Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 152 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 87 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 204 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 429 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Ordinal Potential-based Player Rating (2306.05366v4)

Published 8 Jun 2023 in cs.GT and cs.LG

Abstract: It was recently observed that Elo ratings fail at preserving transitive relations among strategies and therefore cannot correctly extract the transitive component of a game. We provide a characterization of transitive games as a weak variant of ordinal potential games and show that Elo ratings actually do preserve transitivity when computed in the right space, using suitable invertible mappings. Leveraging this insight, we introduce a new game decomposition of an arbitrary game into transitive and cyclic components that is learnt using a neural network-based architecture and that prioritises capturing the sign pattern of the game, namely transitive and cyclic relations among strategies. We link our approach to the known concept of sign-rank, and evaluate our methodology using both toy examples and empirical data from real-world games.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (16)
  1. Sign rank versus VC dimension. In Proc. of COLT, volume 49, pages 47–80.
  2. Open-ended learning in symmetric zero-sum games. In Proc. of ICML, volume 97, pages 434–443.
  3. Re-evaluating evaluation. In Proc. of NeurIPS, pages 3272–3283.
  4. On the limitations of Elo: Real-world games, are transitive, not additive. In Proc. of AISTATS.
  5. Borkar, V. S. (1997). Stochastic approximation with two time scales. Systems & Control Letters.
  6. Flows and Decompositions of Games: Harmonic and Potential Games. Mathematics of Operations Research, 36(3):474–503.
  7. Real world games look like spinning tops. In Proc. of NeurIPS.
  8. Elo, A. (1961). The USCF rating system. Chess Life.
  9. Elo, A. (1978). The rating of Chess players, past and present. Ishi Press International.
  10. Greub, W. H. (1975). Linear algebra. Springer Science & Business Media, 4t⁢hsuperscript4𝑡ℎ4^{th}4 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_t italic_h end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Edition.
  11. Statistical ranking and combinatorial hodge theory. Math. Program., 127(1):203–244.
  12. Nfgtransformer: Equivariant representation learning for normal-form games. In ICLR.
  13. Potential Games. Games and Economic Behavior, 14:124–143.
  14. The sign-rank of AC0. SIAM Journal on Computing, 39(5):1833–1855.
  15. Sismanis, Y. (2010). How I won the “Chess ratings - Elo vs the rest of the world” Competition. CoRR, abs/1012.4571.
  16. The network HHD: quantifying cyclic competition in trait-performance models of tournaments. SIAM Rev., 64(2):360–391.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.