Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 45 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 22 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 99 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 183 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 467 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Efficient and Scalable MIV-transistor with Extended Gate in Monolithic 3D Integration (2306.14033v1)

Published 24 Jun 2023 in eess.SY, cs.ET, and cs.SY

Abstract: Monolithic 3D integration has become a promising solution for future computing needs. The metal inter-layer via (MIV) forms interconnects between substrate layers in Monolithic 3D integration. Despite small size of MIV, the area overhead can become a major limitation for efficient M3D integration and, thus needs to be addressed. Previous works focused on the utilization of the substrate area around MIV to reduce this area overhead significantly but suffers from increased leakage and scaling factors. In this work, we discuss MIV-transistor realization that addresses both leakage and scaling issue along with similar area overhead reduction compared with previous works and, thus can be utilized efficiently. Our simulation results suggest that the leakage current $(I_{D,leak})$ has reduced by $14K\times$ and, the maximum current $(I_{D,max})$ increased by $58\%$ for the proposed MIV-transistor compared with the previous implementation. In addition, performance metrics of the inverter realization with our proposed MIV-transistor specifically the delay, slew time and power consumption reduced by $11.6\%$, $17.9\%$ and, $4.5\%$ respectively compared with the previous implementation with same MIV area overhead reduction.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (15)
  1. J. Jiang, K. Parto et al., “Ultimate Monolithic-3D Integration With 2D Materials: Rationale, Prospects, and Challenges,” IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society, 2019.
  2. P. Batude, L. Brunet et al., “3D Sequential Integration: Application-driven technological achievements and guidelines,” in IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2017.
  3. C. Fenouillet-Beranger, B. Previtali et al., “FDSOI bottom MOSFETs stability versus top transistor thermal budget featuring 3D monolithic integration,” in 44th European Solid State Device Research Conference (ESSDERC), 2014.
  4. ——, “FDSOI bottom MOSFETs stability versus top transistor thermal budget featuring 3D monolithic integration,” in 44th European Solid State Device Research Conference (ESSDERC), 2014.
  5. P. Batude, C. Fenouillet-Beranger et al., “3DVLSI with CoolCube process: An alternative path to scaling,” in Symposium on VLSI Technology (VLSI Technology).   IEEE, 2015.
  6. H. Han, R. Choi et al., “Low temperature and ion-cut based monolithic 3d process integration platform incorporated with cmos, rram and photo-sensor circuits,” in IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM).   IEEE, 2020.
  7. S. K. Samal, D. Nayak et al., “Monolithic 3D IC vs. TSV-based 3D IC in 14nm FinFET technology,” in IEEE SOI-3D-Subthreshold Microelectronics Technology Unified Conference (S3S).   IEEE, 2016.
  8. C. Liu and S. K. Lim, “A design tradeoff study with monolithic 3D integration,” in Thirteenth International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED).   IEEE, 2012.
  9. U. R. Tida, R. Yang et al., “On the efficacy of through-silicon-via inductors,” IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 2014.
  10. U. R. Tida, C. Zhuo, and Y. Shi, “Novel through-silicon-via inductor-based on-chip DC-DC converter designs in 3D ICs,” ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems (JETC), 2014.
  11. P. Batude, B. Sklenard et al., “3D sequential integration opportunities and technology optimization,” in IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference, 2014.
  12. M. S. Vemuri and U. Rao Tida, “Metal Inter-layer Via Keep-out-zone in M3D IC: A Critical Process-aware Design Consideration,” in 24th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), 2023.
  13. ——, “Dual-Purpose Metal Inter-layer Via Utilization in Monolithic Three-Dimensional (M3D) Integration,” in IEEE 63rd International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS), 2020.
  14. U. R. Tida and M. S. Vemuri, “Efficient Metal Inter-Layer Via Utilization Strategies for Three-dimensional Integrated Circuits,” in IEEE 33rd International System-on-Chip Conference (SOCC), 2020.
  15. K. Chang, K. Acharya et al., “Impact and design guideline of monolithic 3-D IC at the 7-nm technology node,” IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 2017.
Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.