Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 168 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 106 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 181 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 446 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A data-driven kinetic model for opinion dynamics with social network contacts (2307.00906v2)

Published 3 Jul 2023 in physics.soc-ph, cs.NA, and math.NA

Abstract: Opinion dynamics is an important and very active area of research that delves into the complex processes through which individuals form and modify their opinions within a social context. The ability to comprehend and unravel the mechanisms that drive opinion formation is of great significance for predicting a wide range of social phenomena such as political polarization, the diffusion of misinformation, the formation of public consensus, and the emergence of collective behaviors. In this paper, we aim to contribute to that field by introducing a novel mathematical model that specifically accounts for the influence of social media networks on opinion dynamics. With the rise of platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram and many others, social networks have become significant arenas where opinions are shared, discussed, and potentially altered. To this aim after an analytical construction of our new model and through incorporation of real-life data from Twitter, we calibrate the model parameters to accurately reflect the dynamics that unfold in social media, showing in particular the role played by the so-called influencers in driving individual opinions towards predetermined directions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (54)
  1. D. Acemoglu and A. Ozdaglar. Opinion dynamics and learning in social networks. Dynamic Games and Applications, 1, 2011.
  2. A kinetic theory approach to the dynamics of crowd evacuation from bounded domains. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 25(01):109–129, 2015.
  3. Vehicular traffic, crowds, and swarms: from kinetic theory and multiscale methods to applications and research perspectives. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 29(10):1901–2005, 2019.
  4. Opinion dynamics over complex networks: Kinetic modelling and numerical methods. Kinetic & Related Models, 10(1), 2017.
  5. Recent advances in opinion modeling: control and social influence. In Active particles. Vol. 1. Advances in theory, models, and applications, Model. Simul. Sci. Eng. Technol., pages 49–98. Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham, 2017.
  6. Boltzmann-type control of opinion consensus through leaders. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 372(2028):20140138, 18, 2014.
  7. From particles to firms: on the kinetic theory of climbing up evolutionary landscapes. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 30(7):1441–1460, 2020.
  8. Towards a mathematical theory of behavioral human crowds. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 32(2):321–358, 2022.
  9. Spatial spread of COVID-19 outbreak in Italy using multiscale kinetic transport equations with uncertainty. Math. Biosci. Eng., 18(5):7028–7059, 2021.
  10. Inferring interaction rules from observations of evolutive systems i: The variational approach. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 27(05):909–951, 2017.
  11. Modeling and simulating the spatial spread of an epidemic through multiscale kinetic transport equations. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 31(6):1059–1097, 2021.
  12. M. Burger. Network structured kinetic models of social interactions. Vietnam J. Math., 49(3):937–956, 2021.
  13. Data assimilation in price formation. Inverse Problems, 36(6), 2020.
  14. C. Cercignani. The Boltzmann equation and its applications, volume 67 of Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988.
  15. Kinetic models for chemotaxis and their drift-diffusion limits. Springer, 2004.
  16. A. Chatterjee and B. K. Chakrabarti. Kinetic exchange models for income and wealth distributions. The European Physical Journal B, 60:135–149, 2007.
  17. Inference of interaction kernels in mean-field models of opinion dynamics. preprint, 2022.
  18. On a kinetic model for a simple market economy. Journal of Statistical Physics, 120:253–277, 2005.
  19. Modeling opinion dynamics in social networks. Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, 2014.
  20. Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Advances in Complex Systems, 03(01n04):87–98, 2000.
  21. Kinetic models for epidemic dynamics with social heterogeneity. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 83(1):4, 2021.
  22. G. Dimarco and G. Toscani. Kinetic modeling of alcohol consumption. J. Stat. Phys., 177(5):1022–1042, 2019.
  23. G. Dimarco and G. Toscani. Social climbing and Amoroso distribution. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 30(11):2229–2262, 2020.
  24. G. Dimarco and G. Toscani. Social climbing and amoroso distribution. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 30(11):2229–2262, 2020.
  25. Optimal control of epidemic spreading in the presence of social heterogeneity. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A, 380(2224):Paper No. 20210160, 16, 2022.
  26. G. Dimarco and A. Tosin. The Aw-Rascle traffic model: Enskog-type kinetic derivation and generalisations. J. Stat. Phys., 178(1):178–210, 2020.
  27. Kinetic derivation of Aw-Rascle-Zhang-type traffic models with driver-assist vehicles. J. Stat. Phys., 186(1):Paper No. 17, 26, 2022.
  28. M. Dolfin and M. Lachowicz. Modeling opinion dynamics: How the network enhances consensus. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 10(4):877–896, 2015.
  29. Boltzmann and fokker–planck equations modelling opinion formation in the presence of strong leaders. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 465(2112):3687–3708, 2009.
  30. Kinetic models for optimal control of wealth inequalities. Eur. Phys. J. B, 91(10):Paper No. 265, 12, 2018.
  31. Kinetic description of collision avoidance in pedestrian crowds by sidestepping. Kinet. Relat. Models, 11(3):491–520, 2018.
  32. Reproducing kernel hilbert spaces in the mean field limit. Kinetic and Related Models, page in press, 2023.
  33. J. Franceschi and L. Pareschi. Spreading of fake news, competence and learning: kinetic modelling and numerical approximation. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A, 380(2224):Paper No. 20210159, 18, 2022.
  34. Non-maxwellian kinetic equations modeling the dynamics of wealth distribution. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 30(04):685–725, 2020.
  35. Sociophysics: A new approach of sociological collective behaviour. i. mean-behaviour description of a strike. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 9(1):1–13, 1982.
  36. S. Göttlich and C. Totzeck. Parameter calibration with stochastic gradient descent for interacting particle systems driven by neural networks. Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems, pages 1–30, 2022.
  37. An explicitly solvable kinetic model for vehicular traffic and associated macroscopic equations. Mathematical and computer modelling, 35(5-6):591–606, 2002.
  38. R. Hegselmann and U. Krause. Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. Journal of Artifical Societies and Social Simulation (JASSS) vol, 5(3), 2002.
  39. C. Hutto and E. Gilbert. Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 8(1):216–225, May 2014.
  40. D. Kahneman and A. Tversky. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I, pages 99–127. World Scientific, 2013.
  41. Dynamic forecasting performance and liquidity evaluation of financial market by econophysics and bayesian methods. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 588:126546, 2022.
  42. J. Littman and L. Wrubel. Climate change tweets ids, 2019.
  43. Sentiment analysis algorithms and applications: A survey. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 4(5):1093–1113, 2014.
  44. L. Pareschi and G. Toscani. Interacting multiagent systems: kinetic equations and Monte Carlo methods. OUP Oxford, 2013.
  45. L. Pareschi and G. Toscani. Wealth distribution and collective knowledge: a boltzmann approach. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372(2028):20130396, 2014.
  46. Fundamental diagrams in traffic flow: The case of heterogeneous kinetic models. Communications in mathematical sciences, 14:643–669, 02 2016.
  47. K. Sznajd-Weron and J. Sznajd. Opinion evolution in closed community. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 11(06):1157–1165, 2000.
  48. G. Toscani. Kinetic models of opinion formation. Communications in mathematical sciences, 4(3):481–496, 2006.
  49. G. Toscani. A kinetic description of mutation processes in bacteria. Kinetic and Related Models, 6:1043–1055, 2013.
  50. G. Toscani. A multi-agent approach to the impact of epidemic spreading on commercial activities. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 32(10):1931–1948, 2022.
  51. A. Tosin. Kinetic equations and stochastic game theory for social systems. Mathematical models and methods for planet Earth, pages 37–57, 2014.
  52. A data-driven epidemic model with social structure for understanding the COVID-19 infection on a heavily affected Italian province. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 31(12):2533–2570, 2021.
  53. Text classification based on multi-word with support vector machine. Knowledge-Based Systems, 21(8):879–886, 2008.
  54. Sentiment analysis on tweets for social events. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 17th international conference on computer supported cooperative work in design (CSCWD), pages 557–562. IEEE, 2013.
Citations (8)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a kinetic model that leverages Boltzmann equations to capture opinion dynamics driven by social network interactions.
  • It calibrates the model with Twitter data, revealing a log-normal distribution of followers that validates the framework against empirical trends.
  • Numerical experiments demonstrate consensus and polarization scenarios by simulating heterogeneous interaction kernels and bounded confidence models.

A Data-Driven Kinetic Model for Opinion Dynamics with Social Network Contacts

Introduction

In this paper, a new kinetic model is proposed to paper opinion dynamics within social networks. The work extends traditional models by incorporating the influence of social media platforms, like Twitter, on the formation and evolution of opinions. The research highlights the significance of opinion leaders or "influencers" and their widespread reach on social networks in shaping and driving public opinion.

Mathematical Framework

The paper uses a kinetic theory based on Boltzmann equations to describe the distribution and evolution of opinions over time. The model begins by capturing the microscopic level interactions between individuals on a social network and upscales to a mesoscopic framework. Each agent is characterized by a real-valued opinion and the number of followers or connections they possess on the platform.

The model's dynamics are described through several phases:

  1. Network Formation: The model begins with the formation of a network predicated on individuals' attempts to increase their connections, driven by a satisficing number of followers that gives a user satisfaction. Figure 1

    Figure 1: Representation of the social network using a sample of Ns=400N_s = 400 accounts from the data extracted from Twitter.

  2. Opinion Dynamics: These dynamics are governed by a set of interactions where agents update their opinions based on interactions with others. The degree of influence an agent can exert is proportional to their number of connections, effectively modeling the role of influencers.
  3. Fokker-Planck Reformulation: Asymptotic expansions are employed to derive a Fokker-Planck equation, which models the large-scale distribution of opinions. This reflects a quasi-invariant limit where frequent but small interactions drive the dynamics.

Model Calibration and Validation

The model was calibrated using real-world data from Twitter. Specifically, the distribution of followers among a sample of accounts was characterized to help fit model parameters.

Figure 2 illustrates the comparison between the tails of the data distribution from Twitter and the equilibrium distributions of the proposed models. This fit was achieved using a non-linear least squares method, revealing that a log-normal distribution of followers aligns most closely with observed data. Figure 2

Figure 2: Comparison between the tails of the data distribution and the different possible equilibrium distributions of the Fokker-Planck models.

Numerical Experiments

To validate and explore the model behavior, several numerical experiments were conducted:

  1. Bounded Confidence Models: Simulations demonstrated the emergence of opinion clusters and eventual consensus by introducing and varying parameters governing confidence bounds and follower impact.
  2. Heterogeneous Interaction Kernels: The paper explored scenarios where the influence of an opinion was weighted by the confidence bound between interacting agents, delineating scenarios of consensus and polarization.
  3. Sznajd Model Dynamics: This extension considered situations where agents' willingness to align opinions depended on the variance in their confidence levels, highlighting the model’s ability to simulate realistic social dynamics.

Application to Real-World Data

The practical relevance of the model was underscored by its application to actual Twitter data, notably reactions to political events such as Donald Trump's re-admission to Twitter and discussions on climate change. Sentiment analysis using VADER provided a means to quantify opinions into a range suitable for model calibration. The fitting processes showed the model could capture real-world opinion trends with acceptable accuracy.

Conclusion

This research introduces an advanced model that integrates social network structures and opinion dynamics effectively. The incorporation of real-world data and kinetic theory provides a robust framework for understanding how opinions spread and evolve in the presence of influential network dynamics. Future research may focus on extending the model to incorporate additional social metrics and contextual factors, refining the real-world applicability even further.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.