Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 71 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 196 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 467 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Novelty and Lifted Helpful Actions in Generalized Planning (2307.00735v1)

Published 3 Jul 2023 in cs.AI

Abstract: It has been shown recently that successful techniques in classical planning, such as goal-oriented heuristics and landmarks, can improve the ability to compute planning programs for generalized planning (GP) problems. In this work, we introduce the notion of action novelty rank, which computes novelty with respect to a planning program, and propose novelty-based generalized planning solvers, which prune a newly generated planning program if its most frequent action repetition is greater than a given bound $v$, implemented by novelty-based best-first search BFS($v$) and its progressive variant PGP($v$). Besides, we introduce lifted helpful actions in GP derived from action schemes, and propose new evaluation functions and structural program restrictions to scale up the search. Our experiments show that the new algorithms BFS($v$) and PGP($v$) outperform the state-of-the-art in GP over the standard generalized planning benchmarks. Practical findings on the above-mentioned methods in generalized planning are briefly discussed.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. Foundations for Generalized Planning in Unbounded Stochastic Domains. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR, 380–389.
  2. Delete-Relaxation Heuristics for Lifted Classical Planning. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS, 94–102.
  3. Best-First Width Search for Lifted Classical Planning. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS, 11–15.
  4. Dandamudi, S. P. 2005. Installing and Using NASM. Guide to Assembly Language Programming in Linux, 153–166.
  5. An Introduction to the Planning Domain Definition Language. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 13(2): 1–187.
  6. Helmert, M. 2006. The Fast Downward Planning System. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 26: 191–246.
  7. The FF Planning System: Fast Plan Generation through Heuristic Search. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 14: 253–302.
  8. Ordered Landmarks in Planning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 22: 215–278.
  9. Generalized Planning: Synthesizing Plans that Work for Multiple Environments. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI, 918–923.
  10. A Review of Generalized Planning. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 34: e5.
  11. Width-Based Backward Search. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS, 219–224.
  12. Width and Serialization of Classical Planning Problems. In Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI, 540–545.
  13. Best-First Width Search: Exploration and Exploitation in Classical Planning. In Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI, 3590–3596.
  14. On the Extraction, Ordering, and Usage of Landmarks in Planning. In Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Planning, ECP, 37–48.
  15. The LAMA Planner: Guiding Cost-Based Anytime Planning with Landmarks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 39: 127–177.
  16. Scaling-up Generalized Planning as Heuristic Search with Landmarks. In Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Combinatorial Search, SoCS, 171–179.
  17. Representation and Synthesis of C++ Programs for Generalized Planning. arXiv:2206.14480.
  18. Computing Programs for Generalized Planning Using a Classical Planner. Artificial Intelligence, 272: 52–85.
  19. Generalized Planning as Heuristic Search. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS, 569–577.
  20. Approximate Novelty Search. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS, 349–357.
  21. Learning Generalized Plans Using Abstract Counting. In Proceedings of the 23rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI, 991–997.
  22. Directed Search for Generalized Plans Using Classical Planners. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS, 226–233.
  23. Landmark Heuristics for Lifted Classical Planning. In Proceedings of the 31st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI, 4665–4671.
Citations (6)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.