFT techniques, particularly LoRA and QLoRA, significantly lower computational costs while maintaining or enhancing code generation performance.
  • It compares various fine-tuning methods using datasets like CoNaLa and CodeAlpacaPy, with noticeable gains in metrics such as Exact Match and CodeBLEU.
  • The study reveals that joint training with a unified LoRA adapter can match separate fine-tuning performance, thus streamlining resource usage and simplifying deployment.

Exploring Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Techniques for Code Generation with LLMs

Introduction

LLMs have emerged as powerful tools in automated code generation, capable of producing syntactically correct code snippets from natural language intents. However, the traditional full fine-tuning approach to adapt these models to specific tasks is hindered by substantial computational costs, particularly for models with billions of parameters. This paper investigates Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) techniques as cost-effective alternatives to enhance LLM specialization for code generation tasks. These techniques promise to maintain the benefits of task-specific fine-tuning while being computationally feasible in resource-constrained environments.

Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Techniques

The study compares several PEFT techniques, including LoRA, IA3, Prompt tuning, Prefix tuning, and QLoRA, against traditional methods like In-Context Learning (ICL) and full fine-tuning. LoRA, which involves injecting low-rank trainable matrices into the attention layers, is highlighted as particularly effective, dramatically reducing the number of trainable parameters while maintaining or improving model effectiveness compared to full fine-tuning. Figure 1

Figure 1: Peak GPU memory consumption during the fine-tuning of models using full fine-tuning (ft), LoRA, and QLoRA.

Dataset and Evaluation Metrics

The research relies on two datasets: CoNaLa, sourced from StackOverflow, and CodeAlpacaPy, a curated compilation from the CodeAlpaca dataset focused on Python code. These datasets provide ample examples for training and evaluation, representing diverse code generation scenarios. Key metrics used for evaluation include Exact Match (EM), EM@kk, and CodeBLEU, which capture the precision of code generation and its alignment with the intended functionality. Figure 2

Figure 2: Token length distribution of CoNala and CodeAlpacaPy.

Results and Comparative Analysis

The experimental results demonstrate that LLMs fine-tuned with PEFT techniques significantly outperform small LLMs and the ICL approach. For instance, LLMs with LoRA exhibit a substantial improvement in EM@kk, showcasing the effectiveness of parameter-efficient approaches in adapting larger models to specific datasets. The study also explores joint training using a single LoRA adapter, finding that this approach achieves comparable effectiveness to separate fine-tuning, thereby reducing complexity and storage demands during inference. Figure 3

Figure 3: [RQ2] -- Comparison of the effectiveness of the models using LoRA and ICL on CoNala (top) and CodeAlpacaPy (bottom).

Resource Optimization Through QLoRA

QLoRA combines LoRA with model quantization, further reducing computational resources required for fine-tuning LLMs. The study successfully demonstrates the tuning of models as large as 34 billion parameters within a 24GB GPU memory constraint, highlighting QLoRA's ability to reduce memory consumption significantly—up to a two-fold decrease compared to LoRA—while maintaining or improving model effectiveness. Figure 4

Figure 4: [RQ4] -- Performance of CodeLlama models using LoRA and QLoRA with 8-bit and 4-bit quantization. The cost of all the assessed techniques and models remains within the limit of our constrained computational budget.

Implications and Future Work

The implications of this research are profound for software engineering, particularly in contexts where computational resources are limited. By leveraging PEFT, developers and researchers can efficiently adapt LLMs to nuanced coding tasks, democratizing advanced model tuning techniques. Future work could explore PEFT applications in other software engineering domains, such as automated code review or documentation generation, and in multi-tasking or continual learning scenarios.

Conclusion

This study provides compelling evidence for the advantages of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning techniques in code generation tasks with LLMs. The reduction in computational costs while maintaining high performance opens new possibilities for utilizing LLMs without necessitating extensive infrastructure. As such, PEFT techniques present a valuable direction for future research and application in artificial intelligence and software development.

Whiteboard

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.