Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 47 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 37 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 11 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 195 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 30 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The Cardinality Bound on the Information Bottleneck Representations is Tight (2305.07000v2)

Published 11 May 2023 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: The information bottleneck (IB) method aims to find compressed representations of a variable $X$ that retain the most relevant information about a target variable $Y$. We show that for a wide family of distributions -- namely, when $Y$ is generated by $X$ through a Hamming channel, under mild conditions -- the optimal IB representations require an alphabet strictly larger than that of $X$. This implies that, despite several recent works, the cardinality bound first identified by Witsenhausen and Wyner in 1975 is tight. At the core of our finding is the observation that the IB function in this setting is not strictly concave, similar to the deterministic case, even though the joint distribution of $X$ and $Y$ is of full support. Finally, we provide a complete characterization of the IB function, as well as of the optimal representations for the Hamming case.

Citations (2)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.