Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
98 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
8 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The emergence of clusters in self-attention dynamics (2305.05465v6)

Published 9 May 2023 in cs.LG, math.AP, and stat.ML

Abstract: Viewing Transformers as interacting particle systems, we describe the geometry of learned representations when the weights are not time dependent. We show that particles, representing tokens, tend to cluster toward particular limiting objects as time tends to infinity. Cluster locations are determined by the initial tokens, confirming context-awareness of representations learned by Transformers. Using techniques from dynamical systems and partial differential equations, we show that the type of limiting object that emerges depends on the spectrum of the value matrix. Additionally, in the one-dimensional case we prove that the self-attention matrix converges to a low-rank Boolean matrix. The combination of these results mathematically confirms the empirical observation made by Vaswani et al. [VSP'17] that leaders appear in a sequence of tokens when processed by Transformers.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (36)
  1. The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena. Reviews of modern physics, 77(1):137, 2005.
  2. K-plane clustering. Journal of Global optimization, 16:23–32, 2000.
  3. Yizong Cheng. Mean shift, mode seeking, and clustering. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17(8):790–799, 1995.
  4. Emergence of bi-cluster flocking for the Cucker–Smale model. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 26(06):1191–1218, 2016.
  5. Neural ordinary differential equations. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 31, 2018.
  6. Emergent behavior in flocks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52(5):852–862, 2007.
  7. Attention is not all you need: Pure attention loses rank doubly exponentially with depth. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 2793–2803. PMLR, 2021.
  8. Roland L’vovich Dobrushin. Vlasov equations. Funktsional’nyi Analiz i ego Prilozheniya, 13(2):48–58, 1979.
  9. François Golse. Mean field kinetic equations. Course of Polytechnique, 2013.
  10. Matrix analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
  11. Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation. Journal of Artifical Societies and Social Simulation (JASSS), 5(3), 2002.
  12. Complete cluster predictability of the Cucker–Smale flocking model on the real line. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 231:319–365, 2019.
  13. Stable architectures for deep neural networks. Inverse problems, 34(1), 2017.
  14. LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
  15. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770–778, 2016.
  16. Identity mappings in deep residual networks. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part IV 14, pages 630–645. Springer, 2016.
  17. Clustering and asymptotic behavior in opinion formation. Journal of Differential Equations, 257(11):4165–4187, 2014.
  18. Ulrich Krause. A discrete nonlinear and non-autonomous model of consensus. In Communications in Difference Equations: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Difference Equations, page 227. CRC Press, 2000.
  19. Yoshiki Kuramoto. Self-entrainment of a population of coupled non-linear oscillators. In International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics: January 23–29, 1975, Kyoto University, Kyoto/Japan, pages 420–422. Springer, 1975.
  20. ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representations. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
  21. Understanding and improving transformer from a multi-particle dynamic system point of view. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
  22. A survey of transformers. AI Open, 3:111–132, 2022.
  23. Heterophilious dynamics enhances consensus. SIAM Review, 56(4):577–621, 2014.
  24. Prevalence of neural collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning training. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(40):24652–24663, 2020.
  25. Transport equation with nonlocal velocity in Wasserstein spaces: convergence of numerical schemes. Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 124:73–105, 2013.
  26. Control to flocking of the kinetic Cucker–Smale model. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 47(6):4685–4719, 2015.
  27. Extremal laws for the real Ginibre ensemble. The Annals of Applied Probability, 24(4):1621 – 1651, 2014.
  28. Sinkformers: Transformers with doubly stochastic attention. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 3515–3530. PMLR, 2022.
  29. Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. Physical Review Letters, 75(6):1226, 1995.
  30. René Vidal. Subspace clustering. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 28(2):52–68, 2011.
  31. Fast transformers with clustered attention. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:21665–21674, 2020.
  32. Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 2017.
  33. E Weinan. A proposal on machine learning via dynamical systems. Communications in Mathematics and Statistics, 1(5):1–11, 2017.
  34. A mean-field optimal control formulation of deep learning. Research in Mathematical Sciences, 6(1):10, 2019.
  35. Linformer: Self-attention with linear complexity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.04768, 2020.
  36. Are transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions? In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
Citations (34)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that tokens in Transformer models form clusters over time using an interacting particle system framework.
  • It reveals that the clustering behavior is driven by the spectrum of the value matrix, resulting in distinct configurations like low-rank and vertex clustering.
  • These findings suggest potential for improved context-awareness and computational efficiency in attention mechanisms for AI architectures.

The Emergence of Clusters in Self-Attention Dynamics

The paper "The emergence of clusters in self-attention dynamics" explores the geometric structure of learned representations within the Transformer architecture when its weight matrices are time-independent. Using a theoretical framework of interacting particle systems, the authors describe how tokens represented as particles tend to cluster around specific limiting objects as time progresses indefinitely. This behavior is influenced by the spectrum of the value matrix and is shown to have implications for context-awareness in Transformer models.

Theoretical Framework and Key Findings

Transformers, introduced in 2017, revolutionized AI by enabling LLMs to learn powerful representations through self-attention mechanisms. However, the geometric characteristics of these representations have remained largely unexplored. The authors tackle this gap by drawing parallels between Transformer models and continuous-time dynamics, such as neural ODEs, through which layers can be viewed as a continuous time variable governing interactions within ResNets-like systems.

Continuous-Time Dynamics and Particle Systems

The core of the paper revolves around treating tokens as particles interacting through a self-attention mechanism, formalized as an interacting particle system. The dynamics are expressed as:

x˙i(t)=j=1nPij(t)Vxj(t)\dot{x}_i(t) = \sum_{j=1}^n P_{ij}(t) Vx_j(t)

where Pij(t)P_{ij}(t) are the entries of a n×nn \times n stochastic matrix and are calculated via exponential normalization of inner products of transformed tokens.

Clustering Phenomenon

The major conclusion drawn is the clustering effect wherein tokens, under the self-attention dynamics, tend to organize into clustered configurations as the system evolves. The authors demonstrate several scenarios:

  1. Low-Rank Convergence in 1D: When the value matrix is positive scalar (V>0V>0) and tokens are one-dimensional, the self-attention matrix converges to a low-rank Boolean matrix with entries being either 0 or 1.
  2. Vertex Clustering under Identity Value Matrix: When VV is the identity matrix, tokens cluster around the vertices of a convex polytope. Empirical evidence suggests that most tokens converge to some vertices of this polytope, validating the clustering phenomenon.
  3. Hyperplane Clustering for Positive Eigenvalues: A wider case shows that when the leading eigenvalue is positive and simple, tokens converge towards one of at most three parallel hyperplanes determined by related eigenvectors. This reveals a structured separation and arrangement driven by leading eigenvalues.
  4. Subspace Clustering for High Multiplicity: Under certain paranormal matrices, token clustering is towards vertices of a convex polytope in some directions while converging to linear subspaces in others. This mixed clustering is characterized by the interaction between polytopes and linear subspaces formed by the weights.

Implications and Future Directions

These theoretical discoveries not only fortify empirical observations in language processing tasks related to leader emergence among token sequences but also open avenues for more efficient architecture designs like parameter-efficient models. The clustering insights could potentially optimize computational expense by advising attention reduction schemes.

Future research could explore variations involving multiple heads, extension to discrete-time dynamics, and combinatory effects with feed-forward layers, which could further unravel how weight matrices shape contextually aware and computationally efficient layers within self-attention models.

Overall, this paper provides significant theoretical underpinnings to the operational geometry of Transformers, which are pivotal to AI models utilizing self-attention for complex sequence-based tasks.