Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 64 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 35 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 77 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 174 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 457 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

AURA : Automatic Mask Generator using Randomized Input Sampling for Object Removal (2305.07857v2)

Published 13 May 2023 in cs.CV

Abstract: The objective of the image inpainting task is to fill missing regions of an image in a visually plausible way. Recently, deep-learning-based image inpainting networks have generated outstanding results, and some utilize their models as object removers by masking unwanted objects in an image. However, while trying to better remove objects using their networks, the previous works pay less attention to the importance of the input mask. In this paper, we focus on generating the input mask to better remove objects using the off-the-shelf image inpainting network. We propose an automatic mask generator inspired by the explainable AI (XAI) method, whose output can better remove objects than a semantic segmentation mask. The proposed method generates an importance map using randomly sampled input masks and quantitatively estimated scores of the completed images obtained from the random masks. The output mask is selected by a judge module among the candidate masks which are generated from the importance map. We design the judge module to quantitatively estimate the quality of the object removal results. In addition, we empirically find that the evaluation methods used in the previous works reporting object removal results are not appropriate for estimating the performance of an object remover. Therefore, we propose new evaluation metrics (FID$*$ and U-IDS$*$) to properly evaluate the quality of object removers. Experiments confirm that our method shows better performance in removing target class objects than the masks generated from the semantic segmentation maps, and the two proposed metrics make judgments consistent with humans.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)