A Conceptual Algorithm for Applying Ethical Principles of AI to Medical Practice (2304.11530v5)
Abstract: AI is poised to transform healthcare delivery through revolutionary advances in clinical decision support and diagnostic capabilities. While human expertise remains foundational to medical practice, AI-powered tools are increasingly matching or exceeding specialist-level performance across multiple domains, paving the way for a new era of democratized healthcare access. These systems promise to reduce disparities in care delivery across demographic, racial, and socioeconomic boundaries by providing high-quality diagnostic support at scale. As a result, advanced healthcare services can be affordable to all populations, irrespective of demographics, race, or socioeconomic background. The democratization of such AI tools can reduce the cost of care, optimize resource allocation, and improve the quality of care. In contrast to humans, AI can potentially uncover complex relationships in the data from a large set of inputs and lead to new evidence-based knowledge in medicine. However, integrating AI into healthcare raises several ethical and philosophical concerns, such as bias, transparency, autonomy, responsibility, and accountability. In this study, we examine recent advances in AI-enabled medical image analysis, current regulatory frameworks, and emerging best practices for clinical integration. We analyze both technical and ethical challenges inherent in deploying AI systems across healthcare institutions, with particular attention to data privacy, algorithmic fairness, and system transparency. Furthermore, we propose practical solutions to address key challenges, including data scarcity, racial bias in training datasets, limited model interpretability, and systematic algorithmic biases. Finally, we outline a conceptual algorithm for responsible AI implementations and identify promising future research and development directions.
- He, J. et al. The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. \JournalTitleNature medicine 25, 30–36 (2019).
- Simonite, T. Google’s ai eye doctor gets ready to go to work in india. wired magazine. june 8, 2017 (2018).
- Poplin, R. et al. Prediction of cardiovascular risk factors from retinal fundus photographs via deep learning. \JournalTitleNature Biomedical Engineering 2, 158 (2018).
- Pivotal trial of an autonomous ai-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care offices. \JournalTitleNPJ digital medicine 1, 1–8 (2018).
- Medtronic. Gi genius™ intelligent endoscopy module (2023). Accessed: 2023-09-16.
- McKinney, S. M. et al. International evaluation of an ai system for breast cancer screening. \JournalTitleNature 577, 89–94 (2020).
- computer-assisted diagnostic software for lesions suspicious for cancer (2023). Accessed: 2023-09-16.
- Ouyang, D. et al. Video-based ai for beat-to-beat assessment of cardiac function. \JournalTitleNature 580, 252–256 (2020).
- Studio, C. Clinical software to unify healthcare data (2023). Accessed: 2023-09-16.
- Health, G. Dermassist (2023). Accessed: 2023-09-16.
- Health, G. The value of genomic analysis (2023). Accessed: 2023-09-16.
- Health, G. Google health research publications (2023). Accessed: 2023-09-16.
- The state of artificial intelligence-based fda-approved medical devices and algorithms: an online database. \JournalTitleNPJ digital medicine 3, 1–8 (2020).
- Centers for medicare & medicaid services. medicare program; hospital inpatient prospective payment systems for acute care hospitals and the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and final policy changes and fiscal year 2021 rates; quality reporting and medicare and medicaid promoting interoperability programs requirements for eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals. \JournalTitleFed. Regist. 85 3, 58432––59107 (2020).
- Artificial intelligence: healthcare’s new nervous system. \JournalTitleAI: Healthcare’s new nervous system (2017).
- Ethical and legal challenges of artificial intelligence-driven healthcare. In Artificial intelligence in healthcare, 295–336 (2020).
- Thirty years of artificial intelligence in medicine (aime) conferences: A review of research themes. \JournalTitleArtificial intelligence in medicine 65, 61–73 (2015).
- Luxton, D. D. Recommendations for the ethical use and design of artificial intelligent care providers. \JournalTitleArtificial intelligence in medicine 62, 1–10 (2014).
- Rigby, M. J. Ethical dimensions of using artificial intelligence in health care. \JournalTitleAMA Journal of Ethics 21, 121–124 (2019).
- European union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a “right to explanation”. \JournalTitleAI magazine 38, 50–57 (2017).
- Impact of accountability, training, and human factors on the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: Exploring the perceptions of healthcare practitioners in the us. \JournalTitleHuman Factors in Healthcare 2, 100021 (2022).
- Merritt, S. M. et al. Automation-induced complacency potential: Development and validation of a new scale. \JournalTitleFrontiers in psychology 10, 225 (2019).
- When machines think: radiology’s next frontier. \JournalTitleRadiology 285, 713–718 (2017).
- Tennøe, T. Artificial Intelligence – Opportunities, Challenges and a Plan for Norway (2018).
- Association, W. M. et al. World medical association declaration of helsinki. ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. \JournalTitleBulletin of the World Health Organization 79, 373 (2001).
- Guidance, W. Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health. \JournalTitleWorld Health Organization (2021).
- Straw, I. The automation of bias in medical artificial intelligence (ai): Decoding the past to create a better future. \JournalTitleArtificial intelligence in medicine 110, 101965 (2020).
- Sex bias in the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder. \JournalTitleProfessional Psychology: Research and Practice 25, 55 (1994).
- Bias in, bias out: Underreporting and underrepresentation of diverse skin types in machine learning research for skin cancer detection—a scoping review. \JournalTitleJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology (2021).
- Lack of transparency and potential bias in artificial intelligence data sets and algorithms: a scoping review. \JournalTitleJAMA dermatology 157, 1362–1369 (2021).
- Addressing artificial intelligence bias in retinal diagnostics. \JournalTitleTranslational Vision Science & Technology 10, 13–13 (2021).
- Smuha, N. A. The eu approach to ethics guidelines for trustworthy artificial intelligence. \JournalTitleComputer Law Review International 20, 97–106 (2019).
- Group, I. S. W. et al. Software as a medical device (samd): key definitions (2013).
- Hansson, S. O. Philosophy of medical technology. In Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, 1275–1300 (2009).
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.