Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 71 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 196 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 467 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Almost-Optimal Sublinear Additive Spanners (2303.12768v3)

Published 22 Mar 2023 in cs.DS

Abstract: Given an undirected unweighted graph $G = (V, E)$ on $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, a subgraph $H\subseteq G$ is a spanner of $G$ with stretch function $f: \mathbb{R}+ \rightarrow \mathbb{R}+$, if for every pair $s, t$ of vertices in $V$, $\text{dist}{H}(s, t)\le f(\text{dist}{G}(s, t))$. When $f(d) = d + o(d)$, $H$ is called a sublinear additive spanner; when $f(d) = d + o(n)$, $H$ is called an \emph{additive spanner}, and $f(d) - d$ is usually called the \emph{additive stretch} of $H$. As our primary result, we show that for any constant $\delta>0$ and constant integer $k\geq 2$, every graph on $n$ vertices has a sublinear additive spanner with stretch function $f(d)=d+O(d{1-1/k})$ and $O\big(n{1+\frac{1+\delta}{2{k+1}-1}}\big)$ edges. When $k = 2$, this improves upon the previous spanner construction with stretch function $f(d) = d + O(d{1/2})$ and $\tilde{O}(n{1+3/17})$ edges; for any constant integer $k\geq 3$, this improves upon the previous spanner construction with stretch function $f(d) = d + O(d{1-1/k})$ and $O\bigg(n{1+\frac{(3/4){k-2}}{7 - 2\cdot (3/4){k-2}}}\bigg)$ edges. Most importantly, the size of our spanners almost matches the lower bound of $\Omega\big(n{1+\frac{1}{2{k+1}-1}}\big)$, which holds for all compression schemes achieving the same stretch function. As our second result, we show a new construction of additive spanners with stretch $O(n{0.403})$ and $\tilde{O}(n)$ edges, which slightly improves upon the previous stretch bound of $O(n{3/7+\varepsilon})$ achieved by linear-size spanners. An additional advantage of our spanner is that it admits a subquadratic construction runtime of $\tilde{O}(m + n{13/7})$, while the previous construction requires all-pairs shortest paths computation which takes $O(\min{mn, n{2.373}})$ time.

Citations (3)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com