Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 37 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 10 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 84 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 198 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 448 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 31 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

On Range Summary Queries (2305.03180v1)

Published 4 May 2023 in cs.CG

Abstract: We study the query version of the approximate heavy hitter and quantile problems. In the former problem, the input is a parameter $\varepsilon$ and a set $P$ of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}d$ where each point is assigned a color from a set $C$, and we want to build a structure s.t. given any geometric range $\gamma$, we can efficiently find a list of approximate heavy hitters in $\gamma\cap P$, i.e., colors that appear at least $\varepsilon |\gamma \cap P|$ times in $\gamma \cap P$, as well as their frequencies with an additive error of $\varepsilon |\gamma \cap P|$. In the latter problem, each point is assigned a weight from a totally ordered universe and the query must output a sequence $S$ of $1+1/\varepsilon$ weights s.t. the $i$-th weight in $S$ has approximate rank $i\varepsilon|\gamma\cap P|$, meaning, rank $i\varepsilon|\gamma\cap P|$ up to an additive error of $\varepsilon|\gamma\cap P|$. Previously, optimal results were only known in 1D [WY11] but a few sub-optimal methods were available in higher dimensions [AW17, ACH+12]. We study the problems for 3D halfspace and dominance queries. We consider the real RAM model with integer registers of size $w=\Theta(\log n)$ bits. For dominance queries, we show optimal solutions for both heavy hitter and quantile problems: using linear space, we can answer both queries in time $O(\log n + 1/\varepsilon)$. Note that as the output size is $\frac{1}{\varepsilon}$, after investing the initial $O(\log n)$ searching time, our structure takes on average $O(1)$ time to find a heavy hitter or a quantile! For more general halfspace heavy hitter queries, the same optimal query time can be achieved by increasing the space by an extra $\log_w\frac{1}{\varepsilon}$ (resp. $\log\log_w\frac{1}{\varepsilon}$) factor in 3D (resp. 2D). By spending extra $\log{O(1)}\frac{1}{\varepsilon}$ factors in time and space, we can also support quantile queries.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.