Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Matroid-Constrained Vertex Cover

Published 7 Jun 2023 in cs.DS | (2306.04342v1)

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce the problem of Matroid-Constrained Vertex Cover: given a graph with weights on the edges and a matroid imposed on the vertices, our problem is to choose a subset of vertices that is independent in the matroid, with the objective of maximizing the total weight of covered edges. This problem is a generalization of the much studied max kk-vertex cover problem, in which the matroid is the simple uniform matroid, and it is also a special case of the problem of maximizing a monotone submodular function under a matroid constraint. First, we give a Fixed-Parameter Tractable Approximation Scheme (FPT-AS) when the given matroid is a partition matroid, a laminar matroid, or a transversal matroid. Precisely, if kk is the rank of the matroid, we obtain (1−ε)(1 - \varepsilon) approximation using (1/ε)<sup>O(k)n<sup>O(1)(1/\varepsilon)<sup>{O(k)}n<sup>{O(1)} time for partition and laminar matroids and using (1/ε+k)<sup>O(k)n<sup>O(1)(1/\varepsilon+k)<sup>{O(k)}n<sup>{O(1)} time for transversal matroids. This extends a result of Manurangsi for uniform matroids [Manurangsi, 2018]. We also show that these ideas can be applied in the context of (single-pass) streaming algorithms. Besides, our FPT-AS introduces a new technique based on matroid union, which may be of independent interest in extremal combinatorics. In the second part, we consider general matroids. We propose a simple local search algorithm that guarantees 2/3≈0.662/3 \approx 0.66 approximation. For the more general problem where two matroids are imposed on the vertices and a feasible solution must be a common independent set, we show that a local search algorithm gives a 2/3⋅(1−1/(p+1))2/3 \cdot (1 - 1/(p+1)) approximation in n<sup>O(p)n<sup>{O(p)} time, for any integer pp. We also provide some evidence to show that with the constraint of one or two matroids, the approximation ratio of $2/3$ is likely the best possible, using the currently known techniques of local search.

Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.