Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 44 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 86 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 208 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

RecallM: An Adaptable Memory Mechanism with Temporal Understanding for Large Language Models (2307.02738v3)

Published 6 Jul 2023 in cs.AI, cs.CL, and cs.SC

Abstract: LLMs have made extraordinary progress in the field of Artificial Intelligence and have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a large variety of tasks and domains. However, as we venture closer to creating AGI systems, we recognize the need to supplement LLMs with long-term memory to overcome the context window limitation and more importantly, to create a foundation for sustained reasoning, cumulative learning and long-term user interaction. In this paper we propose RecaLLM, a novel architecture for providing LLMs with an adaptable and updatable long-term memory mechanism. Unlike previous methods, the RecaLLM architecture is particularly effective at belief updating and maintaining a temporal understanding of the knowledge provided to it. We demonstrate through various experiments the effectiveness of this architecture. Furthermore, through our own temporal understanding and belief updating experiments, we show that RecaLLM is four times more effective than using a vector database for updating knowledge previously stored in long-term memory. We also demonstrate that RecaLLM shows competitive performance on general question-answering and in-context learning tasks.

Citations (2)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that RecallM significantly enhances belief updating with a fourfold improvement in temporal understanding over vector databases.
  • The methodology employs a hybrid neuro-symbolic approach using POS tagging and a graph database for efficient concept extraction and context storage.
  • Experimental results on datasets like TruthfulQA and DuoRC illustrate RecallM’s robust capabilities in overcoming limitations of traditional LLM architectures.

Enhancing Long-Term Memory in LLMs with the RecaLLM Architecture

Introduction to RecaLLM

LLMs represent a significant leap in AI capabilities, yet their potential is hampered by inherent limitations in long-term memory and understanding. To address these limitations, the paper presents RecaLLM, a novel architecture that integrates an adaptable, long-term memory mechanism into LLMs, focusing on belief updating and maintaining a nuanced temporal awareness of knowledge.

The Need for RecaLLM

Current attempts to extend the capabilities of LLMs involve augmenting them with vector databases or expanding their context windows. These strategies, while useful, fall short in enabling true cumulative learning and sustained interaction, as they do not aptly handle belief updating or capture temporal relations among concepts. RecaLLM addresses these deficiencies by introducing a hybrid neuro-symbolic approach that leverages a graph database for storing and updating concept relationships and contexts in an efficient manner.

System Architecture and Methodology

RecaLLM employs a knowledge update and question-answering mechanism that altogether enhances the LLM's interaction capabilities. The knowledge update process extracts concepts and their relations from text, using POS tagging for concept identification and a graph database for concept storage. This process ensures that the LLM's knowledge is both expansive and temporally coherent. The question-answering mechanism leverages this stored knowledge, utilizing graph traversal algorithms to retrieve relevant contexts for accurate and context-aware responses.

Experimental Results

The paper details extensive experimentation to validate RecaLLM's effectiveness. These include:

  • Temporal Understanding and Belief Updating: RecaLLM outperforms vector databases significantly, showcasing four times higher effectiveness in knowledge updating tasks.
  • Question Answering: Trials using the TruthfulQA dataset and the DuoRC dataset demonstrate RecaLLM's ability to overcome the intrinsic limitations of LLMs, such as imitative falsehoods and context window constraints.

Implications and Future Directions

RecaLLM's architecture not only addresses the immediate shortfalls in LLMs concerning long-term memory and updating beliefs but also paves the way for more sophisticated AI systems capable of sustained reasoning and learning. The successes of RecaLLM illuminate a path toward more versatile and human-like AI, underscoring the importance of temporal understanding in artificial cognition.

Conclusion

RecaLLM represents a significant step forward in equipping LLMs with long-term memory capabilities, focusing on dynamic knowledge updating and temporal awareness. This architecture opens new avenues for research and development in AI, moving closer to the realization of truly adaptive and continuously learning systems. As we progress, refining RecaLLM's architecture and exploring improvements in concept extraction and context revision will be paramount in overcoming the remaining hurdles toward achieving more reliable and intelligent AI companions.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.