Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Deep Learning in Breast Cancer Imaging: A Decade of Progress and Future Directions (2304.06662v4)

Published 13 Apr 2023 in eess.IV and cs.CV

Abstract: Breast cancer has reached the highest incidence rate worldwide among all malignancies since 2020. Breast imaging plays a significant role in early diagnosis and intervention to improve the outcome of breast cancer patients. In the past decade, deep learning has shown remarkable progress in breast cancer imaging analysis, holding great promise in interpreting the rich information and complex context of breast imaging modalities. Considering the rapid improvement in deep learning technology and the increasing severity of breast cancer, it is critical to summarize past progress and identify future challenges to be addressed. This paper provides an extensive review of deep learning-based breast cancer imaging research, covering studies on mammogram, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and digital pathology images over the past decade. The major deep learning methods and applications on imaging-based screening, diagnosis, treatment response prediction, and prognosis are elaborated and discussed. Drawn from the findings of this survey, we present a comprehensive discussion of the challenges and potential avenues for future research in deep learning-based breast cancer imaging.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (149)
  1. N. Harbeck and M. Gnant, “Breast cancer,” The Lancet, vol. 389, no. 10074, pp. 1134–1150, 2017.
  2. A. N. Giaquinto et al., “Breast cancer statistics, 2022,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2022.
  3. H. Sung et al., “Global cancer statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries,” CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 209–249, 2021.
  4. M. B. Amin et al., “The eighth edition ajcc cancer staging manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging,” CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 93–99, 2017.
  5. L. Nyström et al., “Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the swedish randomised trials,” The Lancet, vol. 359, no. 9310, pp. 909–919, 2002.
  6. WHO, WHO position paper on mammography screening. World Health Organization, 2014.
  7. M. G. Marmot et al., “The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review,” British journal of cancer, vol. 108, no. 11, pp. 2205–2240, 2013.
  8. A. Chong et al., “Digital breast tomosynthesis: concepts and clinical practice,” Radiology, vol. 292, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2019.
  9. J. Wild and D. Neal, “Use of high-frequency ultrasonic waves for detecting changes of texture in living tissues,” The Lancet, vol. 257, no. 6656, pp. 655–657, 1951.
  10. C. M. Sehgal et al., “A review of breast ultrasound,” Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 113–123, 2006.
  11. R. J. Hooley, L. M. Scoutt and L. E. Philpotts, “Breast ultrasonography: state of the art,” Radiology, vol. 268, no. 3, pp. 642–659, 2013.
  12. A. Kapur et al., “Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3d breast ultrasound,” Technology in cancer research & treatment, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 325–334, 2004.
  13. W. A. Berg et al., “Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer,” Jama, vol. 299, no. 18, pp. 2151–2163, 2008.
  14. L. C. Leong et al., “Supplementary breast ultrasound screening in asian women with negative but dense mammograms—a pilot study,” Annals of the Academy of Medicine-Singapore, vol. 41, no. 10, p. 432, 2012.
  15. C. M. Sehgal et al., “Quantitative vascularity of breast masses by doppler imaging: regional variations and diagnostic implications.,” Journal of ultrasound in medicine, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 427–440, 2000.
  16. R. M. Mann, N. Cho and L. Moy, “Breast mri: State of the art,” Radiology, vol. 292, no. 3, pp. 520–536, 2019.
  17. A. Kalovidouri et al., “Fat suppression techniques for breast mri: Dixon versus spectral fat saturation for 3d t1-weighted at 3 t,” La radiologia medica, vol. 122, no. 10, pp. 731–742, 2017.
  18. Elsevier, 2004.
  19. M. Y. Su et al., “Correlation of dynamic contrast enhancement mri parameters with microvessel density and vegf for assessment of angiogenesis in breast cancer.,” Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI, no. 4, p. 18, 2003.
  20. Y. Gao and S. L. Heller, “Abbreviated and ultrafast breast mri in clinical practice,” Radiographics, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1507–1527, 2020.
  21. E. Duregon et al., “Comparative diagnostic and prognostic performances of the hematoxylin-eosin and phospho-histone h3 mitotic count and ki-67 index in adrenocortical carcinoma,” Modern Pathology, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1246–1254, 2014.
  22. E. Klaiman, O. Grimm et al., “Enabling histopathological annotations on immunofluorescent images through virtualization of hematoxylin and eosin,” Journal of pathology informatics, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 1, 2018.
  23. H. Liu, “Application of immunohistochemistry in breast pathology: a review and update,” Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, vol. 138, no. 12, pp. 1629–1642, 2014.
  24. W. M. Hanna et al., “Her2 in situ hybridization in breast cancer: clinical implications of polysomy 17 and genetic heterogeneity,” Modern Pathology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 4–18, 2014.
  25. A. S. Coates et al., “Tailoring therapies—improving the management of early breast cancer: St gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2015,” Annals of oncology, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1533–1546, 2015.
  26. S. J. Magny, R. Shikhman and A. L. Keppke, “Breast imaging reporting and data system,” in StatPearls [Internet], StatPearls publishing, 2022.
  27. Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015.
  28. G. Litjens et al., “A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis,” Medical image analysis, vol. 42, pp. 60–88, 2017.
  29. E. J. Topol, “High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence,” Nature medicine, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 44–56, 2019.
  30. J. Bai et al., “Applying deep learning in digital breast tomosynthesis for automatic breast cancer detection: A review,” Medical image analysis, vol. 71, p. 102049, 2021.
  31. A. Duggento et al., “Deep computational pathology in breast cancer,” in Seminars in cancer biology, vol. 72, pp. 226–237, Elsevier, 2021.
  32. A. Hamidinekoo et al., “Deep learning in mammography and breast histology, an overview and future trends,” Medical image analysis, vol. 47, pp. 45–67, 2018.
  33. K. J. Geras, R. M. Mann and L. Moy, “Artificial intelligence for mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: current concepts and future perspectives,” Radiology, vol. 293, no. 2, p. 246, 2019.
  34. I. Sechopoulos, J. Teuwen and R. Mann, “Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: State of the art,” in Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 72, pp. 214–225, Elsevier, 2021.
  35. MIT press, 2016.
  36. W. S. McCulloch and W. Pitts, “A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity,” The bulletin of mathematical biophysics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 115–133, 1943.
  37. F. Rosenblatt, “The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain.,” Psychological review, vol. 65, no. 6, p. 386, 1958.
  38. D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton and R. J. Williams, “Learning representations by back-propagating errors,” nature, vol. 323, no. 6088, pp. 533–536, 1986.
  39. Y. LeCun et al., “Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition,” Neural computation, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 541–551, 1989.
  40. A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever and G. E. Hinton, “Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (F. Pereira et al., eds.), vol. 25, Curran Associates, Inc., 2012.
  41. J. Deng et al., “Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,” in 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 248–255, Ieee, 2009.
  42. K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, “Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition,” in 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2015), Computational and Biological Learning Society, 2015.
  43. K. He et al., “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 770–778, 2016.
  44. G. Huang et al., “Densely connected convolutional networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 4700–4708, 2017.
  45. C. Szegedy et al., “Going deeper with convolutions,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 1–9, 2015.
  46. C. Szegedy et al., “Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning,” in Thirty-first AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 2017.
  47. A. Dosovitskiy et al., “An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
  48. A. Vaswani et al., “Attention is all you need,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017.
  49. R. Girshick et al., “Region-based convolutional networks for accurate object detection and segmentation,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 142–158, 2015.
  50. T.-Y. Lin et al., “Focal loss for dense object detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp. 2980–2988, 2017.
  51. H. Rezatofighi et al., “Generalized intersection over union: A metric and a loss for bounding box regression,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 658–666, 2019.
  52. R. Girshick, “Fast r-cnn,” in Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp. 1440–1448, 2015.
  53. S. Ren et al., “Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 28, 2015.
  54. J. Redmon et al., “You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 779–788, 2016.
  55. A. Bochkovskiy, C.-Y. Wang and H.-Y. M. Liao, “Yolov4: Optimal speed and accuracy of object detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.10934, 2020.
  56. F. Milletari, N. Navab and S.-A. Ahmadi, “V-net: Fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation,” in 2016 fourth international conference on 3D vision (3DV), pp. 565–571, IEEE, 2016.
  57. J. Long, E. Shelhamer and T. Darrell, “Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 3431–3440, 2015.
  58. O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer and T. Brox, “U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” in International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, pp. 234–241, Springer, 2015.
  59. R. Azad et al., “Medical image segmentation review: The success of u-net,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.14830, 2022.
  60. K. He et al., “Mask r-cnn,” in Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp. 2961–2969, 2017.
  61. B. Zhou et al., “Learning deep features for discriminative localization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 2921–2929, 2016.
  62. M.-A. Carbonneau et al., “Multiple instance learning: A survey of problem characteristics and applications,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 77, pp. 329–353, 2018.
  63. I. Goodfellow et al., “Generative adversarial networks,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 139–144, 2020.
  64. L. Jing and Y. Tian, “Self-supervised visual feature learning with deep neural networks: A survey,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 4037–4058, 2020.
  65. M. Wang and W. Deng, “Deep visual domain adaptation: A survey,” Neurocomputing, vol. 312, pp. 135–153, 2018.
  66. K. Zhou et al., “Domain generalization: A survey,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2022.
  67. J. Dheeba, N. A. Singh and S. T. Selvi, “Computer-aided detection of breast cancer on mammograms: A swarm intelligence optimized wavelet neural network approach,” Journal of biomedical informatics, vol. 49, pp. 45–52, 2014.
  68. H.-P. Chan et al., “Deep learning in medical image analysis,” Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis: Challenges and Applications, pp. 3–21, 2020.
  69. N. Dhungel, G. Carneiro and A. P. Bradley, “The automated learning of deep features for breast mass classification from mammograms,” in International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 106–114, Springer, 2016.
  70. P. Teare et al., “Malignancy detection on mammography using dual deep convolutional neural networks and genetically discovered false color input enhancement,” Journal of digital imaging, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 499–505, 2017.
  71. A. A. Mohamed et al., “A deep learning method for classifying mammographic breast density categories,” Medical physics, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 314–321, 2018.
  72. A. P. Adedigba, S. A. Adeshina and A. M. Aibinu, “Performance evaluation of deep learning models on mammogram classification using small dataset,” Bioengineering, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 161, 2022.
  73. X. Li et al., “Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: integration of image modalities enhances deep learning-based breast mass classification,” European radiology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 778–788, 2020.
  74. R. K. Samala et al., “Breast cancer diagnosis in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of training sample size on multi-stage transfer learning using deep neural nets,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 686–696, 2018.
  75. K. Clancy et al., “Deep learning pre-training strategy for mammogram image classification: an evaluation study,” Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1257–1265, 2020.
  76. E. Sert, S. Ertekin and U. Halici, “Ensemble of convolutional neural networks for classification of breast microcalcification from mammograms,” in 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 689–692, IEEE, 2017.
  77. H. Li et al., “Signed laplacian deep learning with adversarial augmentation for improved mammography diagnosis,” in International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 486–494, Springer, 2019.
  78. W. Zhu et al., “Deep multi-instance networks with sparse label assignment for whole mammogram classification,” in International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, pp. 603–611, Springer, 2017.
  79. X. Shu et al., “Deep neural networks with region-based pooling structures for mammographic image classification,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 2246–2255, 2020.
  80. W. Lotter et al., “Robust breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using an annotation-efficient deep learning approach,” Nature Medicine, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 244–249, 2021.
  81. M. Yousefi, A. Krzyżak and C. Y. Suen, “Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis data using convolutional neural networks and multiple instance learning,” Computers in biology and medicine, vol. 96, pp. 283–293, 2018.
  82. G. Carneiro, J. Nascimento and A. P. Bradley, “Unregistered multiview mammogram analysis with pre-trained deep learning models,” in International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 652–660, Springer, 2015.
  83. G. Carneiro, J. Nascimento and A. P. Bradley, “Automated analysis of unregistered multi-view mammograms with deep learning,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 2355–2365, 2017.
  84. J. Bai et al., “Feature fusion siamese network for breast cancer detection comparing current and prior mammograms,” Medical Physics, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 3654–3669, 2022.
  85. A. Baccouche et al., “Early detection and classification of abnormality in prior mammograms using image-to-image translation and yolo techniques,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, p. 106884, 2022.
  86. S. Shams et al., “Deep generative breast cancer screening and diagnosis,” in International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 859–867, Springer, 2018.
  87. M. Wimmer et al., “Multi-task fusion for improving mammography screening data classification,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 937–950, 2021.
  88. M. Suganthi and M. Madheswaran, “An improved medical decision support system to identify the breast cancer using mammogram,” Journal of medical systems, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 79–91, 2012.
  89. R. Shen et al., “Multicontext multitask learning networks for mass detection in mammogram,” Medical Physics, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1566–1578, 2020.
  90. M. Buda et al., “A data set and deep learning algorithm for the detection of masses and architectural distortions in digital breast tomosynthesis images,” JAMA network open, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. e2119100–e2119100, 2021.
  91. Y. Li et al., “Architectural distortion detection based on superior–inferior directional context and anatomic prior knowledge in digital breast tomosynthesis,” Medical Physics, 2022.
  92. Y. Liu et al., “Compare and contrast: Detecting mammographic soft-tissue lesions with c2-net,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 71, p. 101999, 2021.
  93. Y. Liu et al., “Act like a radiologist: Towards reliable multi-view correspondence reasoning for mammogram mass detection,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2021.
  94. Z. Zhao et al., “Check and link: Pairwise lesion correspondence guides mammogram mass detection,” in European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 384–400, Springer, 2022.
  95. Z. Yang et al., “Momminet-v2: Mammographic multi-view mass identification networks,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 73, p. 102204, 2021.
  96. G. Liang et al., “Weakly-supervised self-training for breast cancer localization,” in 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 1124–1127, IEEE, 2020.
  97. W. Zhu et al., “Adversarial deep structured nets for mass segmentation from mammograms,” in 2018 IEEE 15th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI 2018), pp. 847–850, IEEE, 2018.
  98. M. Mirza and S. Osindero, “Conditional generative adversarial nets,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1784, 2014.
  99. Y. Li et al., “Sap-cgan: Adversarial learning for breast mass segmentation in digital mammogram based on superpixel average pooling,” Medical Physics, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 1157–1167, 2021.
  100. N. R. Gudhe et al., “Area-based breast percentage density estimation in mammograms using weight-adaptive multitask learning,” Scientific reports, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2022.
  101. R. F. Ribeiro et al., “Deep learning methods for lesion detection on mammography images: a comparative analysis,” in 2022 44th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 3526–3529, IEEE, 2022.
  102. P. H. Yi et al., “Deepcat: deep computer-aided triage of screening mammography,” Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 27–35, 2021.
  103. H. Min et al., “Fully automatic computer-aided mass detection and segmentation via pseudo-color mammograms and mask r-cnn,” in 2020 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pp. 1111–1115, IEEE, 2020.
  104. S. Hwang and H.-E. Kim, “Self-transfer learning for weakly supervised lesion localization,” in International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, pp. 239–246, Springer, 2016.
  105. R. Bakalo, R. Ben-Ari and J. Goldberger, “Classification and detection in mammograms with weak supervision via dual branch deep neural net,” in 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019), pp. 1905–1909, IEEE, 2019.
  106. M. V. Sainz de Cea et al., “Multi-task learning for detection and classification of cancer in screening mammography,” in International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 241–250, Springer, 2020.
  107. H. Li et al., “Dual convolutional neural networks for breast mass segmentation and diagnosis in mammography,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 3–13, 2021.
  108. A. Rodriguez-Ruiz et al., “Stand-alone artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography: comparison with 101 radiologists,” JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 111, no. 9, pp. 916–922, 2019.
  109. N. Wu, et al., “Deep neural networks improve radiologists’ performance in breast cancer screening,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1184–1194, 2019.
  110. A. Rodríguez-Ruiz et al., “Detection of breast cancer with mammography: effect of an artificial intelligence support system,” Radiology, vol. 290, no. 2, pp. 305–314, 2019.
  111. M. C. Pinto et al., “Impact of artificial intelligence decision support using deep learning on breast cancer screening interpretation with single-view wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis,” Radiology, vol. 300, no. 3, pp. 529–536, 2021.
  112. C. D. Lehman et al., “Deep learning vs traditional breast cancer risk models to support risk-based mammography screening,” Journal Of The National Cancer Institute, vol. 114, no. 10, pp. 1355–1363, 2022.
  113. K. Lång et al., “Identifying normal mammograms in a large screening population using artificial intelligence,” European radiology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1687–1692, 2021.
  114. S. M. McKinney et al., “International evaluation of an ai system for breast cancer screening,” Nature, vol. 577, no. 7788, pp. 89–94, 2020.
  115. A. Rodriguez-Ruiz et al., “Can we reduce the workload of mammographic screening by automatic identification of normal exams with artificial intelligence? a feasibility study,” European radiology, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 4825–4832, 2019.
  116. X. Wang et al., “Inconsistent performance of deep learning models on mammogram classification,” Journal of the American College of Radiology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 796–803, 2020.
  117. W. Hsu et al., “External validation of an ensemble model for automated mammography interpretation by artificial intelligence,” JAMA network open, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. e2242343–e2242343, 2022.
  118. Y. Dgani, H. Greenspan and J. Goldberger, “Training a neural network based on unreliable human annotation of medical images,” in 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018), pp. 39–42, IEEE, 2018.
  119. Q. Zhou et al., “A machine and human reader study on ai diagnosis model safety under attacks of adversarial images,” Nature communications, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2021.
  120. Z. Li et al., “Domain generalization for mammography detection via multi-style and multi-view contrastive learning,” in International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 98–108, Springer, 2021.
  121. H. R. Roth et al., “Federated learning for breast density classification: A real-world implementation,” in Domain adaptation and representation transfer, and distributed and collaborative learning, pp. 181–191, Springer, 2020.
  122. C. Wang et al., “Knowledge distillation to ensemble global and interpretable prototype-based mammogram classification models,” in International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 14–24, Springer, 2022.
  123. G. Jiang et al., “Synthesis of mammogram from digital breast tomosynthesis using deep convolutional neural network with gradient guided cgans,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 2080–2091, 2021.
  124. J.-Z. Cheng et al., “Computer-aided diagnosis with deep learning architecture: applications to breast lesions in us images and pulmonary nodules in ct scans,” Scientific reports, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2016.
  125. W. K. Moon et al., “Computer-aided diagnosis of breast ultrasound images using ensemble learning from convolutional neural networks,” Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, vol. 190, p. 105361, 2020.
  126. X. Zheng et al., “Deep learning radiomics can predict axillary lymph node status in early-stage breast cancer,” Nature communications, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2020.
  127. L.-Q. Zhou et al., “Lymph node metastasis prediction from primary breast cancer us images using deep learning,” Radiology, vol. 294, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 2020.
  128. X. Guo et al., “Deep learning radiomics of ultrasonography: identifying the risk of axillary non-sentinel lymph node involvement in primary breast cancer,” EBioMedicine, vol. 60, p. 103018, 2020.
  129. Y.-W. Lee et al., “Axillary lymph node metastasis status prediction of early-stage breast cancer using convolutional neural networks,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 130, p. 104206, 2021.
  130. J. Xing et al., “Using bi-rads stratifications as auxiliary information for breast masses classification in ultrasound images,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 2058–2070, 2020.
  131. R. Huang et al., “Aw3m: An auto-weighting and recovery framework for breast cancer diagnosis using multi-modal ultrasound,” Medical image analysis, vol. 72, p. 102137, 2021.
  132. S.-Y. Lu, S.-H. Wang and Y.-D. Zhang, “Safnet: A deep spatial attention network with classifier fusion for breast cancer detection,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 148, p. 105812, 2022.
  133. X. Qian et al., “Prospective assessment of breast cancer risk from multimodal multiview ultrasound images via clinically applicable deep learning,” Nature biomedical engineering, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 522–532, 2021.
  134. H. Tanaka et al., “Computer-aided diagnosis system for breast ultrasound images using deep learning,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 64, no. 23, p. 235013, 2019.
  135. S. Han et al., “A deep learning framework for supporting the classification of breast lesions in ultrasound images,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 62, no. 19, p. 7714, 2017.
  136. A. Hijab et al., “Breast cancer classification in ultrasound images using transfer learning,” in 2019 Fifth international conference on advances in biomedical engineering (ICABME), pp. 1–4, IEEE, 2019.
  137. T. Pang et al., “Semi-supervised gan-based radiomics model for data augmentation in breast ultrasound mass classification,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 203, p. 106018, 2021.
  138. E. Zhang et al., “Birads features-oriented semi-supervised deep learning for breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 65, no. 12, p. 125005, 2020.
  139. X. Wang et al., “Deep virtual adversarial self-training with consistency regularization for semi-supervised medical image classification,” Medical image analysis, vol. 70, p. 102010, 2021.
  140. A. Tarvainen and H. Valpola, “Mean teachers are better role models: Weight-averaged consistency targets improve semi-supervised deep learning results,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017.
  141. T. Miyato et al., “Virtual adversarial training: a regularization method for supervised and semi-supervised learning,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1979–1993, 2018.
  142. M. H. Yap et al., “Automated breast ultrasound lesions detection using convolutional neural networks,” IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1218–1226, 2017.
  143. T.-C. Chiang et al., “Tumor detection in automated breast ultrasound using 3-d cnn and prioritized candidate aggregation,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 240–249, 2018.
  144. Y. Wang et al., “Deeply-supervised networks with threshold loss for cancer detection in automated breast ultrasound,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 866–876, 2019.
  145. Z. Cao et al., “An experimental study on breast lesion detection and classification from ultrasound images using deep learning architectures,” BMC medical imaging, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2019.
  146. S. Y. Shin et al., “Joint weakly and semi-supervised deep learning for localization and classification of masses in breast ultrasound images,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 762–774, 2018.
  147. J. Xing et al., “Lesion segmentation in ultrasound using semi-pixel-wise cycle generative adversarial nets,” IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics, 2020.
  148. W. Gómez-Flores and W. C. de Albuquerque Pereira, “A comparative study of pre-trained convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation of breast tumors in ultrasound,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 126, p. 104036, 2020.
  149. Z. Ning et al., “Smu-net: Saliency-guided morphology-aware u-net for breast lesion segmentation in ultrasound image,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 476–490, 2021.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (10)
  1. Luyang Luo (39 papers)
  2. Xi Wang (275 papers)
  3. Yi Lin (103 papers)
  4. Xiaoqi Ma (14 papers)
  5. Andong Tan (5 papers)
  6. Ronald Chan (3 papers)
  7. Varut Vardhanabhuti (15 papers)
  8. Winnie CW Chu (4 papers)
  9. Kwang-Ting Cheng (96 papers)
  10. Hao Chen (1006 papers)
Citations (30)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now