Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 49 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 172 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 472 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Switching Pushing Skill Combined MPC and Deep Reinforcement Learning for Planar Non-prehensile Manipulation (2303.17379v1)

Published 30 Mar 2023 in cs.RO

Abstract: In this paper, a novel switching pushing skill algorithm is proposed to improve the efficiency of planar non-prehensile manipulation, which draws inspiration from human pushing actions and comprises two sub-problems, i.e., discrete decision-making of pushing point and continuous feedback control of pushing action. In order to solve the sub-problems above, a combination of Model Predictive Control (MPC) and Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) method is employed. Firstly, the selection of pushing point is modeled as a Markov decision process,and an off-policy DRL method is used by reshaping the reward function to train the decision-making model for selecting pushing point from a pre-constructed set based on the current state. Secondly, a motion constraint region (MCR) is constructed for the specific pushing point based on the distance from the target, followed by utilizing the MPC controller to regulate the motion of the object within the MCR towards the target pose. The trigger condition for switching the pushing point occurs when the object reaches the boundary of the MCR under the pushing action. Subsequently, the pushing point and the controller are updated iteratively until the target pose is reached. We conducted pushing experiments on four distinct object shapes in both simulated and physical environments to evaluate our method. The results indicate that our method achieves a significantly higher training efficiency, with a training time that is only about 20% of the baseline method while maintaining around the same success rate. Moreover, our method outperforms the baseline method in terms of both training and execution efficiency of pushing operations, allowing for rapid learning of robot pushing skills.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.