Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 37 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 90 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 179 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Stochastic Degree Sequence Model with Edge Constraints (SDSM-EC) for Backbone Extraction (2307.12828v2)

Published 24 Jul 2023 in cs.SI and stat.OT

Abstract: It is common to use the projection of a bipartite network to measure a unipartite network of interest. For example, scientific collaboration networks are often measured using a co-authorship network, which is the projection of a bipartite author-paper network. Caution is required when interpreting the edge weights that appear in such projections. However, backbone models offer a solution by providing a formal statistical method for evaluating when an edge in a projection is statistically significantly strong. In this paper, we propose an extension to the existing Stochastic Degree Sequence Model (SDSM) that allows the null model to include edge constraints (EC) such as prohibited edges. We demonstrate the new SDSM-EC in toy data and empirical data on young children's' play interactions, illustrating how it correctly omits noisy edges from the backbone.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (17)
  1. Burris, V.: Interlocking directorates and political cohesion among corporate elites. American Journal of Sociology 111(1), 249–283 (2005). 10.1086/428817
  2. Journal of Complex Networks 10(6), cnac049 (2022). 10.1093/comnet/cnac049
  3. Social Development 27(2), 335–350 (2018). doi.org/10.1111/sode.12271
  4. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 33, 267–281 (2005). 10.1007/s10802-005-3564-6
  5. Social Networks 30(1), 31–48 (2008). 10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.006
  6. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 60, 394–402 (2022). 10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.04.003
  7. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 113(4), 627 (2017). 10.1037/pspp0000135
  8. Social Networks 71, 80–86 (2022). 10.1016/j.socnet.2022.07.002
  9. Social Networks 39, 84–97 (2014). 10.1016/j.socnet.2014.06.001
  10. Neal, Z.P.: backbone: An r package to extract network backbones. PloS one 17(5), e0269,137 (2022). 10.1371/journal.pone.0269137
  11. Scientific Reports 11(1), 1–13 (2021). 10.1038/s41598-021-03238-3
  12. Newman, M.E.: Scientific collaboration networks. i. network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E 64(1), 016,131 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016131
  13. Tech. rep., Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Statistics; Nuffield College (2023). R package version 1.3.14.4. https://www.cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RSiena/
  14. Scientific Reports 5(1), 1–18 (2015). 10.1038/srep10595
  15. New Journal of Physics 19(5), 053,022 (2017). 10.1088/1367-2630/aa6b38
  16. Ecology 99(1), 103–115 (2018). 10.1002/ecy.2043
  17. Social Network Analysis and Mining 1(3), 187–218 (2011). 10.1007/s13278-011-0021-0
Citations (1)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.