Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

The emergence of clusters in self-attention dynamics

Published 9 May 2023 in cs.LG, math.AP, and stat.ML | (2305.05465v6)

Abstract: Viewing Transformers as interacting particle systems, we describe the geometry of learned representations when the weights are not time dependent. We show that particles, representing tokens, tend to cluster toward particular limiting objects as time tends to infinity. Cluster locations are determined by the initial tokens, confirming context-awareness of representations learned by Transformers. Using techniques from dynamical systems and partial differential equations, we show that the type of limiting object that emerges depends on the spectrum of the value matrix. Additionally, in the one-dimensional case we prove that the self-attention matrix converges to a low-rank Boolean matrix. The combination of these results mathematically confirms the empirical observation made by Vaswani et al. [VSP'17] that leaders appear in a sequence of tokens when processed by Transformers.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (36)
  1. The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena. Reviews of modern physics, 77(1):137, 2005.
  2. K-plane clustering. Journal of Global optimization, 16:23–32, 2000.
  3. Yizong Cheng. Mean shift, mode seeking, and clustering. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17(8):790–799, 1995.
  4. Emergence of bi-cluster flocking for the Cucker–Smale model. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 26(06):1191–1218, 2016.
  5. Neural ordinary differential equations. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 31, 2018.
  6. Emergent behavior in flocks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52(5):852–862, 2007.
  7. Attention is not all you need: Pure attention loses rank doubly exponentially with depth. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 2793–2803. PMLR, 2021.
  8. Roland L’vovich Dobrushin. Vlasov equations. Funktsional’nyi Analiz i ego Prilozheniya, 13(2):48–58, 1979.
  9. François Golse. Mean field kinetic equations. Course of Polytechnique, 2013.
  10. Matrix analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
  11. Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation. Journal of Artifical Societies and Social Simulation (JASSS), 5(3), 2002.
  12. Complete cluster predictability of the Cucker–Smale flocking model on the real line. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 231:319–365, 2019.
  13. Stable architectures for deep neural networks. Inverse problems, 34(1), 2017.
  14. LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
  15. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770–778, 2016.
  16. Identity mappings in deep residual networks. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part IV 14, pages 630–645. Springer, 2016.
  17. Clustering and asymptotic behavior in opinion formation. Journal of Differential Equations, 257(11):4165–4187, 2014.
  18. Ulrich Krause. A discrete nonlinear and non-autonomous model of consensus. In Communications in Difference Equations: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Difference Equations, page 227. CRC Press, 2000.
  19. Yoshiki Kuramoto. Self-entrainment of a population of coupled non-linear oscillators. In International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics: January 23–29, 1975, Kyoto University, Kyoto/Japan, pages 420–422. Springer, 1975.
  20. ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representations. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
  21. Understanding and improving transformer from a multi-particle dynamic system point of view. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
  22. A survey of transformers. AI Open, 3:111–132, 2022.
  23. Heterophilious dynamics enhances consensus. SIAM Review, 56(4):577–621, 2014.
  24. Prevalence of neural collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning training. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(40):24652–24663, 2020.
  25. Transport equation with nonlocal velocity in Wasserstein spaces: convergence of numerical schemes. Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 124:73–105, 2013.
  26. Control to flocking of the kinetic Cucker–Smale model. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 47(6):4685–4719, 2015.
  27. Extremal laws for the real Ginibre ensemble. The Annals of Applied Probability, 24(4):1621 – 1651, 2014.
  28. Sinkformers: Transformers with doubly stochastic attention. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 3515–3530. PMLR, 2022.
  29. Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. Physical Review Letters, 75(6):1226, 1995.
  30. René Vidal. Subspace clustering. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 28(2):52–68, 2011.
  31. Fast transformers with clustered attention. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:21665–21674, 2020.
  32. Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 2017.
  33. E Weinan. A proposal on machine learning via dynamical systems. Communications in Mathematics and Statistics, 1(5):1–11, 2017.
  34. A mean-field optimal control formulation of deep learning. Research in Mathematical Sciences, 6(1):10, 2019.
  35. Linformer: Self-attention with linear complexity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.04768, 2020.
  36. Are transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions? In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
Citations (34)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that modeling self-attention as a continuous-time ODE results in distinct clustering of token representations.
  • It uses asymptotic analysis of low-rank Boolean matrix convergence in both one-dimensional and multidimensional settings to reveal clustering behaviors.
  • The study links the influence of eigenvalue spectra on token convergence, providing insights to enhance Transformer architectures and guide future research.

The Emergence of Clusters in Self-Attention Dynamics

This essay provides a detailed exploration of the paper "The Emergence of Clusters in Self-Attention Dynamics" (2305.05465). The paper investigates the geometric structure of learned representations in Transformers by modeling tokens as particles in continuous-time dynamics. The research reveals a clustering phenomenon in token representations influenced by the self-attention mechanism.

Asymptotic Behavior and Clustering

Dynamics and Token Representation

The research models Transformer operations through continuous-time dynamics, specifically as interacting particle systems. The dynamics are governed by the self-attention mechanism, modeled as an ODE system:

x˙i(t)=∑j=1nPij(t)Vxj(t),Pij(t)=e⟨Qxi(t),Kxj(t)⟩∑ℓ=1ne⟨Qxi(t),Kxℓ(t)⟩\dot{x}_i(t) = \sum_{j=1}^n P_{ij}(t) Vx_j(t), \quad P_{ij}(t) = \frac{e^{\langle Qx_i(t), Kx_j(t)\rangle}}{\sum_{\ell=1}^n e^{\langle Qx_i(t), Kx_{\ell}(t)\rangle}}

Here, QQ, KK, and VV are the learned matrices corresponding to query, key, and value in the Transformer architecture.

Convergence Towards Low-Rank and Boolean Self-Attention Matrices

In the one-dimensional case (d=1d=1) with V>0V > 0, the self-attention matrix P(t)P(t) converges to a low-rank Boolean matrix as t→∞t \to \infty, confirming the emergence of distinct clusters within the token representations. This theoretical finding supports empirical observations from previous Transformer studies. Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1: An illustration of the asymptotics of P(t)P(t) entailed by Theorem 1.

Clustering in Transitional and High-Dimensional Spaces

For the identity matrix V=IdV=I_d, tokens converge towards the boundary of a convex polytope, and under certain conditions, they converge towards vertices of a convex polytope. This phenomenon reflects a clustering effect where fewer tokens act as focal points in the representation space: Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Example configuration of clustered token representations in a three-dimensional space.

Impact of Eigenvalues on Clustering Patterns

Real and Simple Leading Eigenvalue

For matrices VV with a simple, positive leading eigenvalue λ1\lambda_1, the token representations converge to parallel hyperplanes in the direction determined by the leading eigenvalue's eigenvector. Specifically, φ1∗(zi(t))\varphi_1^*(z_i(t)), the projection onto this eigenvector, converges to one of at most three distinct scalar values (representing clusters).

Generalization and Higher-Dimensional Results

The paper conjectures that if kk eigenvalues of VV have positive real parts, the representation subspaces' codimensions align accordingly, often resulting in clustering towards kk-dimensional hyperplanes across different segments of the sequence. Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3: Codimension-conjectured clustering in a hypothetical dimensional space.

Theoretical Implications and Further Research

This study mathematically demonstrates that Transformers' self-attention dynamics inherently facilitate a clustering effect of tokens, aligning with empirical findings and intuition about their sequence processing abilities. This clustering property provides a clearer understanding of the syntactic and semantic awareness embedded in Transformer models.

Future research avenues include extending the theoretical framework to incorporate feed-forward networks, multi-head attention dynamics, and potential synergies involving linear attention approximations. Understanding how these extensions influence clustering could enhance efficiencies in Transformer architectures.

Conclusion

The paper "The Emergence of Clusters in Self-Attention Dynamics" provides crucial insight into understanding the foundational geometry of Transformer's learned representations. By leveraging continuous-time dynamics, it elucidates the intrinsic clustering properties of self-attention, thus bridging the gap between empirical performance and theoretical understanding in modern sequence modeling.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 5 tweets with 119 likes about this paper.