Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 47 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 37 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 11 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 195 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 30 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Weighted structure tensor total variation for image denoising (2306.10482v2)

Published 18 Jun 2023 in math.OC, cs.CV, and eess.IV

Abstract: For image denoising problems, the structure tensor total variation (STV)-based models show good performances when compared with other competing regularization approaches. However, the STV regularizer does not couple the local information of the image and may not maintain the image details. Therefore, we employ the anisotropic weighted matrix introduced in the anisotropic total variation (ATV) model to improve the STV model. By applying the weighted matrix to the discrete gradient of the patch-based Jacobian operator in STV, our proposed weighted STV (WSTV) model can effectively capture local information from images and maintain their details during the denoising process. The optimization problem in the model is solved by a fast first-order gradient projection algorithm with a complexity result of $O(1 / i2)$. For images with different Gaussian noise levels, the experimental results demonstrate that the WSTV model can effectively improve the quality of restored images compared to other TV and STV-based models.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. R. Gonzalez, Digital image processing, Pearson education india (2009).
  2. Z.-F. Pang et al., “Image restoration via the adaptive tvp regularization,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications. 80(5), 569-587 (2020).
  3. C. Tian et al., “Deep learning on image denoising: An overview,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications. 131, 251-275 (2020).
  4. M. Elad, B. Kawar, and G. Vaksman, “Image Denoising: The Deep Learning Revolution and Beyond-A Survey Paper,” SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences. 16(3), 1594-1654 (2023).
  5. A. Danielyan, V. Katkovnik, and K. Egiazarian, “BM3D Frames and Variational Image Deblurring,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 21(4), 1715-1728 (2012).
  6. J. Koh, J. Lee, and S. Yoon, “Single-image deblurring with neural networks: A comparative survey,” Computer Vision and Image Understanding. 203, 103134 (2022).
  7. B. Ivanov et al., “Accelerated Dai-Liao projection method for solving systems of monotone nonlinear equations with application to image deblurring,” Journal of Global Optimization. 85(2), 377-420 (2023).
  8. J.-F. Wu et al., “Low Dose CT Image Reconstruction Based on Structure Tensor Total Variation Using Accelerated Fast Iterative Shrinkage Thresholding Algorithm,” Sensors. 20(6), 1647 (2020).
  9. M. Tsuneki et al., “Deep learning models in medical image analysis,” Journal of Oral Biosciences. 64(3), 312-320 (2022).
  10. B.-Z. Chen et al., “TransAttUnet: Multi-Level Attention-Guided U-Net With Transformer for Medical Image Segmentation,” IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence. 1-14 (2023).
  11. C.-Z. Wang et al., “A novel fuzzy hierarchical fusion attention convolution neural network for medical image super-resolution reconstruction,” Information Sciences. 622, 424-436 (2023).
  12. Y. Sui et al., “Scan-Specific Generative Neural Network for MRI Super-Resolution Reconstruction,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 41(6), 1383-1399 (2022).
  13. L. Ma et al., “Unsupervised super-resolution reconstruction of hyperspectral histology images for whole-slide imaging,” Journal of biomedical optics. 27(5), 056502 (2022).
  14. L. Rudin, S. Osher, and E. Fatemi, “Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algo-rithms,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 60(1-4), 259-268 (1992).
  15. C. Vogel, Computational methods for inverse problems, SIAM (2002).
  16. D. Strong and T. Chan, “Edge-preserving and scale-dependent properties of total variation regularization,” IEEE Inverse problems. 19(6), S165 (2003).
  17. M. Lysaker, A. Lundervold, and X.-C. Tai, “Noise removal using fourth-order partial differential equation with applications to medical magnetic resonance images in space and time,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 12(12), 1579-1590 (2003).
  18. I. Chan, A. Marquina, and P. Mulet, “High-order total variation-based image restoration,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. 22(2), 503-516 (2000).
  19. K. Bredies, K. Kunisch, and T. Pock, “Total generalized variation,” SIAM Journal on lmaging Sciences. 3(3), 492-526 (2010).
  20. F. Knoll et al., “Second order total generalized variation (tgv) for mri,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 65(2), 480-491 (2011).
  21. G. Gilboa and S. Osher, “Nonlocal operators with applications to image processing,” Multi-scale Modeling and Simulation. 7(3), 1005-1028 (2009).
  22. S. Lefkimmiatis et al., “Structure tensor total variation,” SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences. 8(2), 1090-1122 (2015).
  23. E. Demircan-Tureyen and M. E. Kamasak, “On the Direction Guidance in Structure Tensor Total Variation Based Denoising,” Iberian Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis. 89-100 (2019).
  24. I. Bayram and M. E. Kamasak, “Directional total variation,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters. 19(12), 781-784 (2012).
  25. Z.-F. Pang et al., “Image denoising via a new anisotropic total-variation-based model,” Signal Processing: Image Communication. 74, 140-152 (2019).
  26. A. Chambolle, “An algorithm for total variation minimization and applications,” Journal of Mathematical imaging and vision. 20, 89-97 (2004).
  27. S. Lefkimmiatis, J. P. Ward, and M. Unser, “Hessian schatten-norm regularization for linear inverse problems,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 22(5), 1873-1888 (2013).
  28. S. Lefkimmiatis and S. Osher, “Nonlocal structure tensor functionals for image regularization,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging. 1(1), 16-29 (2015).
  29. A. Beck and M. Teboulle, “Fast gradient-based algorithms for constrained total variation image denoising and deblurring problems,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 18(11), 2419-2434 (2009).
  30. A. Beck and M. Teboulle, “A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems,” SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences. 2(1), 183-202 (2009).
  31. S. Suvrit, “Fast projections onto ℓ1,qsubscriptℓ1𝑞\ell_{1,q}roman_ℓ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 , italic_q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT-norm balls for grouped feature selection,” Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Springer, Berlin. Vol. 3, 305–317 (2011).
  32. X. Bresson and T. F. Chan, “Fast dual minimization of the vectorial total variation norm and applications to color image processing,” Inverse problems and imaging. 2(4), 455-484 (2008).
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

Explore Trending Papers

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube