Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 41 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 46 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 91 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 178 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 474 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Efficient Algorithms for Constructing Minimum-Weight Codewords in Some Extended Binary BCH Codes (2305.17764v2)

Published 28 May 2023 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: We present $O(m3)$ algorithms for specifying the support of minimum-weight words of extended binary BCH codes of length $n=2m$ and designed distance $d(m,s,i):=2{m-1-s}-2{m-1-i-s}$ for some values of $m,i,s$, where $m$ may grow to infinity. The support is specified as the sum of two sets: a set of $2{2i-1}-2{i-1}$ elements, and a subspace of dimension $m-2i-s$, specified by a basis. In some detail, for designed distance $6\cdot 2j$, we have a deterministic algorithm for even $m\geq 4$, and a probabilistic algorithm with success probability $1-O(2{-m})$ for odd $m>4$. For designed distance $28\cdot 2j$, we have a probabilistic algorithm with success probability $\geq 1/3-O(2{-m/2})$ for even $m\geq 6$. Finally, for designed distance $120\cdot 2j$, we have a deterministic algorithm for $m\geq 8$ divisible by $4$. We also present a construction via Gold functions when $2i|m$. Our construction builds on results of Kasami and Lin (IEEE T-IT, 1972), who proved that for extended binary BCH codes of designed distance $d(m,s,i)$, the minimum distance equals the designed distance. Their proof makes use of a non-constructive result of Berlekamp (Inform. Contrl., 1970), and a constructive down-conversion theorem'' that converts some words in BCH codes to lower-weight words in BCH codes of lower designed distance. Our main contribution is in replacing the non-constructive argument of Berlekamp by a low-complexity algorithm. In one aspect, we extends the results of Grigorescu and Kaufman (IEEE T-IT, 2012), who presented explicit minimum-weight words for designed distance $6$ (and hence also for designed distance $6\cdot 2^j$, by a well-knownup-conversion theorem''), as we cover more cases of the minimum distance. However, the minimum-weight words we construct are not affine generators for designed distance $>6$.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.