Emergent Mind

Isolation of regular graphs, stars and $k$-chromatic graphs

(2303.13709)
Published Mar 23, 2023 in math.CO and cs.DM

Abstract

Given a set $\mathcal{F}$ of graphs, we call a copy of a graph in $\mathcal{F}$ an $\mathcal{F}$-graph. The $\mathcal{F}$-isolation number of a graph $G$, denoted by $\iota(G,\mathcal{F})$, is the size of a smallest set $D$ of vertices of $G$ such that the closed neighbourhood of $D$ intersects the vertex sets of the $\mathcal{F}$-graphs contained by $G$ (equivalently, $G - N[D]$ contains no $\mathcal{F}$-graph). Thus, $\iota(G,{K1})$ is the domination number of $G$. For any integer $k \geq 1$, let $\mathcal{F}{0,k} = {K{1,k}}$, let $\mathcal{F}{1,k}$ be the set of regular graphs of degree at least $k-1$, let $\mathcal{F}{2,k}$ be the set of graphs whose chromatic number is at least $k$, and let $\mathcal{F}{3,k}$ be the union $\mathcal{F}{0,k} \cup \mathcal{F}{1,k} \cup \mathcal{F}{2,k}$. We prove that if $G$ is a connected $n$-vertex graph and $\mathcal{F} = \mathcal{F}{0,k} \cup \mathcal{F}{1,k}$, then $\iota(G, \mathcal{F}) \leq \frac{n}{k+1}$ unless $G$ is a $k$-clique or $k = 2$ and $G$ is a $5$-cycle. This generalizes a classical bound of Ore on the domination number, a bound of Caro and Hansberg on the ${K{1,k}}$-isolation number, a bound of the author on the cycle isolation number, and a bound of Fenech, Kaemawichanurat and the author on the $k$-clique isolation number. By Brooks' Theorem, the same inequality holds if $\mathcal{F} = \mathcal{F}_{3,k}$. The bounds are sharp.

We're not able to analyze this paper right now due to high demand.

Please check back later (sorry!).

Generate a summary of this paper on our Pro plan:

We ran into a problem analyzing this paper.

Newsletter

Get summaries of trending comp sci papers delivered straight to your inbox:

Unsubscribe anytime.