Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

New Tradeoffs for Decremental Approximate All-Pairs Shortest Paths (2211.01152v4)

Published 2 Nov 2022 in cs.DS

Abstract: We provide new tradeoffs between approximation and running time for the decremental all-pairs shortest paths (APSP) problem. For undirected graphs with $m$ edges and $n$ nodes undergoing edge deletions, we provide four new approximate decremental APSP algorithms, two for weighted and two for unweighted graphs. Our first result is $(2+ \epsilon)$-APSP with total update time $\tilde{O}(m{1/2}n{3/2})$ (when $m= n{1+c}$ for any constant $0<c\<1$). Prior to our work the fastest algorithm for weighted graphs with approximation at most $3$ had total $\tilde O(mn)$ update time for $(1+\epsilon)$-APSP [Bernstein, SICOMP 2016]. Our second result is $(2+\epsilon, W_{u,v})$-APSP with total update time $\tilde{O}(nm^{3/4})$, where the second term is an additive stretch with respect to $W_{u,v}$, the maximum weight on the shortest path from $u$ to $v$. Our third result is $(2+ \epsilon)$-APSP for unweighted graphs in $\tilde O(m^{7/4})$ update time, which for sparse graphs ($m=o(n^{8/7})$) is the first subquadratic $(2+\epsilon)$-approximation. Our last result for unweighted graphs is $(1+\epsilon, 2(k-1))$-APSP, for $k \geq 2 $, with $\tilde{O}(n^{2-1/k}m^{1/k})$ total update time (when $m=n^{1+c}$ for any constant $c \>0$). For comparison, in the special case of $(1+\epsilon, 2)$-approximation, this improves over the state-of-the-art algorithm by [Henzinger, Krinninger, Nanongkai, SICOMP 2016] with total update time of $\tilde{O}(n{2.5})$. All of our results are randomized, work against an oblivious adversary, and have constant query time.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Michal Dory (18 papers)
  2. Sebastian Forster (20 papers)
  3. Yasamin Nazari (17 papers)
  4. Tijn de Vos (11 papers)
Citations (7)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com