Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 45 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 11 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 88 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 214 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 460 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Adaptive Sparse Structure Development with Pruning and Regeneration for Spiking Neural Networks (2211.12219v2)

Published 22 Nov 2022 in cs.NE and cs.AI

Abstract: Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) are more biologically plausible and computationally efficient. Therefore, SNNs have the natural advantage of drawing the sparse structural plasticity of brain development to alleviate the energy problems of deep neural networks caused by their complex and fixed structures. However, previous SNNs compression works are lack of in-depth inspiration from the brain development plasticity mechanism. This paper proposed a novel method for the adaptive structural development of SNN (SD-SNN), introducing dendritic spine plasticity-based synaptic constraint, neuronal pruning and synaptic regeneration. We found that synaptic constraint and neuronal pruning can detect and remove a large amount of redundancy in SNNs, coupled with synaptic regeneration can effectively prevent and repair over-pruning. Moreover, inspired by the neurotrophic hypothesis, neuronal pruning rate and synaptic regeneration rate were adaptively adjusted during the learning-while-pruning process, which eventually led to the structural stability of SNNs. Experimental results on spatial (MNIST, CIFAR-10) and temporal neuromorphic (N-MNIST, DVS-Gesture) datasets demonstrate that our method can flexibly learn appropriate compression rate for various tasks and effectively achieve superior performance while massively reducing the network energy consumption. Specifically, for the spatial MNIST dataset, our SD-SNN achieves 99.51\% accuracy at the pruning rate 49.83\%, which has a 0.05\% accuracy improvement compared to the baseline without compression. For the neuromorphic DVS-Gesture dataset, 98.20\% accuracy with 1.09\% improvement is achieved by our method when the compression rate reaches 55.50\%.

Citations (9)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.