Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 58 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 17 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 179 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 463 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Conditional Predictive Behavior Planning with Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Human-like Autonomous Driving (2212.08787v3)

Published 17 Dec 2022 in cs.RO

Abstract: Making safe and human-like decisions is an essential capability of autonomous driving systems, and learning-based behavior planning presents a promising pathway toward achieving this objective. Distinguished from existing learning-based methods that directly output decisions, this work introduces a predictive behavior planning framework that learns to predict and evaluate from human driving data. This framework consists of three components: a behavior generation module that produces a diverse set of candidate behaviors in the form of trajectory proposals, a conditional motion prediction network that predicts future trajectories of other agents based on each proposal, and a scoring module that evaluates the candidate plans using maximum entropy inverse reinforcement learning (IRL). We validate the proposed framework on a large-scale real-world urban driving dataset through comprehensive experiments. The results show that the conditional prediction model can predict distinct and reasonable future trajectories given different trajectory proposals and the IRL-based scoring module can select plans that are close to human driving. The proposed framework outperforms other baseline methods in terms of similarity to human driving trajectories. Additionally, we find that the conditional prediction model improves both prediction and planning performance compared to the non-conditional model. Lastly, we note that learning the scoring module is crucial for aligning the evaluations with human drivers.

Citations (39)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.