Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 39 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 91 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 191 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 456 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

LDPC Decoders Prefer More Reliable Parity Bits: Unequal Data Protection Over BSC (2304.14278v2)

Published 27 Apr 2023 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: Low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes are specified by graphs, and are the error correction technique of choice in many communications and data storage contexts. Message passing decoders diffuse information carried by parity bits into the payload, and this paper measures the value of engineering parity bits to be more reliable than message bits. We consider the binary symmetric channel (BSC) and measure the impact of unequal data protection on the threshold of a regular LDPC code. Our analysis also includes doping where the parity bits are known to the decoder. We investigate BSC with Gallager-A decoder, with a $3$-level-alphabet decoder, and with a full belief propagation decoder. We demonstrate through theoretical analysis and simulation that non-equiprobable inputs lead to significant improvements both in the threshold and in the speed with which the decoder converges. We also show that all these improvements are possible even with a simple $3$-level-alphabet decoder.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.