Comparative Evaluation of Memory Technologies for Synaptic Crossbar Arrays -- Part I: Robustness-driven Device-Circuit Co-Design and System Implications (2307.04261v2)
Abstract: In-memory computing (IMC) utilizing synaptic crossbar arrays is promising for energy-efficient deep neural network (DNN) accelerators. Various technologies (CMOS and post-CMOS) have been explored as synaptic device candidates, each with its own pros and cons. In this work, we perform a design space exploration and comparative evaluation of four technologies viz. 8T SRAMs, ferroelectric transistors (FeFETs), resistive RAMs (ReRAMs) and spin-orbit torque magnetic RAMs (SOT-MRAMs) in the context of IMC robustness and DNN accuracy. For a fair comparison, we carefully optimize each technology specifically for synaptic crossbar design accounting for device and circuit non-idealities. By integrating different technologies into a cross-layer simulation flow based on physical models of synaptic devices and interconnects, we present insights into various device-circuit interactions. Based on the optimized designs, we obtain inference results for ResNet-20 on CIFAR-10 dataset. Among the four technologies, we show that FeFETs-based DNNs achieve the highest accuracy (followed closely by ReRAMs) and the largest resilience to process variations due to the compactness and high ON/OFF current ratio of FeFET bit-cells. In Part II of this paper, we expand the technology evaluation considering various device-circuit design knobs used for crossbar arrays.
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.