Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 39 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 91 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 191 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 456 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

4D iRIOM: 4D Imaging Radar Inertial Odometry and Mapping (2303.13962v2)

Published 24 Mar 2023 in cs.RO

Abstract: Millimeter wave radar can measure distances, directions, and Doppler velocity for objects in harsh conditions such as fog. The 4D imaging radar with both vertical and horizontal data resembling an image can also measure objects' height. Previous studies have used 3D radars for ego-motion estimation. But few methods leveraged the rich data of imaging radars, and they usually omitted the mapping aspect, thus leading to inferior odometry accuracy. This paper presents a real-time imaging radar inertial odometry and mapping method, iRIOM, based on the submap concept. To deal with moving objects and multipath reflections, we use the graduated non-convexity method to robustly and efficiently estimate ego-velocity from a single scan. To measure the agreement between sparse non-repetitive radar scan points and submap points, the distribution-to-multi-distribution distance for matches is adopted. The ego-velocity, scan-to-submap matches are fused with the 6D inertial data by an iterative extended Kalman filter to get the platform's 3D position and orientation. A loop closure module is also developed to curb the odometry module's drift. To our knowledge, iRIOM based on the two modules is the first 4D radar inertial SLAM system. On our and third-party data, we show iRIOM's favorable odometry accuracy and mapping consistency against the FastLIO-SLAM and the EKFRIO. Also, the ablation study reveal the benefit of inertial data versus the constant velocity model, and scan-to-submap matching versus scan-to-scan matching.

Citations (40)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.