Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 45 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 11 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 88 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 214 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 460 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Eigen-informed NeuralODEs: Dealing with stability and convergence issues of NeuralODEs (2302.10892v1)

Published 7 Feb 2023 in cs.LG and cs.AI

Abstract: Using vanilla NeuralODEs to model large and/or complex systems often fails due two reasons: Stability and convergence. NeuralODEs are capable of describing stable as well as instable dynamic systems. Selecting an appropriate numerical solver is not trivial, because NeuralODE properties change during training. If the NeuralODE becomes more stiff, a suboptimal solver may need to perform very small solver steps, which significantly slows down the training process. If the NeuralODE becomes to instable, the numerical solver might not be able to solve it at all, which causes the training process to terminate. Often, this is tackled by choosing a computational expensive solver that is robust to instable and stiff ODEs, but at the cost of a significantly decreased training performance. Our method on the other hand, allows to enforce ODE properties that fit a specific solver or application-related boundary conditions. Concerning the convergence behavior, NeuralODEs often tend to run into local minima, especially if the system to be learned is highly dynamic and/or oscillating over multiple periods. Because of the vanishing gradient at a local minimum, the NeuralODE is often not capable of leaving it and converge to the right solution. We present a technique to add knowledge of ODE properties based on eigenvalues - like (partly) stability, oscillation capability, frequency, damping and/or stiffness - to the training objective of a NeuralODE. We exemplify our method at a linear as well as a nonlinear system model and show, that the presented training process is far more robust against local minima, instabilities and sparse data samples and improves training convergence and performance.

Citations (3)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.