Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 65 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 39 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 97 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 164 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 466 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Temporal Betweenness Centrality on Shortest Walks Variants (2305.01080v2)

Published 1 May 2023 in cs.DS and cs.SI

Abstract: Betweenness centrality has been extensively studied since its introduction in 1977 as a measure of node importance in graphs. This measure has found use in various applications and has been extended to temporal graphs with time-labeled edges. Recent research by Buss et al. and Rymar et al. has shown that it is possible to compute the shortest path betweenness centrality of all nodes in a temporal graph in $O(n3\,T2)$ and $O(n2\,m\,T2)$ time, respectively, where $T$ is the maximum time, $m$ is the number of temporal edges, and $n$ is the number of nodes. These approaches considered paths that do not take into account contributions from intermediate temporal nodes. In this paper, we study the classical temporal betweenness centrality paths that we call \textit{passive} shortest paths, as well as an alternative variant that we call \textit{active} shortest paths, which takes into account contributions from all temporal nodes. We present an improved analysis of the running time of the classical algorithm for computing betweenness centrality of all nodes, reducing the time complexity to $O(n\,m\,T+ n2\,T)$. Furthermore, for active paths, we show that the betweenness centrality can be computed in $O(n\,m\,T+ n2\,T2)$. We also show that our results hold for different shortest paths variants. Finally, we provide an open-source implementation of our algorithms and conduct experiments on several real-world datasets. We compare the results of the two variants on both the node and time dimensions of the temporal graph, and we also compare the temporal betweenness centrality to its static counterpart. Our experiments suggest that for the shortest foremost variant looking only at the first $10\%$ of the temporal interaction is a very good approximation for the overall top ranked nodes.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)