Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 45 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 54 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 22 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 99 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 183 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 467 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Isolation of regular graphs, stars and $k$-chromatic graphs (2303.13709v3)

Published 23 Mar 2023 in math.CO and cs.DM

Abstract: Given a set $\mathcal{F}$ of graphs, we call a copy of a graph in $\mathcal{F}$ an $\mathcal{F}$-graph. The $\mathcal{F}$-isolation number of a graph $G$, denoted by $\iota(G,\mathcal{F})$, is the size of a smallest set $D$ of vertices of $G$ such that the closed neighbourhood of $D$ intersects the vertex sets of the $\mathcal{F}$-graphs contained by $G$ (equivalently, $G - N[D]$ contains no $\mathcal{F}$-graph). Thus, $\iota(G,{K_1})$ is the domination number of $G$. For any integer $k \geq 1$, let $\mathcal{F}{0,k} = {K{1,k}}$, let $\mathcal{F}{1,k}$ be the set of regular graphs of degree at least $k-1$, let $\mathcal{F}{2,k}$ be the set of graphs whose chromatic number is at least $k$, and let $\mathcal{F}{3,k}$ be the union $\mathcal{F}{0,k} \cup \mathcal{F}{1,k} \cup \mathcal{F}{2,k}$. We prove that if $G$ is a connected $n$-vertex graph and $\mathcal{F} = \mathcal{F}{0,k} \cup \mathcal{F}{1,k}$, then $\iota(G, \mathcal{F}) \leq \frac{n}{k+1}$ unless $G$ is a $k$-clique or $k = 2$ and $G$ is a $5$-cycle. This generalizes a classical bound of Ore on the domination number, a bound of Caro and Hansberg on the ${K_{1,k}}$-isolation number, a bound of the author on the cycle isolation number, and a bound of Fenech, Kaemawichanurat and the author on the $k$-clique isolation number. By Brooks' Theorem, the same inequality holds if $\mathcal{F} = \mathcal{F}_{3,k}$. The bounds are sharp.

Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com