Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 83 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 42 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 108 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 220 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 473 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Novelty Accommodating Multi-Agent Planning in High Fidelity Simulated Open World (2306.12654v2)

Published 22 Jun 2023 in cs.AI and cs.MA

Abstract: Autonomous agents operating within real-world environments often rely on automated planners to ascertain optimal actions towards desired goals or the optimization of a specified objective function. Integral to these agents are common architectural components such as schedulers, tasked with determining the timing for executing planned actions, and execution engines, responsible for carrying out these scheduled actions while monitoring their outcomes. We address the significant challenge that arises when unexpected phenomena, termed \textit{novelties}, emerge within the environment, altering its fundamental characteristics, composition, and dynamics. This challenge is inherent in all deployed real-world applications and may manifest suddenly and without prior notice or explanation. The introduction of novelties into the environment can lead to inaccuracies within the planner's internal model, rendering previously generated plans obsolete. Recent research introduced agent design aimed at detecting and adapting to such novelties. However, these designs lack consideration for action scheduling in continuous time-space, coordination of concurrent actions by multiple agents, or memory-based novelty accommodation. Additionally, the application has been primarily demonstrated in lower fidelity environments. In our study, we propose a general purpose AI agent framework designed to detect, characterize, and adapt to novelties in highly noisy, complex, and stochastic environments that support concurrent actions and external scheduling. We showcase the efficacy of our agent through experimentation within a high-fidelity simulator for realistic military scenarios.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. Joshua Alspector. 2021. Representation Edit Distance as a Measure of Novelty. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.02770 (2021).
  2. WS Bell. 2015. Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM). Technical Report. US Air Force Hill AFB United States.
  3. Towards a unifying framework for formal theories of novelty. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 35. 15047–15052.
  4. OpenAI Gym. CoRR abs/1606.01540 (2016). arXiv:1606.01540 http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.01540
  5. Characterizing Novelty in the Military Domain. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2302.12314
  6. Top Gun: Cooperative Multi-Agent Planning. (2023). http://idm-lab.org/wiki/AAAI23-MAPF/index.php/Main/HomePage?action=download&upname=Paper_4.pdf
  7. Evaluating Reinforcement Learning Algorithms For Evolving Military Games. Convergence 200, 44 (2020), 1.
  8. Advanced framework for simulation, integration and modeling (AFSIM)(Case Number: 88ABW-2015-2258). In Proceedings of the international conference on scientific computing (CSC). The Steering Committee of The World Congress in Computer Science, Computer …, 73.
  9. A Goal Reasoning Agent for Controlling UAVs in Beyond-Visual-Range Air Combat.. In IJCAI, Vol. 17. 4714–4721.
  10. Maria Fox and Derek Long. 2006. Modelling mixed discrete-continuous domains for planning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 27 (2006), 235–297.
  11. Novelty Generation Framework for AI Agents in Angry Birds Style Physics Games. In 2021 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG). 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/CoG52621.2021.9619160
  12. Towards Discovery and Attribution of Open-World GAN Generated Images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). 14094–14103.
  13. Larry Holder. 2022. ”HOLDERLB/WSU-Sailon-ng”. "https://github.com/holderlb/WSU-SAILON-NG"
  14. Mayank Kejriwal and Shilpa Thomas. 2021. A multi-agent simulator for generating novelty in monopoly. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 112 (2021), 102364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2021.102364
  15. Robert H Kewley and Mark J. Embrechts. 2002. Computational military tactical planning system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 32, 2 (2002), 161–171.
  16. Pat Langley. 2020. Open-world learning for radically autonomous agents. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 13539–13543.
  17. Semantic Novelty Detection in Natural Language Descriptions. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, 866–882. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.66
  18. Automated planning with special relevance to associate systems technology and mission planning. Technical Report. BDM INTERNATIONAL INC ARLINGTON VA.
  19. A novelty-centric agent architecture for changing worlds. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. 925–933.
  20. OpenMIND: Planning and Adapting in Domains with Novelty. (2021).
  21. Measuring the Performance of Open-World AI Systems. (2020).
  22. Heuristic planning for PDDL+ domains. In Workshops at the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  23. Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig. 2021. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach, global edition 4th. Foundations 19 (2021), 23.
  24. Model-Based Adaptation to Novelty for Open-World AI. In Proceedings of the ICAPS Workshop on Bridging the Gap Between AI Planning and Learning.
  25. Chris Wiegand. 2018. F-35 air vehicle technology overview. In 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. 3368.
  26. David Edward Wilkins and Roberto Desimone. 1993. Applying an AI planner to military operations planning. Citeseer.
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube